Cheap tramadol Buy tramadol Online casino Tramadol prescription Buy cialis Cialis levitra High roller casino Savings account payday loan Zovirax Augmentin Buy xenical Meridia Consolidate credit card debt Prilosec Best poker software Xenical Best online casino Pay off debt Buy propecia online Credit card debt Debt negotiation Viagra gel Consolidating debt Term life insurance Amoxicillin rash Purchase avandia Car and insurance Classic car insurance Womens Health Zoloft Protonix Prescriptions Funeral director Oncology Pathology Accutane Business credit cards Hydrocodone Vicodin Hydrocodone buy online Insurance Rivotril Percocet Timeshare Movies Phentermine to fla Forex broker Norton Office Vonage Domain names Adult dating Hot Online degree Equifax credit report Cytotec Hair Commodity trading Care Aricept 

Tim Lee

Secure Elections Are Too Much Work

I knew it couldn’t be that easy. The TGDC rejected NIST’s proposal (which I discussed on Friday) to decertify paperless e-voting machines after they couldn’t get the 8 votes they needed to approve it:

Committee member Brit Williams, a computer scientist who has conducted certification evaluations of Georgia’s paperless electronic voting system, opposed the measure. “You are talking about basically a reinstallation of the entire voting system hardware,” he said.

Mike Masnick points out how ridiculous this is:

Why yes. Yes we are. That’s because the entire voting system hardware is totally screwed up. So, to be more specific, we’re talking about stopping an e-voting program that has serious problems and has raised plenty of legitimate questions about just how fair and accurate our elections are. That seems like a perfectly valid reason that shouldn’t be tossed aside just because it’ll be a lot of work. We also thought that democracy itself was supposed to be hard work, but apparently some of those on the Technical Guidelines Committee disagree.

December 5, 2006 | Comments |

  • The Technical Guidelines Committee is answerable to the incumbents. Do you think they'd want fair elections?

    But the NIST report specifically declares decertification of existing systems to be outside of its scope. As you said earlier, the existing machines might be "grandfathered." So it wouldn't even require replacing any existing hardware. It would just prevent more untrustable systems from being installed.
  • I have been trying to point out to folk from time to time, that if proprietary e-voting becomes entrenched as the state's preferred electoral mechanism, that the only alternatives are as follows:
    1) Revolution
    2) Ad hoc paper-vote
    3) Ad hoc p2p e-vote

    The first is extremely expensive. The second relies upon cooperation by the state and an ambulatorily motivated electorate. The third is a fricking doddle in comparison.

    cf http://blogs.zdnet.com/digitalID/?p=78
  • Ned Ulbricht

    Latest news...


    From US ACM Policy Blog TGDC Reverses Course, Finishes Meeting (5 Dec 2005):

    As I suggested in yesterday's post the Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) did revisit the software independent proposal during today's session. It was the first item, and by unanimous consent a revised resolution was approved requiring that the next generation of voting machines approved under the next Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG). The revisions, as best as I can tell, were meant to address two main concerns from yesterday's session.


    Anne Broache, CNET, confirms this news under the headline “Panel changes course, approves e-voting checks”. (Hat tip Jim Horning.)


    And Michael Hickins, internetnews.com, reporting under the headline “Election Officials Adopt Compromise on Standards”, adds that:

    According to persons familiar with the situation, Rivest spent the evening lobbying members of the TGDC and crafted compromise language that was passed unanimously this morning.



    So a cheer for Ron Rivest.
  • Today the panel approved a more watered-down recommendation, which would apply the software independence requirement only to new machines. I don't know whether "new machines" means new units or new models.

    http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle...
  • Those of us prone to cynicism about democracy never find any shortage of reasons to be cynical! The powers that be just keep proving to us time after time that it's largely just a facade. The truth is, they are not concerned about how this might undermine the legitimacy of the elected government because the "elected government" is simply too well-protected by a myriad number of laws ranging from the districting system to the limit on the size of the House of Representatives to McCain-Feingold.
blog comments powered by Disqus