<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK: May we interest you in some spectrum?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/12/12/uk-may-we-interest-you-in-some-spectrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/12/uk-may-we-interest-you-in-some-spectrum/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:25:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ira Brodsky</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/12/uk-may-we-interest-you-in-some-spectrum/comment-page-1/#comment-36358</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira Brodsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/12/uk-may-we-interest-you-in-some-spectrum/#comment-36358</guid>
		<description>Forgive me if I&#039;m a bit skeptical of European regulators.

There is technology agnostic spectrum and there is technology agnostic spectrum.  The European 3G band was billed as &quot;technology agnostic,&quot; but it turned out there was a catch: bidders were required to select their technology in advance.  This regulatory sleight-of-hand assured that bidders would choose the only technology perceived as safe.

The plan to auction hundreds of MHz is what&#039;s most interesting.  Previous auctions on both sides of the Atlantic were arguably designed to maximize revenue by combining auctions with artificially-created shortages.  Auctioning hundreds of MHz should help achieve the original auction goal: distributing spectrum in a fair and market-driven manner.

However, it will be interesting to see how the UK 3G operators react. They may fight this.  They paid hefty prices for relatively narrow slices of 2 GHz spectrum and now Ofcom comes along with what may look like, in comparison, spectrum dumping.  The UK&#039;s 3G operators may be understandably angry if they find themselves competing against operators who paid considerably less for considerably more bandwidth in adjacent spectrum.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me if I&#8217;m a bit skeptical of European regulators.</p>
<p>There is technology agnostic spectrum and there is technology agnostic spectrum.  The European 3G band was billed as &#8220;technology agnostic,&#8221; but it turned out there was a catch: bidders were required to select their technology in advance.  This regulatory sleight-of-hand assured that bidders would choose the only technology perceived as safe.</p>
<p>The plan to auction hundreds of MHz is what&#8217;s most interesting.  Previous auctions on both sides of the Atlantic were arguably designed to maximize revenue by combining auctions with artificially-created shortages.  Auctioning hundreds of MHz should help achieve the original auction goal: distributing spectrum in a fair and market-driven manner.</p>
<p>However, it will be interesting to see how the UK 3G operators react. They may fight this.  They paid hefty prices for relatively narrow slices of 2 GHz spectrum and now Ofcom comes along with what may look like, in comparison, spectrum dumping.  The UK&#8217;s 3G operators may be understandably angry if they find themselves competing against operators who paid considerably less for considerably more bandwidth in adjacent spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira Brodsky</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/12/uk-may-we-interest-you-in-some-spectrum/comment-page-1/#comment-48806</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira Brodsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/12/uk-may-we-interest-you-in-some-spectrum/#comment-48806</guid>
		<description>Forgive me if I&#039;m a bit skeptical of European regulators.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is technology agnostic spectrum and there is technology agnostic spectrum.  The European 3G band was billed as &quot;technology agnostic,&quot; but it turned out there was a catch: bidders were required to select their technology in advance.  This regulatory sleight-of-hand assured that bidders would choose the only technology perceived as safe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The plan to auction hundreds of MHz is what&#039;s most interesting.  Previous auctions on both sides of the Atlantic were arguably designed to maximize revenue by combining auctions with artificially-created shortages.  Auctioning hundreds of MHz should help achieve the original auction goal: distributing spectrum in a fair and market-driven manner.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, it will be interesting to see how the UK 3G operators react. They may fight this.  They paid hefty prices for relatively narrow slices of 2 GHz spectrum and now Ofcom comes along with what may look like, in comparison, spectrum dumping.  The UK&#039;s 3G operators may be understandably angry if they find themselves competing against operators who paid considerably less for considerably more bandwidth in adjacent spectrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me if I&#8217;m a bit skeptical of European regulators.</p>
<p>There is technology agnostic spectrum and there is technology agnostic spectrum.  The European 3G band was billed as &#8220;technology agnostic,&#8221; but it turned out there was a catch: bidders were required to select their technology in advance.  This regulatory sleight-of-hand assured that bidders would choose the only technology perceived as safe.</p>
<p>The plan to auction hundreds of MHz is what&#8217;s most interesting.  Previous auctions on both sides of the Atlantic were arguably designed to maximize revenue by combining auctions with artificially-created shortages.  Auctioning hundreds of MHz should help achieve the original auction goal: distributing spectrum in a fair and market-driven manner.</p>
<p>However, it will be interesting to see how the UK 3G operators react. They may fight this.  They paid hefty prices for relatively narrow slices of 2 GHz spectrum and now Ofcom comes along with what may look like, in comparison, spectrum dumping.  The UK&#8217;s 3G operators may be understandably angry if they find themselves competing against operators who paid considerably less for considerably more bandwidth in adjacent spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
