
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Was the Biggest Tech Policy Story of 2006?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: enigma_foundry</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-36544</link>
		<dc:creator>enigma_foundry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/#comment-36544</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s no doubt in my mind that the big story was the nearly total discrediting of e-voting, especially e-voting that is not backed up by a paper trail, where the paper trail is the actual vote.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This happened incrementally though, so it wasn&#039;t ever a big story all at once.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, by the end of 2006, e-voting without a verified a legally binding paper trail is DOA...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no doubt in my mind that the big story was the nearly total discrediting of e-voting, especially e-voting that is not backed up by a paper trail, where the paper trail is the actual vote.</p>

<p>This happened incrementally though, so it wasn&#8217;t ever a big story all at once.</p>

<p>But, by the end of 2006, e-voting without a verified a legally binding paper trail is DOA&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eee_eff</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-54697</link>
		<dc:creator>eee_eff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/#comment-54697</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s no doubt in my mind that the big story was the nearly total discrediting of e-voting, especially e-voting that is not backed up by a paper trail, where the paper trail is the actual vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This happened incrementally though, so it wasn&#039;t ever a big story all at once.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, by the end of 2006, e-voting without a verified a legally binding paper trail is DOA...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no doubt in my mind that the big story was the nearly total discrediting of e-voting, especially e-voting that is not backed up by a paper trail, where the paper trail is the actual vote.<br /><br />This happened incrementally though, so it wasn&#8217;t ever a big story all at once.<br /><br />But, by the end of 2006, e-voting without a verified a legally binding paper trail is DOA&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-36543</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/#comment-36543</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to the continuing debate and information on this blog, I did write my Congresscritters to protest that Net Neutrality was a solution to a virtually non-existent problem. Hopefully these communications have a little bit of impact, at least.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The possibility of regulation should be held over the heads of industry for a while, though, so they won&#039;t create a problem that needs regulating. I think we had the best possible outcome, in which legislation was threatened, but not passed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the continuing debate and information on this blog, I did write my Congresscritters to protest that Net Neutrality was a solution to a virtually non-existent problem. Hopefully these communications have a little bit of impact, at least.</p>

<p>The possibility of regulation should be held over the heads of industry for a while, though, so they won&#8217;t create a problem that needs regulating. I think we had the best possible outcome, in which legislation was threatened, but not passed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-54696</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/#comment-54696</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to the continuing debate and information on this blog, I did write my Congresscritters to protest that Net Neutrality was a solution to a virtually non-existent problem. Hopefully these communications have a little bit of impact, at least.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The possibility of regulation should be held over the heads of industry for a while, though, so they won&#039;t create a problem that needs regulating. I think we had the best possible outcome, in which legislation was threatened, but not passed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the continuing debate and information on this blog, I did write my Congresscritters to protest that Net Neutrality was a solution to a virtually non-existent problem. Hopefully these communications have a little bit of impact, at least.<br /><br />The possibility of regulation should be held over the heads of industry for a while, though, so they won&#8217;t create a problem that needs regulating. I think we had the best possible outcome, in which legislation was threatened, but not passed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-36542</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/#comment-36542</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;T&#039;s cave-in on neut netrality (see tomorrow&#039;s WSJ) has to rank pretty high, and so does the story of the Great Asian Spam Blackout caused by the earthquake&#039;s destruction of the Taiwan Tube to the US.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s cave-in on neut netrality (see tomorrow&#8217;s WSJ) has to rank pretty high, and so does the story of the Great Asian Spam Blackout caused by the earthquake&#8217;s destruction of the Taiwan Tube to the US.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-54695</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/#comment-54695</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;T;&#039;s cave-in on neut netrality (see tomorrow&#039;s WSJ) has to rank pretty high, and so does the story of the Great Asian Spam Blackout caused by the earthquake&#039;s destruction of the Taiwan Tube to the US.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&#038;T;&#8217;s cave-in on neut netrality (see tomorrow&#8217;s WSJ) has to rank pretty high, and so does the story of the Great Asian Spam Blackout caused by the earthquake&#8217;s destruction of the Taiwan Tube to the US.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Le</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-36541</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/#comment-36541</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It was a pretty big year for patent law, with eBay, RIM and KSR. There you have the presumption of validity, patent trolls, a judge who set precedent for how &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; to let USPTO re-examination take its course and the non-obvious standard. All you need now is to mix in some mystery, seduction and conspiracy to come out with a real life drama.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a pretty big year for patent law, with eBay, RIM and KSR. There you have the presumption of validity, patent trolls, a judge who set precedent for how <em>not</em> to let USPTO re-examination take its course and the non-obvious standard. All you need now is to mix in some mystery, seduction and conspiracy to come out with a real life drama.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Le</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-54694</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/28/what-was-the-biggest-tech-policy-story-of-2006/#comment-54694</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It was a pretty big year for patent law, with eBay, RIM and KSR. There you have the presumption of validity, patent trolls, a judge who set precedent for how &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; to let USPTO re-examination take its course and the non-obvious standard. All you need now is to mix in some mystery, seduction and conspiracy to come out with a real life drama.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a pretty big year for patent law, with eBay, RIM and KSR. There you have the presumption of validity, patent trolls, a judge who set precedent for how <em>not</em> to let USPTO re-examination take its course and the non-obvious standard. All you need now is to mix in some mystery, seduction and conspiracy to come out with a real life drama.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

