<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Sense from Pence: Ban the Fairness Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:13:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Surina</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-53966</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Surina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/#comment-53966</guid>
		<description>I assume that the fairness doctrine will encompass all broadcasting, but somehow I think the only target is talk radio.  Will it mean that every time a network or cable news program reports about global warming that it will also have to report from opposition to the theory.  I doubt it. Does it mean that anytime a news anchor refers to Bush the liar that it will have to be countered with someone who does not believe that he lied?  Somehow I doubt it. Apparantly broadcast news will become a thing of the past, or be extended to continuous so that all opinions on all subjects can be covered.  Sure it will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that the fairness doctrine will encompass all broadcasting, but somehow I think the only target is talk radio.  Will it mean that every time a network or cable news program reports about global warming that it will also have to report from opposition to the theory.  I doubt it. Does it mean that anytime a news anchor refers to Bush the liar that it will have to be countered with someone who does not believe that he lied?  Somehow I doubt it. Apparantly broadcast news will become a thing of the past, or be extended to continuous so that all opinions on all subjects can be covered.  Sure it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Surina</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-53965</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Surina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/#comment-53965</guid>
		<description>I assume that the fairness doctrine will encompass all broadcasting, but somehow I think the only target is talk radio.  Will it mean that every time a network or cable news program reports about global warming that it will also have to report from opposition to the theory.  I doubt it. Does it mean that anytime a news anchor refers to Bush the liar that it will have to be countered with someone who does not believe that he lied?  Somehow I doubt it. Apparantly broadcast news will become a thing of the past, or be extended to continuous so that all opinions on all subjects can be covered.  Sure it will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that the fairness doctrine will encompass all broadcasting, but somehow I think the only target is talk radio.  Will it mean that every time a network or cable news program reports about global warming that it will also have to report from opposition to the theory.  I doubt it. Does it mean that anytime a news anchor refers to Bush the liar that it will have to be countered with someone who does not believe that he lied?  Somehow I doubt it. Apparantly broadcast news will become a thing of the past, or be extended to continuous so that all opinions on all subjects can be covered.  Sure it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Surina</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-38722</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Surina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/#comment-38722</guid>
		<description>I assume that the fairness doctrine will encompass all broadcasting, but somehow I think the only target is talk radio.  Will it mean that every time a network or cable news program reports about global warming that it will also have to report from opposition to the theory.  I doubt it. Does it mean that anytime a news anchor refers to Bush the liar that it will have to be countered with someone who does not believe that he lied?  Somehow I doubt it. Apparantly broadcast news will become a thing of the past, or be extended to continuous so that all opinions on all subjects can be covered.  Sure it will.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that the fairness doctrine will encompass all broadcasting, but somehow I think the only target is talk radio.  Will it mean that every time a network or cable news program reports about global warming that it will also have to report from opposition to the theory.  I doubt it. Does it mean that anytime a news anchor refers to Bush the liar that it will have to be countered with someone who does not believe that he lied?  Somehow I doubt it. Apparantly broadcast news will become a thing of the past, or be extended to continuous so that all opinions on all subjects can be covered.  Sure it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Surina</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-38721</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Surina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/06/26/good-sense-from-pence-ban-the-fairness-doctrine/#comment-38721</guid>
		<description>I assume that the fairness doctrine will encompass all broadcasting, but somehow I think the only target is talk radio.  Will it mean that every time a network or cable news program reports about global warming that it will also have to report from opposition to the theory.  I doubt it. Does it mean that anytime a news anchor refers to Bush the liar that it will have to be countered with someone who does not believe that he lied?  Somehow I doubt it. Apparantly broadcast news will become a thing of the past, or be extended to continuous so that all opinions on all subjects can be covered.  Sure it will.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that the fairness doctrine will encompass all broadcasting, but somehow I think the only target is talk radio.  Will it mean that every time a network or cable news program reports about global warming that it will also have to report from opposition to the theory.  I doubt it. Does it mean that anytime a news anchor refers to Bush the liar that it will have to be countered with someone who does not believe that he lied?  Somehow I doubt it. Apparantly broadcast news will become a thing of the past, or be extended to continuous so that all opinions on all subjects can be covered.  Sure it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
