The Piggybacking Epidemic

by on April 18, 2007 · 2 comments

My co-blogger Brian Moore notes another of these ridiculous “wi-fi theft” cases, this one in the UK. Brian’s take is spot-on:

I can’t think of a better example of a victim-less crimes. The “victims” were so unconcerned about people accessing their network that they didn’t bother to give it even the minimal security that most wireless access points will automatically prompt you to install. Secondly, absolutely nothing the “perpetrators” did harmed the “victim.” This is a positive externality — this is like me listening to good music coming out of your house. We both benefit from your purchase. It’s better than bad, it’s good!

The only exception would be if the connection burglars were doing something that negatively impacted the owners of the network — such as downloading massive files that slowed their connection. But nothing in the article implies this — they merely saw him sitting in a car across the street with a laptop. If someone cracks your encryption and steals your credit card numbers, then yes, this is a crime. But that’s not what’s happening.

Here’s the crime they were charged with: “dishonestly obtaining electronic communications services with intent to avoid payment.” Imagine a similar crime — I purchase a newspaper and throw it out into the street after I’m done with it. Someone walks by and picks it up, and starts reading it. Then the police arrest him for “dishonestly obtaining paper communications services with intent to avoid payment.” What’s worse, in this example, the original owner of the newspaper has actually lost the ability to use it because there’s only one copy, even if it’s obvious he doesn’t care about it. “Stealing” wireless access doesn’t (normally) impact the owner’s ability to use it.

  • Hank Miller

    Just for the record, my access point at my house is left open for anyone to use. It isn’t that I can’t secure it, it is that I have decided to give away some of the bandwidth that I have purchased.

    Now I am taking a risk – someone might abuse it (download too much, child porn, planning a crime, etc). However I consider the risk low.

    All I ask is that if you use my access point, you open up your access point at your house just in case I happen to need internet access in your town.

  • Hank Miller

    Just for the record, my access point at my house is left open for anyone to use. It isn’t that I can’t secure it, it is that I have decided to give away some of the bandwidth that I have purchased.

    Now I am taking a risk – someone might abuse it (download too much, child porn, planning a crime, etc). However I consider the risk low.

    All I ask is that if you use my access point, you open up your access point at your house just in case I happen to need internet access in your town.

Previous post:

Next post: