
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wu, Skype, Walled Gardens and &#8220;Openness&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Le</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-37308</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/#comment-37308</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It sounds like Carlo would also argue that we should let the market settle DRM issues rather than repeal the DMCA.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I generally find TechDirt trying too hard to be catchy. Their goal in critiquing any business model or policy is to show that its not 100% rational or logical. Now, thats both the role and value of analysts, but only after you realize that business and policy decisions can be necessary or valuable without being 100%, and thereby cut the analysts out of the final decision making. Otherwise society would be hamstrung and make no decisions at all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like Carlo would also argue that we should let the market settle DRM issues rather than repeal the DMCA.</p>

<p>I generally find TechDirt trying too hard to be catchy. Their goal in critiquing any business model or policy is to show that its not 100% rational or logical. Now, thats both the role and value of analysts, but only after you realize that business and policy decisions can be necessary or valuable without being 100%, and thereby cut the analysts out of the final decision making. Otherwise society would be hamstrung and make no decisions at all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Le</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-44211</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/#comment-44211</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It sounds like Carlo would also argue that we should let the market settle DRM issues rather than repeal the DMCA.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I generally find TechDirt trying too hard to be catchy. Their goal in critiquing any business model or policy is to show that its not 100% rational or logical. Now, thats both the role and value of analysts, but only after you realize that business and policy decisions can be necessary or valuable without being 100%, and thereby cut the analysts out of the final decision making. Otherwise society would be hamstrung and make no decisions at all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like Carlo would also argue that we should let the market settle DRM issues rather than repeal the DMCA.<br /><br />I generally find TechDirt trying too hard to be catchy. Their goal in critiquing any business model or policy is to show that its not 100% rational or logical. Now, thats both the role and value of analysts, but only after you realize that business and policy decisions can be necessary or valuable without being 100%, and thereby cut the analysts out of the final decision making. Otherwise society would be hamstrung and make no decisions at all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HandsOff</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-37307</link>
		<dc:creator>HandsOff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/#comment-37307</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just as in the larger net neutrality debate, Wu et al. are seeking government intervention not because the market is broken and in need of regulation but because the market is not producing the exact result they want.  And as I&#039;ve noted before, I do some work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition, but I&#039;ve always felt that unnecessarily preemptive regulation is simply bad policy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as in the larger net neutrality debate, Wu et al. are seeking government intervention not because the market is broken and in need of regulation but because the market is not producing the exact result they want.  And as I&#8217;ve noted before, I do some work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition, but I&#8217;ve always felt that unnecessarily preemptive regulation is simply bad policy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HandsOff</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/comment-page-1/#comment-44210</link>
		<dc:creator>HandsOff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/24/wu-skype-walled-gardens-and-openness/#comment-44210</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just as in the larger net neutrality debate, Wu et al. are seeking government intervention not because the market is broken and in need of regulation but because the market is not producing the exact result they want.  And as I&#039;ve noted before, I do some work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition, but I&#039;ve always felt that unnecessarily preemptive regulation is simply bad policy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as in the larger net neutrality debate, Wu et al. are seeking government intervention not because the market is broken and in need of regulation but because the market is not producing the exact result they want.  And as I&#8217;ve noted before, I do some work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition, but I&#8217;ve always felt that unnecessarily preemptive regulation is simply bad policy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

