
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newtonian Physics: All Wrong!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-65960</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-65960</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;what&#039;s intriguing to me as a non physics geek is, the universe is basically composed of the same thing (atoms eletrons energy and blah blah blah), right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;then why we apply diferent rules to diferent amounts of the same thing? why not different amouts of the same rule?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#39;s intriguing to me as a non physics geek is, the universe is basically composed of the same thing (atoms eletrons energy and blah blah blah), right?<br /><br />then why we apply diferent rules to diferent amounts of the same thing? why not different amouts of the same rule?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-62277</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-62277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;what&#039;s intriguing to me as a non physics geek is, the universe is basically composed of the same thing (atoms eletrons energy and blah blah blah), right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;then why we apply diferent rules to diferent amounts of the same thing? why not different amouts of the same rule?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#39;s intriguing to me as a non physics geek is, the universe is basically composed of the same thing (atoms eletrons energy and blah blah blah), right?<br /><br />then why we apply diferent rules to diferent amounts of the same thing? why not different amouts of the same rule?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-58634</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-58634</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;what&#039;s intriguing to me as a non physics geek is, the universe is basically composed of the same thing (atoms eletrons energy and blah blah blah), right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;then why we apply diferent rules to diferent amounts of the same thing? why not different amouts of the same rule?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#39;s intriguing to me as a non physics geek is, the universe is basically composed of the same thing (atoms eletrons energy and blah blah blah), right?<br /><br />then why we apply diferent rules to diferent amounts of the same thing? why not different amouts of the same rule?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-48904</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-48904</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;C#&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C#</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-48903</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-48903</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;C#&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C#</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-39235</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-39235</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;C#&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C#</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-39234</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-39234</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;C#&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C#</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Blafkin</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-48902</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Blafkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-48902</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So, Vyas, Michael, Chris, etc. are saying is that Newtonian Physics are a great way of predicting approximate outcomes, but not really a way of better understanding our universe.  So, I guess the real question is what you want physics to do for you.  If it is applied science, then you&#039;re right.  It works... mostly.   If you are looking for the true understanding of our universe and how and why it works the way it does... that&#039;s where things start falling apart.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Vyas, Michael, Chris, etc. are saying is that Newtonian Physics are a great way of predicting approximate outcomes, but not really a way of better understanding our universe.  So, I guess the real question is what you want physics to do for you.  If it is applied science, then you&#8217;re right.  It works&#8230; mostly.   If you are looking for the true understanding of our universe and how and why it works the way it does&#8230; that&#8217;s where things start falling apart.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Blafkin</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-39233</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Blafkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-39233</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So, Vyas, Michael, Chris, etc. are saying is that Newtonian Physics are a great way of predicting approximate outcomes, but not really a way of better understanding our universe.  So, I guess the real question is what you want physics to do for you.  If it is applied science, then you&#039;re right.  It works... mostly.   If you are looking for the true understanding of our universe and how and why it works the way it does... that&#039;s where things start falling apart.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Vyas, Michael, Chris, etc. are saying is that Newtonian Physics are a great way of predicting approximate outcomes, but not really a way of better understanding our universe.  So, I guess the real question is what you want physics to do for you.  If it is applied science, then you&#8217;re right.  It works&#8230; mostly.   If you are looking for the true understanding of our universe and how and why it works the way it does&#8230; that&#8217;s where things start falling apart.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wren</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-48901</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-48901</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The main thrust of contemporary physics is an attempt to unify Newtonian and Quantum mechanics, because both, in fact, DO work. It&#039;s not like Newton just made do with careless guesses and approximations.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main thrust of contemporary physics is an attempt to unify Newtonian and Quantum mechanics, because both, in fact, DO work. It&#8217;s not like Newton just made do with careless guesses and approximations.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-48900</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-48900</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It more or less works, it doesn&#039;t really work.  At normal scale-of-life, the error (difference between Newtonian and relativistic) is real but too small to be important.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It more or less works, it doesn&#8217;t really work.  At normal scale-of-life, the error (difference between Newtonian and relativistic) is real but too small to be important.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wren</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-39232</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-39232</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The main thrust of contemporary physics is an attempt to unify Newtonian and Quantum mechanics, because both, in fact, DO work. It&#039;s not like Newton just made do with careless guesses and approximations.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main thrust of contemporary physics is an attempt to unify Newtonian and Quantum mechanics, because both, in fact, DO work. It&#8217;s not like Newton just made do with careless guesses and approximations.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-39231</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 06:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-39231</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It more or less works, it doesn&#039;t really work.  At normal scale-of-life, the error (difference between Newtonian and relativistic) is real but too small to be important.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It more or less works, it doesn&#8217;t really work.  At normal scale-of-life, the error (difference between Newtonian and relativistic) is real but too small to be important.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Moore</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-48899</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-48899</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, the axis along which Newtonian physics works and doesn&#039;t work is mass and speed, not depth of investigation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not &quot;wrong&quot; it&#039;s just not applicable in certain situations.  But like you said, it works for day-to-day stuff -- which makes it an analogy that gives the exact opposite impression than the commenter was aiming for.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the axis along which Newtonian physics works and doesn&#8217;t work is mass and speed, not depth of investigation.<br /><br />It&#8217;s not &#8220;wrong&#8221; it&#8217;s just not applicable in certain situations.  But like you said, it works for day-to-day stuff &#8212; which makes it an analogy that gives the exact opposite impression than the commenter was aiming for.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Moore</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-39230</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-39230</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, the axis along which Newtonian physics works and doesn&#039;t work is mass and speed, not depth of investigation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not &quot;wrong&quot; it&#039;s just not applicable in certain situations.  But like you said, it works for day-to-day stuff -- which makes it an analogy that gives the exact opposite impression than the commenter was aiming for.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the axis along which Newtonian physics works and doesn&#8217;t work is mass and speed, not depth of investigation.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s not &#8220;wrong&#8221; it&#8217;s just not applicable in certain situations.  But like you said, it works for day-to-day stuff &#8212; which makes it an analogy that gives the exact opposite impression than the commenter was aiming for.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vyaas</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-48898</link>
		<dc:creator>Vyaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-48898</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly!!!!&lt;br&gt;In a larger scale of things, Newtonian physics is an excellent approximation of the world we live in!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly!!!!<br />In a larger scale of things, Newtonian physics is an excellent approximation of the world we live in!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vyaas</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-39229</link>
		<dc:creator>Vyaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/08/26/newtonian-physics-all-wrong/#comment-39229</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly!!!!
In a larger scale of things, Newtonian physics is an excellent approximation of the world we live in!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly!!!!
In a larger scale of things, Newtonian physics is an excellent approximation of the world we live in!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

