
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analog Rights Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/comment-page-1/#comment-49667</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 03:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/#comment-49667</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jim Harper, have you done more writing on how your views comport with the Epstein article. I see Epstein closer to JVDeLong...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Harper, have you done more writing on how your views comport with the Epstein article. I see Epstein closer to JVDeLong&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/comment-page-1/#comment-49666</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 02:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/#comment-49666</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;...on the other hand, will allowing circumvention of shopping cart locks further innovation, facillitate freedom, deter the market for circumvention devices, prevent another revolution in the Safeway parking lot:) And what side of the debate will Libertarians fall on if they hold four freedoms disproportionately to all other things in life like the Free Software Foundation?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;on the other hand, will allowing circumvention of shopping cart locks further innovation, facillitate freedom, deter the market for circumvention devices, prevent another revolution in the Safeway parking lot:) And what side of the debate will Libertarians fall on if they hold four freedoms disproportionately to all other things in life like the Free Software Foundation?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/comment-page-1/#comment-38795</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 02:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/#comment-38795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jim Harper, have you done more writing on how your views comport with the Epstein article. I see Epstein closer to JVDeLong...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Harper, have you done more writing on how your views comport with the Epstein article. I see Epstein closer to JVDeLong&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Marti</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/comment-page-1/#comment-49665</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 01:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/#comment-49665</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does the circumvention device have a non-shopping-cart-stealing use?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, if a local fire department says it needs to be able to move carts off the premises in order to reach a neighboring store in case of fire, let them buy the device and let vendors sell it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Likewise, if a political speaker has a need to use a fair use excerpt of a DRM-restricted work in his or her political speech, allow him or her to make or buy a DRM circumvention device, and let vendors sell it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the circumvention device have a non-shopping-cart-stealing use?<br /><br />For example, if a local fire department says it needs to be able to move carts off the premises in order to reach a neighboring store in case of fire, let them buy the device and let vendors sell it.<br /><br />Likewise, if a political speaker has a need to use a fair use excerpt of a DRM-restricted work in his or her political speech, allow him or her to make or buy a DRM circumvention device, and let vendors sell it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/comment-page-1/#comment-38794</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 01:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/#comment-38794</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;...on the other hand, will allowing circumvention of shopping cart locks further innovation, facillitate freedom, deter the market for circumvention devices, prevent another revolution in the Safeway parking lot:) And what side of the debate will Libertarians fall on if they hold four freedoms disproportionately to all other things in life like the Free Software Foundation?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;on the other hand, will allowing circumvention of shopping cart locks further innovation, facillitate freedom, deter the market for circumvention devices, prevent another revolution in the Safeway parking lot:) And what side of the debate will Libertarians fall on if they hold four freedoms disproportionately to all other things in life like the Free Software Foundation?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Marti</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/comment-page-1/#comment-38793</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/#comment-38793</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does the circumvention device have a non-shopping-cart-stealing use?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, if a local fire department says it needs to be able to move carts off the premises in order to reach a neighboring store in case of fire, let them buy the device and let vendors sell it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Likewise, if a political speaker has a need to use a fair use excerpt of a DRM-restricted work in his or her political speech, allow him or her to make or buy a DRM circumvention device, and let vendors sell it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the circumvention device have a non-shopping-cart-stealing use?</p>

<p>For example, if a local fire department says it needs to be able to move carts off the premises in order to reach a neighboring store in case of fire, let them buy the device and let vendors sell it.</p>

<p>Likewise, if a political speaker has a need to use a fair use excerpt of a DRM-restricted work in his or her political speech, allow him or her to make or buy a DRM circumvention device, and let vendors sell it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harper</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/comment-page-1/#comment-49664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/#comment-49664</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It should be illegal to bring up that dreadful shopping cart debate! . . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be illegal to bring up that dreadful shopping cart debate! . . .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harper</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/comment-page-1/#comment-38792</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 21:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/07/05/analog-rights-management/#comment-38792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It should be illegal to bring up that dreadful shopping cart debate! . . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be illegal to bring up that dreadful shopping cart debate! . . .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

