
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lost Laptop Follies, Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R.</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-35781</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/#comment-35781</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes Magazine, Sept. 7, 2006, ran an article: &lt;i&gt;&quot;Laptop Hall of Shame&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.  While this article details, as you note, government laptop faux pas; it also goes into detail concerning the lack of corporate data laptop security.  Robert Ellis Smith, of Forbes, wrote: &lt;i&gt;&quot;The monthly newsletter I publish, Privacy Journal, reported 24 serious instances of Social Security numbers and other sensitive data compromised through stolen or lost laptops in 2006. The newsletter called it the &quot;Lost or Stolen Laptops Hall of Shame.&quot; And we still have four months left in 2006. There were at least ten incidents during the final four months of 2005. &lt;b&gt;All these incidents involved companies that handle personal information routinely. (Apparently too routinely!)&lt;/b&gt;&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (emphasis added) Clearly, the lack of security is not just a government problem, it is a universal problem. In developing a policy responsive to this issue we need to also acknowledge in any proposed policy the failure of corporations to take proactive action.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forbes Magazine, Sept. 7, 2006, ran an article: <i>&#8220;Laptop Hall of Shame&#8221;</i>.  While this article details, as you note, government laptop faux pas; it also goes into detail concerning the lack of corporate data laptop security.  Robert Ellis Smith, of Forbes, wrote: <i>&#8220;The monthly newsletter I publish, Privacy Journal, reported 24 serious instances of Social Security numbers and other sensitive data compromised through stolen or lost laptops in 2006. The newsletter called it the &#8220;Lost or Stolen Laptops Hall of Shame.&#8221; And we still have four months left in 2006. There were at least ten incidents during the final four months of 2005. <b>All these incidents involved companies that handle personal information routinely. (Apparently too routinely!)</b>&#8220;</i> (emphasis added) Clearly, the lack of security is not just a government problem, it is a universal problem. In developing a policy responsive to this issue we need to also acknowledge in any proposed policy the failure of corporations to take proactive action.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R.</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-53050</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/#comment-53050</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Forbes Magazine, Sept. 7, 2006, ran an article: &lt;i&gt;&quot;Laptop Hall of Shame&quot;&lt;/i&gt;.  While this article details, as you note, government laptop faux pas; it also goes into detail concerning the lack of corporate data laptop security.  Robert Ellis Smith, of Forbes, wrote: &lt;i&gt;&quot;The monthly newsletter I publish, Privacy Journal, reported 24 serious instances of Social Security numbers and other sensitive data compromised through stolen or lost laptops in 2006. The newsletter called it the &quot;Lost or Stolen Laptops Hall of Shame.&quot; And we still have four months left in 2006. There were at least ten incidents during the final four months of 2005. &lt;b&gt;All these incidents involved companies that handle personal information routinely. (Apparently too routinely!)&lt;/b&gt;&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (emphasis added) Clearly, the lack of security is not just a government problem, it is a universal problem. In developing a policy responsive to this issue we need to also acknowledge in any proposed policy the failure of corporations to take proactive action.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forbes Magazine, Sept. 7, 2006, ran an article: <i>&#8220;Laptop Hall of Shame&#8221;</i>.  While this article details, as you note, government laptop faux pas; it also goes into detail concerning the lack of corporate data laptop security.  Robert Ellis Smith, of Forbes, wrote: <i>&#8220;The monthly newsletter I publish, Privacy Journal, reported 24 serious instances of Social Security numbers and other sensitive data compromised through stolen or lost laptops in 2006. The newsletter called it the &#8220;Lost or Stolen Laptops Hall of Shame.&#8221; And we still have four months left in 2006. There were at least ten incidents during the final four months of 2005. <b>All these incidents involved companies that handle personal information routinely. (Apparently too routinely!)</b>&#8220;</i> (emphasis added) Clearly, the lack of security is not just a government problem, it is a universal problem. In developing a policy responsive to this issue we need to also acknowledge in any proposed policy the failure of corporations to take proactive action.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Kunze</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-35780</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Kunze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/#comment-35780</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I flew from American Airlines on 9/9/06 from LaGuardia to ORD.  I checked 2 bags.  When I got home and opened the bags, where I had stored my computer laptop there was a notice saying &quot;NOTICE OF BAGGAGE INSPECTION&quot;.  