Comments on: FCC Comm. Adelstein on Indecency http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:25:50 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: MikeT http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/comment-page-1/#comment-49217 MikeT Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:36:17 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/#comment-49217 Ummm, enigma_foundry, they're hoping for the power to regulate to go away. Ummm, enigma_foundry, they’re hoping for the power to regulate to go away.

]]> By: MikeT http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/comment-page-1/#comment-34760 MikeT Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:36:17 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/#comment-34760 Ummm, enigma_foundry, they're hoping for the power to regulate to go away. Ummm, enigma_foundry, they’re hoping for the power to regulate to go away.

]]> By: eee_eff http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/comment-page-1/#comment-49216 eee_eff Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:00:13 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/#comment-49216 <i> We may forever lose the ability to prevent the airing of indecent material, barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment."<br><p><br>Of course, some of us are hoping (and predicting) that that's exactly what will happen!</p></i><br><p><br>Adam, so you're finally out of the closet, hoping that there will be a Constitutional Amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.<br></p><p><br>I had sensed that some of the posters at TLF and almost all of those at IPCentral felt this way, but they would never come out and say it. They would never address the issues that I would raise regarding First Amendment problems with the positions they take, and now I understand why...They are hoping the First Amendment will go away....</p> We may forever lose the ability to prevent the airing of indecent material, barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.”

Of course, some of us are hoping (and predicting) that that’s exactly what will happen!

Adam, so you’re finally out of the closet, hoping that there will be a Constitutional Amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.

I had sensed that some of the posters at TLF and almost all of those at IPCentral felt this way, but they would never come out and say it. They would never address the issues that I would raise regarding First Amendment problems with the positions they take, and now I understand why…They are hoping the First Amendment will go away….

]]> By: enigma_foundry http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/comment-page-1/#comment-34759 enigma_foundry Wed, 30 Aug 2006 03:00:13 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/#comment-34759 <i> We may forever lose the ability to prevent the airing of indecent material, barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment." <p> Of course, some of us are hoping (and predicting) that that's exactly what will happen!</p></i> <p> Adam, so you're finally out of the closet, hoping that there will be a Constitutional Amendment setting limits on the First Amendment. <p> I had sensed that some of the posters at TLF and almost all of those at IPCentral felt this way, but they would never come out and say it. They would never address the issues that I would raise regarding First Amendment problems with the positions they take, and now I understand why...They are hoping the First Amendment will go away....</p></p> We may forever lose the ability to prevent the airing of indecent material, barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.”

Of course, some of us are hoping (and predicting) that that’s exactly what will happen!

Adam, so you’re finally out of the closet, hoping that there will be a Constitutional Amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.

I had sensed that some of the posters at TLF and almost all of those at IPCentral felt this way, but they would never come out and say it. They would never address the issues that I would raise regarding First Amendment problems with the positions they take, and now I understand why…They are hoping the First Amendment will go away….

]]> By: Tony http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/comment-page-1/#comment-49215 Tony Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:17:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/#comment-49215 <i>...barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.</i><br><br>In other words, Commissioner Adelstein is suggesting that such a constitutional amendment would be the only legal way for the FCC to do what it's already doing. Wonderful logic. …barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.

In other words, Commissioner Adelstein is suggesting that such a constitutional amendment would be the only legal way for the FCC to do what it’s already doing. Wonderful logic.

]]> By: Tony http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/comment-page-1/#comment-34758 Tony Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:17:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/28/fcc-comm-adelstein-on-indecency/#comment-34758 <i>...barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.</i> In other words, Commissioner Adelstein is suggesting that such a constitutional amendment would be the only legal way for the FCC to do what it's already doing. Wonderful logic. …barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.

In other words, Commissioner Adelstein is suggesting that such a constitutional amendment would be the only legal way for the FCC to do what it’s already doing. Wonderful logic.

]]>