
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fair Use in Filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/11/06/fair-use-in-filtering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/11/06/fair-use-in-filtering/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lay</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/11/06/fair-use-in-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-39756</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/11/06/fair-use-in-filtering/#comment-39756</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;blockquote&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;By and large, it ought to be possible to get copyright filtering for entire works to work at least as well as spam filtering&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In spam filtering you have an adversarial relationship between the sender on one side and the recipient+carrier on the other side.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With copyright filtering the sender and receiver are both on the same side, with the carrier being a (probably somewhat unenthusiastic) adversary trying to thwart the transmission.  The real adversary is a rightsholder who really doesn&#039;t have a direct role in the transmission use case.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
  <blockquote>
    <p>By and large, it ought to be possible to get copyright filtering for entire works to work at least as well as spam filtering</p>
  </blockquote>
</blockquote>

<p>In spam filtering you have an adversarial relationship between the sender on one side and the recipient+carrier on the other side.</p>

<p>With copyright filtering the sender and receiver are both on the same side, with the carrier being a (probably somewhat unenthusiastic) adversary trying to thwart the transmission.  The real adversary is a rightsholder who really doesn&#8217;t have a direct role in the transmission use case.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lay</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/11/06/fair-use-in-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-47742</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/11/06/fair-use-in-filtering/#comment-47742</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&gt;&gt; By and large, it ought to be possible to get copyright filtering for entire works to work at least as well as spam filtering&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In spam filtering you have an adversarial relationship between the sender on one side and the recipient+carrier on the other side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With copyright filtering the sender and receiver are both on the same side, with the carrier being a (probably somewhat unenthusiastic) adversary trying to thwart the transmission.  The real adversary is a rightsholder who really doesn&#039;t have a direct role in the transmission use case.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; By and large, it ought to be possible to get copyright filtering for entire works to work at least as well as spam filtering<br /><br />In spam filtering you have an adversarial relationship between the sender on one side and the recipient+carrier on the other side.<br /><br />With copyright filtering the sender and receiver are both on the same side, with the carrier being a (probably somewhat unenthusiastic) adversary trying to thwart the transmission.  The real adversary is a rightsholder who really doesn&#8217;t have a direct role in the transmission use case.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

