
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Thoughts on ICANN&#8217;s Rejection of &#8220;.xxx&#8221; TLD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary McGath</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/comment-page-1/#comment-51183</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary McGath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/#comment-51183</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if the TLD might have gone through more smoothly if some other name had been chosen. &quot;XXX&quot; is an advertising term and may have aroused antagonism for that reason.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What name could they have chosen? I don&#039;t know. &quot;.porn&quot; might have been better, but would have had some of the same problems.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the TLD might have gone through more smoothly if some other name had been chosen. &#8220;XXX&#8221; is an advertising term and may have aroused antagonism for that reason.<br /><br />What name could they have chosen? I don&#8217;t know. &#8220;.porn&#8221; might have been better, but would have had some of the same problems.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary McGath</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/comment-page-1/#comment-37876</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary McGath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/#comment-37876</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if the TLD might have gone through more smoothly if some other name had been chosen. &quot;XXX&quot; is an advertising term and may have aroused antagonism for that reason.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What name could they have chosen? I don&#039;t know. &quot;.porn&quot; might have been better, but would have had some of the same problems.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the TLD might have gone through more smoothly if some other name had been chosen. &#8220;XXX&#8221; is an advertising term and may have aroused antagonism for that reason.</p>

<p>What name could they have chosen? I don&#8217;t know. &#8220;.porn&#8221; might have been better, but would have had some of the same problems.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fergie</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/comment-page-1/#comment-51182</link>
		<dc:creator>Fergie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/#comment-51182</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed, this issue is not (entirely) about morality, segregation, etc. -- in fact, some well-known pr0n &quot;brand&quot; names refuse to move from their existing .com brand-names. And persnally, I can&#039;t really say that I blame them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The whole issue of creating a .xxx TLD really stinks to me from it&#039;s inception -- an effort to villinize the porn industry.&lt;br&gt;$.02,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- ferg&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, this issue is not (entirely) about morality, segregation, etc. &#8212; in fact, some well-known pr0n &#8220;brand&#8221; names refuse to move from their existing .com brand-names. And persnally, I can&#8217;t really say that I blame them.<br /><br />The whole issue of creating a .xxx TLD really stinks to me from it&#8217;s inception &#8212; an effort to villinize the porn industry.<br />$.02,<br /><br />- ferg</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fergie</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/comment-page-1/#comment-37875</link>
		<dc:creator>Fergie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 18:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/#comment-37875</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed, this issue is not (entirely) about morality, segregation, etc. -- in fact, some well-known pr0n &quot;brand&quot; names refuse to move from their existing .com brand-names. And persnally, I can&#039;t really say that I blame them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The whole issue of creating a .xxx TLD really stinks to me from it&#039;s inception -- an effort to villinize the porn industry.
$.02,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;ferg&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, this issue is not (entirely) about morality, segregation, etc. &#8212; in fact, some well-known pr0n &#8220;brand&#8221; names refuse to move from their existing .com brand-names. And persnally, I can&#8217;t really say that I blame them.</p>

<p>The whole issue of creating a .xxx TLD really stinks to me from it&#8217;s inception &#8212; an effort to villinize the porn industry.
$.02,</p>

<ul>
<li>ferg</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/comment-page-1/#comment-51181</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 17:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/#comment-51181</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m most persuaded by Seth Finkelstein&#039;s argument that the whole thing is just a &lt;a href=&quot;http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1997492,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;boondoggle for the xxx registrar&lt;/a&gt; as a good reason not to allow this domain.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m most persuaded by Seth Finkelstein&#8217;s argument that the whole thing is just a <a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1997492,00.html" rel="nofollow">boondoggle for the xxx registrar</a> as a good reason not to allow this domain.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/comment-page-1/#comment-51180</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/#comment-51180</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So, Adam, it&#039;s my understanding that the porn industry was itself opposed to the xxx TLD. Their argument was that having such domain would open the door for more content regulation, not less. They feared that governments would force the players in the porn industry to use xxx domain names, making them much more identifiable, at which point they could have been targeted with regulations. Maybe ultimately censorship.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You don&#039;t discuss this above.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Adam, it&#8217;s my understanding that the porn industry was itself opposed to the xxx TLD. Their argument was that having such domain would open the door for more content regulation, not less. They feared that governments would force the players in the porn industry to use xxx domain names, making them much more identifiable, at which point they could have been targeted with regulations. Maybe ultimately censorship.<br /><br />You don&#8217;t discuss this above.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/comment-page-1/#comment-37874</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/#comment-37874</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m most persuaded by Seth Finkelstein&#039;s argument that the whole thing is just a &lt;a href=&quot;http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1997492,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;boondoggle for the xxx registrar&lt;/a&gt; as a good reason not to allow this domain.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m most persuaded by Seth Finkelstein&#8217;s argument that the whole thing is just a <a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1997492,00.html" rel="nofollow">boondoggle for the xxx registrar</a> as a good reason not to allow this domain.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/comment-page-1/#comment-37873</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/04/06/a-few-thoughts-on-icanns-rejection-of-xxx-tld/#comment-37873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So, Adam, it&#039;s my understanding that the porn industry was itself opposed to the xxx TLD. Their argument was that having such domain would open the door for more content regulation, not less. They feared that governments would force the players in the porn industry to use xxx domain names, making them much more identifiable, at which point they could have been targeted with regulations. Maybe ultimately censorship.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You don&#039;t discuss this above.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Adam, it&#8217;s my understanding that the porn industry was itself opposed to the xxx TLD. Their argument was that having such domain would open the door for more content regulation, not less. They feared that governments would force the players in the porn industry to use xxx domain names, making them much more identifiable, at which point they could have been targeted with regulations. Maybe ultimately censorship.</p>

<p>You don&#8217;t discuss this above.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

