Comments on: Music Industry Booming, Part 2 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Tim http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36955 Tim Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:35:09 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-36955 <p>Noel, I still don't know what you're talking about. Does "digital copyright policies" mean the DMCA? I have <i>never</i> advocated that the copyrights of artists not be respected and enforced.</p> Noel, I still don’t know what you’re talking about. Does “digital copyright policies” mean the DMCA? I have never advocated that the copyrights of artists not be respected and enforced.

]]> By: Tim http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-55553 Tim Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:35:09 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-55553 <p>Noel, I still don't know what you're talking about. Does "digital copyright policies" mean the DMCA? I have <i>never</i> advocated that the copyrights of artists not be respected and enforced.</p> Noel, I still don’t know what you’re talking about. Does “digital copyright policies” mean the DMCA? I have never advocated that the copyrights of artists not be respected and enforced.

]]> By: Noel Le http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36954 Noel Le Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:50:22 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-36954 <p>Well, unless digital copyright policies are respected and enforced, thats what happens Tim. If I misrepresented your views, then please clarify.</p> <p>Its funny, you claim to support musicians by saying how they labels do not always have their interest in mind, but the person who has an interest <em>against</em> these artists is you Tim.</p> Well, unless digital copyright policies are respected and enforced, thats what happens Tim. If I misrepresented your views, then please clarify.

Its funny, you claim to support musicians by saying how they labels do not always have their interest in mind, but the person who has an interest against these artists is you Tim.

]]> By: Noel Le http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-55552 Noel Le Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:50:22 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-55552 <p>Well, unless digital copyright policies are respected and enforced, thats what happens Tim. If I misrepresented your views, then please clarify.<br><br>Its funny, you claim to support musicians by saying how they labels do not always have their interest in mind, but the person who has an interest <em>against</em> these artists is you Tim.</p> Well, unless digital copyright policies are respected and enforced, thats what happens Tim. If I misrepresented your views, then please clarify.

Its funny, you claim to support musicians by saying how they labels do not always have their interest in mind, but the person who has an interest against these artists is you Tim.

]]> By: Tim Lee http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36953 Tim Lee Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:49:46 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-36953 <p><i>Nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do.</i></p> <p>Noel, when have I ever said that musicians should be forced to waive their copyrights? You keep putting words in my mouth, and I really wish you'd knock it off.</p> Nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do.

Noel, when have I ever said that musicians should be forced to waive their copyrights? You keep putting words in my mouth, and I really wish you’d knock it off.

]]> By: Tim Lee http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-55551 Tim Lee Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:49:46 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-55551 <p><i>Nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do.</i><br><br>Noel, when have I ever said that musicians should be forced to waive their copyrights? You keep putting words in my mouth, and I really wish you'd knock it off.</p> Nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do.

Noel, when have I ever said that musicians should be forced to waive their copyrights? You keep putting words in my mouth, and I really wish you’d knock it off.

]]> By: Daniel Sollero http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36952 Daniel Sollero Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:11:25 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-36952 <p>Actually there are some new music contracts that already count with the concerts revenue. So the musician has 2 ways: totally independent or totally explored. The middle way is not the path to stardom. But, in this long tail era, stardom is overrated.</p> Actually there are some new music contracts that already count with the concerts revenue. So the musician has 2 ways: totally independent or totally explored. The middle way is not the path to stardom. But, in this long tail era, stardom is overrated.

]]> By: Daniel Sollero http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-55550 Daniel Sollero Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:11:25 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-55550 <p>Actually there are some new music contracts that already count with the concerts revenue.<br>So the musician has 2 ways: totally independent or totally explored.<br>The middle way is not the path to stardom. But, in this long tail era, stardom is overrated.</p> Actually there are some new music contracts that already count with the concerts revenue.
So the musician has 2 ways: totally independent or totally explored.
The middle way is not the path to stardom. But, in this long tail era, stardom is overrated.

]]> By: Noel Le http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36951 Noel Le Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:24:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-36951 <p>1) shouldn't musicians be encouraged to tap the Internet as a revenue stream:) 2) I believe artists who try to push their music to the widest audience by giving them away for free are interested in the "long term" benefits; but nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do:) 3) its fine to break down the economics of music copyright into digital and real world, but it doesn't help when doing so distorts your view of the industry. Pricing a song at zero sounds like a witty twist in logic but does not consider the production costs. 4) when musicians waive some copyright privileges, its not called piracy, thus your claim about zero-piracy inducing artists giving away songs is a scenario of reasoning tripping over linquistics. 5) you still don't address my point in your previous post about the <em>thriving music industry.</em> I raised an issue that the costs of piracy outweighs its benefits.</p> 1) shouldn’t musicians be encouraged to tap the Internet as a revenue stream:) 2) I believe artists who try to push their music to the widest audience by giving them away for free are interested in the “long term” benefits; but nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do:) 3) its fine to break down the economics of music copyright into digital and real world, but it doesn’t help when doing so distorts your view of the industry. Pricing a song at zero sounds like a witty twist in logic but does not consider the production costs. 4) when musicians waive some copyright privileges, its not called piracy, thus your claim about zero-piracy inducing artists giving away songs is a scenario of reasoning tripping over linquistics. 5) you still don’t address my point in your previous post about the thriving music industry. I raised an issue that the costs of piracy outweighs its benefits.

]]> By: Noel Le http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-55549 Noel Le Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:24:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-55549 <p>1) shouldn't musicians be encouraged to tap the Internet as a revenue stream:)<br>2) I believe artists who try to push their music to the widest audience by giving them away for free are interested in the "long term" benefits; but nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do:)<br>3) its fine to break down the economics of music copyright into digital and real world, but it doesn't help when doing so distorts your view of the industry. Pricing a song at zero sounds like a witty twist in logic but does not consider the production costs.<br>4) when musicians waive some copyright privileges, its not called piracy, thus your claim about zero-piracy inducing artists giving away songs is a scenario of reasoning tripping over linquistics.<br>5) you still don't address my point in your previous post about the <em>thriving music industry.</em> I raised an issue that the costs of piracy outweighs its benefits.</p> 1) shouldn’t musicians be encouraged to tap the Internet as a revenue stream:)
2) I believe artists who try to push their music to the widest audience by giving them away for free are interested in the “long term” benefits; but nobody really thinks that artists should be forced to waive their privileges under copyrights like you do:)
3) its fine to break down the economics of music copyright into digital and real world, but it doesn’t help when doing so distorts your view of the industry. Pricing a song at zero sounds like a witty twist in logic but does not consider the production costs.
4) when musicians waive some copyright privileges, its not called piracy, thus your claim about zero-piracy inducing artists giving away songs is a scenario of reasoning tripping over linquistics.
5) you still don’t address my point in your previous post about the thriving music industry. I raised an issue that the costs of piracy outweighs its benefits.

]]> By: Noel Le http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36950 Noel Le Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:16:04 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-36950 <p>What?!</p> What?!

]]> By: Noel Le http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-55548 Noel Le Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:16:04 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/29/music-industry-booming-part-2/#comment-55548 <p>What?!</p> What?!

]]>