http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/comment-page-1/#comment-36725 Tim Lee Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:04:47 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/#comment-36725 <p>Ted: Really? I've watched the video twice now and I didn't catch that. At what point in the video does he mention that? Or are you saying that Han helped Apple get the patents?</p> Ted: Really? I’ve watched the video twice now and I didn’t catch that. At what point in the video does he mention that? Or are you saying that Han helped Apple get the patents?

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/comment-page-1/#comment-45524 Tim Lee Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:04:47 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/#comment-45524 <p>Ted: Really? I've watched the video twice now and I didn't catch that. At what point in the video does he mention that? Or are you saying that Han helped Apple get the patents?</p> Ted: Really? I’ve watched the video twice now and I didn’t catch that. At what point in the video does he mention that? Or are you saying that Han helped Apple get the patents?

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/comment-page-1/#comment-36724 Tim Pritlove Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:49:05 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/#comment-36724 <p>The demonstration of Jeff Han was explicitly referring to Apple having the patents on this stuff.</p> The demonstration of Jeff Han was explicitly referring to Apple having the patents on this stuff.

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/comment-page-1/#comment-45523 Tim Pritlove Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:49:05 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/#comment-45523 <p>The demonstration of Jeff Han was explicitly referring to Apple having the patents on this stuff.</p> The demonstration of Jeff Han was explicitly referring to Apple having the patents on this stuff.

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/comment-page-1/#comment-36723 Steve R. Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:27:11 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/#comment-36723 <p>Noel: A more fundamental question. Why is the patent office allowing these patents? If the patent office was doing its job, the patents would be rejected.</p> Noel: A more fundamental question. Why is the patent office allowing these patents? If the patent office was doing its job, the patents would be rejected.

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/comment-page-1/#comment-45522 Steve R. Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:27:11 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/#comment-45522 <p>Noel: A more fundamental question. Why is the patent office allowing these patents? If the patent office was doing its job, the patents would be rejected.</p> Noel: A more fundamental question. Why is the patent office allowing these patents? If the patent office was doing its job, the patents would be rejected.

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/comment-page-1/#comment-36722 Noel Le Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:38:16 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/#comment-36722 <p>So are you invalidating Apple's patents?</p> So are you invalidating Apple’s patents?

]]> http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/comment-page-1/#comment-45521 Noel Le Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:38:16 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2007/01/11/multi-touch-prior-art/#comment-45521 <p>So are you invalidating Apple's patents?</p> So are you invalidating Apple’s patents?

]]>