
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Should McDowell Do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/12/14/what-should-mcdowell-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/14/what-should-mcdowell-do/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ross</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/14/what-should-mcdowell-do/comment-page-1/#comment-36410</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/14/what-should-mcdowell-do/#comment-36410</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;On the Hill, as you know, Hance, if a committee has secondary referral on a bill, they have only so long to act on it and that&#039;s it. DoJ has already approved this, and as the ones performing the antitrust review I&#039;d equate them with the committee of first referral. The FCC, with its dangerously imprecise public interest standard, would be the committee of secondary referral. We need a rule where if the FCC doesn&#039;t act on any merger after X date then it is automatically approved.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Hill, as you know, Hance, if a committee has secondary referral on a bill, they have only so long to act on it and that&#8217;s it. DoJ has already approved this, and as the ones performing the antitrust review I&#8217;d equate them with the committee of first referral. The FCC, with its dangerously imprecise public interest standard, would be the committee of secondary referral. We need a rule where if the FCC doesn&#8217;t act on any merger after X date then it is automatically approved.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ross</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/14/what-should-mcdowell-do/comment-page-1/#comment-49238</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/14/what-should-mcdowell-do/#comment-49238</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;On the Hill, as you know, Hance, if a committee has secondary referral on a bill, they have only so long to act on it and that&#039;s it. DoJ has already approved this, and as the ones performing the antitrust review I&#039;d equate them with the committee of first referral. The FCC, with its dangerously imprecise public interest standard, would be the committee of secondary referral. We need a rule where if the FCC doesn&#039;t act on any merger after X date then it is automatically approved.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Hill, as you know, Hance, if a committee has secondary referral on a bill, they have only so long to act on it and that&#8217;s it. DoJ has already approved this, and as the ones performing the antitrust review I&#8217;d equate them with the committee of first referral. The FCC, with its dangerously imprecise public interest standard, would be the committee of secondary referral. We need a rule where if the FCC doesn&#8217;t act on any merger after X date then it is automatically approved.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

