
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality Shopping Is Bad for the Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOTI</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-36352</link>
		<dc:creator>HOTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/#comment-36352</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is a good way to frame the &quot;net neutrality&quot; debate and one that isn&#039;t raised often among all the hypothetical scenarios predicitng the end of the internet without net neutrality regulations.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t speak to the MI bill, but I have been following the national debate in my work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition and the federal regulations would prohibit the prioritization of VOIP, video, and gaming packets over a spam email packet.  We are already seeing problems with VOIP calls being dropped and poor reception due to overcrowded network and net legislation regulating the internet in the name of net neutrality certainly wouldn&#039;t resolve this problem.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good way to frame the &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; debate and one that isn&#8217;t raised often among all the hypothetical scenarios predicitng the end of the internet without net neutrality regulations.</p>

<p>I can&#8217;t speak to the MI bill, but I have been following the national debate in my work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition and the federal regulations would prohibit the prioritization of VOIP, video, and gaming packets over a spam email packet.  We are already seeing problems with VOIP calls being dropped and poor reception due to overcrowded network and net legislation regulating the internet in the name of net neutrality certainly wouldn&#8217;t resolve this problem.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOTI</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-49400</link>
		<dc:creator>HOTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/#comment-49400</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is a good way to frame the &quot;net neutrality&quot; debate and one that isn&#039;t raised often among all the hypothetical scenarios predicitng the end of the internet without net neutrality regulations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can&#039;t speak to the MI bill, but I have been following the national debate in my work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition and the federal regulations would prohibit the prioritization of VOIP, video, and gaming packets over a spam email packet.  We are already seeing problems with VOIP calls being dropped and poor reception due to overcrowded network and net legislation regulating the internet in the name of net neutrality certainly wouldn&#039;t resolve this problem.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good way to frame the &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; debate and one that isn&#8217;t raised often among all the hypothetical scenarios predicitng the end of the internet without net neutrality regulations.<br /><br />I can&#8217;t speak to the MI bill, but I have been following the national debate in my work with the Hands Off the Internet coalition and the federal regulations would prohibit the prioritization of VOIP, video, and gaming packets over a spam email packet.  We are already seeing problems with VOIP calls being dropped and poor reception due to overcrowded network and net legislation regulating the internet in the name of net neutrality certainly wouldn&#8217;t resolve this problem.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stogdill</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-36351</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stogdill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/#comment-36351</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure I ever thought of it that way; in fact, I&#039;m not sure I do now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One thing I can&#039;t help but think is that the non-stop ads I see on TV these days talking about how &quot;net neutrality is designed to stuff more cash in those rich Silicon Valley pockets&quot; are just evidence that Comcast and Verizon learned how to do advertising by watching political campaign ads.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I ever thought of it that way; in fact, I&#8217;m not sure I do now.</p>

<p>One thing I can&#8217;t help but think is that the non-stop ads I see on TV these days talking about how &#8220;net neutrality is designed to stuff more cash in those rich Silicon Valley pockets&#8221; are just evidence that Comcast and Verizon learned how to do advertising by watching political campaign ads.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stogdill</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-49399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stogdill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/12/11/net-neutrality-shopping-is-bad-for-the-economy/#comment-49399</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure I ever thought of it that way; in fact, I&#039;m not sure I do now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One thing I can&#039;t help but think is that the non-stop ads I see on TV these days talking about how &quot;net neutrality is designed to stuff more cash in those rich Silicon Valley pockets&quot; are just evidence that Comcast and Verizon learned how to do advertising by watching political campaign ads.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I ever thought of it that way; in fact, I&#8217;m not sure I do now.<br /><br />One thing I can&#8217;t help but think is that the non-stop ads I see on TV these days talking about how &#8220;net neutrality is designed to stuff more cash in those rich Silicon Valley pockets&#8221; are just evidence that Comcast and Verizon learned how to do advertising by watching political campaign ads.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