My Laptop was gone.  I called TSA on 9/10 AM.  I filled out a form.  I heard from them Nov. 3.  They are offering me $312.85.  The computer cost me $1,400.  The letter asks me to check one of 2 boxes: &quot;I ACCEPT this offer&quot; OR &quot;I REJECT this offer completely and do not wish to negotitate a settlement.  I understand that by checking this option, my administrative claim will be denied&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do you know of a lawsuit against TSA???&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I flew from American Airlines on 9/9/06 from LaGuardia to ORD.  I checked 2 bags.  When I got home and opened the bags, where I had stored my computer laptop there was a notice saying &#8220;NOTICE OF BAGGAGE INSPECTION&#8221;.  My Laptop was gone.  I called TSA on 9/10 AM.  I filled out a form.  I heard from them Nov. 3.  They are offering me $312.85.  The computer cost me $1,400.  The letter asks me to check one of 2 boxes: &#8220;I ACCEPT this offer&#8221; OR &#8220;I REJECT this offer completely and do not wish to negotitate a settlement.  I understand that by checking this option, my administrative claim will be denied&#8221;</p>

<p>Do you know of a lawsuit against TSA???</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Kunze</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-53049</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Kunze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/#comment-53049</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I flew from American Airlines on 9/9/06 from LaGuardia to ORD.  I checked 2 bags.  When I got home and opened the bags, where I had stored my computer laptop there was a notice saying &quot;NOTICE OF BAGGAGE INSPECTION&quot;.  My Laptop was gone.  I called TSA on 9/10 AM.  I filled out a form.  I heard from them Nov. 3.  They are offering me $312.85.  The computer cost me $1,400.  The letter asks me to check one of 2 boxes: &quot;I ACCEPT this offer&quot; OR &quot;I REJECT this offer completely and do not wish to negotitate a settlement.  I understand that by checking this option, my administrative claim will be denied&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you know of a lawsuit against TSA???&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I flew from American Airlines on 9/9/06 from LaGuardia to ORD.  I checked 2 bags.  When I got home and opened the bags, where I had stored my computer laptop there was a notice saying &#8220;NOTICE OF BAGGAGE INSPECTION&#8221;.  My Laptop was gone.  I called TSA on 9/10 AM.  I filled out a form.  I heard from them Nov. 3.  They are offering me $312.85.  The computer cost me $1,400.  The letter asks me to check one of 2 boxes: &#8220;I ACCEPT this offer&#8221; OR &#8220;I REJECT this offer completely and do not wish to negotitate a settlement.  I understand that by checking this option, my administrative claim will be denied&#8221;<br /><br />Do you know of a lawsuit against TSA???</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Villa</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-35779</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Villa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/#comment-35779</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So Adam, where is the post when &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061103/ap_on_bi_ge/starbucks_missing_laptops&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;private industry loses ten times that many names and socials?&lt;/a&gt; I&#039;m not trying to minimize the problem when government does this, but your framing makes it sound as if this is merely a government problem- which is manifestly untrue, and has policy implications.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Adam, where is the post when <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061103/ap_on_bi_ge/starbucks_missing_laptops" rel="nofollow">private industry loses ten times that many names and socials?</a> I&#8217;m not trying to minimize the problem when government does this, but your framing makes it sound as if this is merely a government problem- which is manifestly untrue, and has policy implications.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Villa</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-53048</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Villa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/11/03/lost-laptop-follies-part-3/#comment-53048</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So Adam, where is the post when &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061103/ap_on_bi_ge/starbucks_missing_laptops&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;private industry loses ten times that many names and socials?&lt;/a&gt; I&#039;m not trying to minimize the problem when government does this, but your framing makes it sound as if this is merely a government problem- which is manifestly untrue, and has policy implications.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Adam, where is the post when <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061103/ap_on_bi_ge/starbucks_missing_laptops" rel="nofollow">private industry loses ten times that many names and socials?</a> I&#8217;m not trying to minimize the problem when government does this, but your framing makes it sound as if this is merely a government problem- which is manifestly untrue, and has policy implications.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

