Cheap tramadol Buy tramadol Online casino Tramadol prescription Buy cialis Cialis levitra High roller casino Savings account payday loan Zovirax Augmentin Buy xenical Meridia Consolidate credit card debt Prilosec Best poker software Xenical Best online casino Pay off debt Buy propecia online Credit card debt Debt negotiation Viagra gel Consolidating debt Term life insurance Amoxicillin rash Purchase avandia Car and insurance Classic car insurance Womens Health Zoloft Protonix Prescriptions Funeral director Oncology Pathology Accutane Business credit cards Hydrocodone Vicodin Hydrocodone buy online Insurance Rivotril Percocet Timeshare Movies Phentermine to fla Forex broker Norton Office Vonage Domain names Adult dating Hot Online degree Equifax credit report Cytotec Hair Commodity trading Care Aricept 

FCC rejects Google Microsoft whitespace devices

In the most recent podcast, Jim Harper and I had a little back-and-forth about the idea of a commons model for spectrum. I made the point that while I was hopeful for the future, technology that makes spectrum scarcity a thing of the past (thus allowing a commons to work) isn’t quite here yet. Regulating based on theoretical technology, I said, doesn’t bode well for the here and now.

Well, today comes word that the FCC has rejected the mystery whitespace devices that Google, Microsoft, and others in a consortium pushing for commons treatment of parts of the 700 MHz, had offered for testing. A year ago, the New America Foundation put out a paper called “Why Unlicensed Use of Vacant TV Spectrum Will Not Interfere with Television Reception.” According to The Washington Post today,

After four months of testing, the agency concluded that the devices either interfered with TV signals or could not detect them in order to skirt them. Now the coalition of companies backing the devices, which includes Dell, Intel, EarthLink, Hewlett-Packard and Philips, is going back to the drawing board, possibly to redesign the devices and meet with FCC engineers to explore other options. The FCC said Tuesday that it would continue experimenting with such devices, which use vacant TV frequencies.

I really hope they succeed because I don’t think there’s anything wrong with allowing free use of true whitespaces or commons as long as the technology really works and use truly doesn’t cause interference to an adjacent licenses holder. That said, we can’t devalue otherwise useful spectrum by allocating it as a commons until we know the tech works.

August 3, 2007 | Comments |

  • Oddly, given our usual disagreements, you may find my post about this on the publicknowledge blog interesting.
    http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1150
  • Reading Harry Feld's blog it appears that the Philips device basically works and the MS device doesn't. That's not at all surprising. Philips was a leader in the development of the UWB system that uses licensed spectrum in such a way as not to interfere with licensed uses, and MS is, well, we all know what they are.
  • If the Philips device worked, why do you suppose the FCC rejected the technology? It seems the broadcasters are most worried about the technology being permitted...
  • Tony
    Hm... I don't think the rejection was true, or at least it's not true anymore...

    http://tech.yahoo.com/news/nm/20081104/tc_nm/us...
blog comments powered by Disqus