
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software Patent of the Week: NTP is Baaaack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/comment-page-1/#comment-35883</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/#comment-35883</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll disagree with Noel Le.  The main problem was the original grant of the patent.  The Judge failed to correct the problem but was not the root cause. The Judge did err in excluding evidence he did not understand.  The CAFC test for injunctions (pre eBay and MercExchange) contributed to the ultimate travesty.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll disagree with Noel Le.  The main problem was the original grant of the patent.  The Judge failed to correct the problem but was not the root cause. The Judge did err in excluding evidence he did not understand.  The CAFC test for injunctions (pre eBay and MercExchange) contributed to the ultimate travesty.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/comment-page-1/#comment-54152</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/#comment-54152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll disagree with Noel Le.  The main problem was the original grant of the patent.  The Judge failed to correct the problem but was not the root cause. The Judge did err in excluding evidence he did not understand.  The CAFC test for injunctions (pre eBay and MercExchange) contributed to the ultimate travesty.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll disagree with Noel Le.  The main problem was the original grant of the patent.  The Judge failed to correct the problem but was not the root cause. The Judge did err in excluding evidence he did not understand.  The CAFC test for injunctions (pre eBay and MercExchange) contributed to the ultimate travesty.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Le</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/comment-page-1/#comment-35882</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/#comment-35882</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tim, this case is less an issue with the patent system as it is about some judge (and every patent lawyer I talk to says &quot;THATS JUDGE!) who decided to curtail incoming evidence (from the USPTO) that would change the very basis of the case to begin with.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, this case is less an issue with the patent system as it is about some judge (and every patent lawyer I talk to says &#8220;THATS JUDGE!) who decided to curtail incoming evidence (from the USPTO) that would change the very basis of the case to begin with.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Le</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/comment-page-1/#comment-54151</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/10/software-patent-of-the-week-ntp-is-baaaack/#comment-54151</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tim, this case is less an issue with the patent system as it is about some judge (and every patent lawyer I talk to says &quot;THATS JUDGE!) who decided to curtail incoming evidence (from the USPTO) that would change the very basis of the case to begin with.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, this case is less an issue with the patent system as it is about some judge (and every patent lawyer I talk to says &#8220;THATS JUDGE!) who decided to curtail incoming evidence (from the USPTO) that would change the very basis of the case to begin with.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

