<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessig and Corruption at the FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:02:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lippard</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-48376</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lippard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/#comment-48376</guid>
		<description>How can this be readily enforced, when there is a constant flow of personnel from regulator to lobbyist?  Trying to put a cap on information leaks seems to me futile, and you&#039;d be better off making the regulator&#039;s actions more transparent and public than trying to keep a lid on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the problem is “multiple stakeholders generally knew when the commission scheduled votes on proposed rules well before the FCC notified the public,&quot; then make the vote schedules public immediately upon scheduling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can this be readily enforced, when there is a constant flow of personnel from regulator to lobbyist?  Trying to put a cap on information leaks seems to me futile, and you&#8217;d be better off making the regulator&#8217;s actions more transparent and public than trying to keep a lid on it.</p>
<p>If the problem is “multiple stakeholders generally knew when the commission scheduled votes on proposed rules well before the FCC notified the public,&#8221; then make the vote schedules public immediately upon scheduling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lippard</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-39490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lippard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/#comment-39490</guid>
		<description>How can this be readily enforced, when there is a constant flow of personnel from regulator to lobbyist?  Trying to put a cap on information leaks seems to me futile, and you&#039;d be better off making the regulator&#039;s actions more transparent and public than trying to keep a lid on it.

If the problem is “multiple stakeholders generally knew when the commission scheduled votes on proposed rules well before the FCC notified the public,&quot; then make the vote schedules public immediately upon scheduling.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can this be readily enforced, when there is a constant flow of personnel from regulator to lobbyist?  Trying to put a cap on information leaks seems to me futile, and you&#8217;d be better off making the regulator&#8217;s actions more transparent and public than trying to keep a lid on it.</p>
<p>If the problem is “multiple stakeholders generally knew when the commission scheduled votes on proposed rules well before the FCC notified the public,&#8221; then make the vote schedules public immediately upon scheduling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-48375</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/#comment-48375</guid>
		<description>How about the staff who released this information go to prison for a year or two. That might make public corruption look a lot less fun. While we&#039;re on the topic of public corruption, the only way that you are going to clear it up on a large scale is to make it so costly that no lobbyist would ever want to break the rules. Therefore, I suggest either life in prison or capital punishment for attempting to use bribery to influence legislation or the awarding of a contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the staff who released this information go to prison for a year or two. That might make public corruption look a lot less fun. While we&#8217;re on the topic of public corruption, the only way that you are going to clear it up on a large scale is to make it so costly that no lobbyist would ever want to break the rules. Therefore, I suggest either life in prison or capital punishment for attempting to use bribery to influence legislation or the awarding of a contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-39489</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/10/04/lessig-and-corruption-at-the-fcc/#comment-39489</guid>
		<description>How about the staff who released this information go to prison for a year or two. That might make public corruption look a lot less fun. While we&#039;re on the topic of public corruption, the only way that you are going to clear it up on a large scale is to make it so costly that no lobbyist would ever want to break the rules. Therefore, I suggest either life in prison or capital punishment for attempting to use bribery to influence legislation or the awarding of a contract.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the staff who released this information go to prison for a year or two. That might make public corruption look a lot less fun. While we&#8217;re on the topic of public corruption, the only way that you are going to clear it up on a large scale is to make it so costly that no lobbyist would ever want to break the rules. Therefore, I suggest either life in prison or capital punishment for attempting to use bribery to influence legislation or the awarding of a contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
