
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing Chicken With Consumers:  Wu Calls for Cellphone Regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-37137</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/#comment-37137</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The continuing consolidation of the telephone market, landline and cellular, can lead to only one thing: monopolization.  Sure, in addition to a dominant one or two providers, there is a struggling train of stragglers.  But there were multiple suppliers during the former AT&amp;T&#039;s reign, too.  No one was deceived by the existence of Podunk Telephone in Paducah that AT&amp;T wasn&#039;t in supreme control.  All common carriage service tends to end in monopolistic market control through consolidation, collusion, or regulation. It&#039;s an axiom of business, supported by the entirety of utility history in America. To paraphrase The Who, soon, too soon, the &quot;new&quot; AT&amp;T (the former SBC) is the same as the old one.  The rest hardly matter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The continuing consolidation of the telephone market, landline and cellular, can lead to only one thing: monopolization.  Sure, in addition to a dominant one or two providers, there is a struggling train of stragglers.  But there were multiple suppliers during the former AT&amp;T&#8217;s reign, too.  No one was deceived by the existence of Podunk Telephone in Paducah that AT&amp;T wasn&#8217;t in supreme control.  All common carriage service tends to end in monopolistic market control through consolidation, collusion, or regulation. It&#8217;s an axiom of business, supported by the entirety of utility history in America. To paraphrase The Who, soon, too soon, the &#8220;new&#8221; AT&amp;T (the former SBC) is the same as the old one.  The rest hardly matter.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-46790</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/#comment-46790</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The continuing consolidation of the telephone market, landline and cellular, can lead to only one thing: monopolization.  Sure, in addition to a dominant one or two providers, there is a struggling train of stragglers.  But there were multiple suppliers during the former AT&amp;T;&#039;s reign, too.  No one was deceived by the existence of Podunk Telephone in Paducah that AT&amp;T; wasn&#039;t in supreme control.  All common carriage service tends to end in monopolistic market control through consolidation, collusion, or regulation. It&#039;s an axiom of business, supported by the entirety of utility history in America. To paraphrase The Who, soon, too soon, the &quot;new&quot; AT&amp;T; (the former SBC) is the same as the old one.  The rest hardly matter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The continuing consolidation of the telephone market, landline and cellular, can lead to only one thing: monopolization.  Sure, in addition to a dominant one or two providers, there is a struggling train of stragglers.  But there were multiple suppliers during the former AT&#038;T;&#8217;s reign, too.  No one was deceived by the existence of Podunk Telephone in Paducah that AT&#038;T; wasn&#8217;t in supreme control.  All common carriage service tends to end in monopolistic market control through consolidation, collusion, or regulation. It&#8217;s an axiom of business, supported by the entirety of utility history in America. To paraphrase The Who, soon, too soon, the &#8220;new&#8221; AT&#038;T; (the former SBC) is the same as the old one.  The rest hardly matter.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-37136</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/#comment-37136</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s official: Tim Wu is a communist.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seriously, however, the net neutrality activists who over-sold their cause so egregiously in the last session of Congress seem to feel compelled to over-sell the over-sold fears by taking it into areas where they don&#039;t have a shred of a case. The &quot;Save The Internet&quot; coalition funded by Google (by way of Moveon) is now demanding free broadband for everybody, and here we have Prof. Wu, who actually should know better, taking on the highly-competitive cell phone market.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suppose this indicates that it&#039;s even easier to commit adultery the second time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official: Tim Wu is a communist.</p>

<p>Seriously, however, the net neutrality activists who over-sold their cause so egregiously in the last session of Congress seem to feel compelled to over-sell the over-sold fears by taking it into areas where they don&#8217;t have a shred of a case. The &#8220;Save The Internet&#8221; coalition funded by Google (by way of Moveon) is now demanding free broadband for everybody, and here we have Prof. Wu, who actually should know better, taking on the highly-competitive cell phone market.</p>

<p>I suppose this indicates that it&#8217;s even easier to commit adultery the second time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-46789</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2007/02/12/playing-chicken-with-consumers-wu-calls-for-cellphone-regulation/#comment-46789</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s official: Tim Wu is a communist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, however, the net neutrality activists who over-sold their cause so egregiously in the last session of Congress seem to feel compelled to over-sell the over-sold fears by taking it into areas where they don&#039;t have a shred of a case. The &quot;Save The Internet&quot; coalition funded by Google (by way of Moveon) is now demanding free broadband for everybody, and here we have Prof. Wu, who actually should know better, taking on the highly-competitive cell phone market.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suppose this indicates that it&#039;s even easier to commit adultery the second time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official: Tim Wu is a communist.<br /><br />Seriously, however, the net neutrality activists who over-sold their cause so egregiously in the last session of Congress seem to feel compelled to over-sell the over-sold fears by taking it into areas where they don&#8217;t have a shred of a case. The &#8220;Save The Internet&#8221; coalition funded by Google (by way of Moveon) is now demanding free broadband for everybody, and here we have Prof. Wu, who actually should know better, taking on the highly-competitive cell phone market.<br /><br />I suppose this indicates that it&#8217;s even easier to commit adultery the second time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

