
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media and neutrality regulation: contradictions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabisco</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-37332</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/#comment-37332</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am not for regulation in either instance but particularly in the case of media consolidation.  The Internet has unquestionably become a major player in the media landscape, particularly when it comes to attracting advertising dollars, and less restrictive media consolidation rules actually serve to protect &quot;fledgling voices&quot; in broadcasting. Without the resources afforded by corporate ownership, these independent voices would be unable to compete with cable, satellite (both television and radio), and an ever-growing Internet for the advertising dollars on which they rely.  And in the spirit of full disclosure, I do some consulting work for the NAB.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not for regulation in either instance but particularly in the case of media consolidation.  The Internet has unquestionably become a major player in the media landscape, particularly when it comes to attracting advertising dollars, and less restrictive media consolidation rules actually serve to protect &#8220;fledgling voices&#8221; in broadcasting. Without the resources afforded by corporate ownership, these independent voices would be unable to compete with cable, satellite (both television and radio), and an ever-growing Internet for the advertising dollars on which they rely.  And in the spirit of full disclosure, I do some consulting work for the NAB.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabisco</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-54832</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/#comment-54832</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am not for regulation in either instance but particularly in the case of media consolidation.  The Internet has unquestionably become a major player in the media landscape, particularly when it comes to attracting advertising dollars, and less restrictive media consolidation rules actually serve to protect &quot;fledgling voices&quot; in broadcasting. Without the resources afforded by corporate ownership, these independent voices would be unable to compete with cable, satellite (both television and radio), and an ever-growing Internet for the advertising dollars on which they rely.  And in the spirit of full disclosure, I do some consulting work for the NAB.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not for regulation in either instance but particularly in the case of media consolidation.  The Internet has unquestionably become a major player in the media landscape, particularly when it comes to attracting advertising dollars, and less restrictive media consolidation rules actually serve to protect &#8220;fledgling voices&#8221; in broadcasting. Without the resources afforded by corporate ownership, these independent voices would be unable to compete with cable, satellite (both television and radio), and an ever-growing Internet for the advertising dollars on which they rely.  And in the spirit of full disclosure, I do some consulting work for the NAB.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-37331</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/#comment-37331</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Crawford takes aim at her rivals in the net neutrality battle, the vile trolls at Free Press. FP&#039;s main issue is media consolidation and the growing power of Bond villain Rupert Murdoch.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There was an interesting split in reactions to the AT&amp;T/SBC merger agreement on the part of the neutrinos, where the Free Press/Tim Wu/lefty blog/telco regulator crowd hailed it as a victory, while the Internet-oriented neutrinos such as Crawford, Isenberg, and Evslin called it a setback.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m glad to see the rift is widening, because net neutrality is such a fraud that all of its advocates need to be exposed for the confidence game they&#039;re running at the expense of the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crawford takes aim at her rivals in the net neutrality battle, the vile trolls at Free Press. FP&#8217;s main issue is media consolidation and the growing power of Bond villain Rupert Murdoch.</p>

<p>There was an interesting split in reactions to the AT&amp;T/SBC merger agreement on the part of the neutrinos, where the Free Press/Tim Wu/lefty blog/telco regulator crowd hailed it as a victory, while the Internet-oriented neutrinos such as Crawford, Isenberg, and Evslin called it a setback.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m glad to see the rift is widening, because net neutrality is such a fraud that all of its advocates need to be exposed for the confidence game they&#8217;re running at the expense of the Internet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-54831</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/#comment-54831</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Crawford takes aim at her rivals in the net neutrality battle, the vile trolls at Free Press. FP&#039;s main issue is media consolidation and the growing power of Bond villain Rupert Murdoch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There was an interesting split in reactions to the AT&amp;T;/SBC merger agreement on the part of the neutrinos, where the Free Press/Tim Wu/lefty blog/telco regulator crowd hailed it as a victory, while the Internet-oriented neutrinos such as Crawford, Isenberg, and Evslin called it a setback.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m glad to see the rift is widening, because net neutrality is such a fraud that all of its advocates need to be exposed for the confidence game they&#039;re running at the expense of the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crawford takes aim at her rivals in the net neutrality battle, the vile trolls at Free Press. FP&#8217;s main issue is media consolidation and the growing power of Bond villain Rupert Murdoch.<br /><br />There was an interesting split in reactions to the AT&#038;T;/SBC merger agreement on the part of the neutrinos, where the Free Press/Tim Wu/lefty blog/telco regulator crowd hailed it as a victory, while the Internet-oriented neutrinos such as Crawford, Isenberg, and Evslin called it a setback.<br /><br />I&#8217;m glad to see the rift is widening, because net neutrality is such a fraud that all of its advocates need to be exposed for the confidence game they&#8217;re running at the expense of the Internet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-37330</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/#comment-37330</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know about you, but I&#039;m against regulation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regulating neutrality is a foot in the door to regulation per se.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ve already seen how regulating the airwaves can be shortsighted when better technologies could make more efficient use of it if it were unregulated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If network providers really believe they can make more money by prioritising packets rather than adding more bandwidth overall, then that&#039;s probably better for everyone than being forced to provide neutral network access.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regulation is an overhead - and bad news.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but I&#8217;m against regulation.</p>

<p>Regulating neutrality is a foot in the door to regulation per se.</p>

<p>We&#8217;ve already seen how regulating the airwaves can be shortsighted when better technologies could make more efficient use of it if it were unregulated.</p>

<p>If network providers really believe they can make more money by prioritising packets rather than adding more bandwidth overall, then that&#8217;s probably better for everyone than being forced to provide neutral network access.</p>

<p>Regulation is an overhead &#8211; and bad news.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/comment-page-1/#comment-54830</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/27/media-and-neutrality-regulation-contradictions/#comment-54830</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know about you, but I&#039;m against regulation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regulating neutrality is a foot in the door to regulation per se.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&#039;ve already seen how regulating the airwaves can be shortsighted when better technologies could make more efficient use of it if it were unregulated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If network providers really believe they can make more money by prioritising packets rather than adding more bandwidth overall, then that&#039;s probably better for everyone than being forced to provide neutral network access.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regulation is an overhead - and bad news.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but I&#8217;m against regulation.<br /><br />Regulating neutrality is a foot in the door to regulation per se.<br /><br />We&#8217;ve already seen how regulating the airwaves can be shortsighted when better technologies could make more efficient use of it if it were unregulated.<br /><br />If network providers really believe they can make more money by prioritising packets rather than adding more bandwidth overall, then that&#8217;s probably better for everyone than being forced to provide neutral network access.<br /><br />Regulation is an overhead &#8211; and bad news.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

