Comments on: Larry Scantlebury, RIP http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: fermasserdd http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-34489 fermasserdd Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:27:04 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-34489 <p><a href=" http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/ " rel="nofollow"> lesbian porn </a></p> http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/ ” rel=”nofollow”> lesbian porn

]]> By: fermasserdd http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-55353 fermasserdd Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:27:04 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-55353 <p><a href=" <a href="http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/">http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/</a> " rel="nofollow"> lesbian porn </a></p> <a href=” http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/ ” rel=”nofollow”> lesbian porn

]]> By: fermasserdd http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-34488 fermasserdd Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:26:44 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-34488 <p><a href=" http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/ " rel="nofollow"> lesbian porn </a></p> http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/ ” rel=”nofollow”> lesbian porn

]]> By: fermasserdd http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-55352 fermasserdd Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:26:44 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-55352 <p><a href=" <a href="http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/">http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/</a> " rel="nofollow"> lesbian porn </a></p> <a href=” http://www.1001nights.net/free-porn-movies/ ” rel=”nofollow”> lesbian porn

]]> By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-34487 tramadol Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:30:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-34487 <p>81e31de21f46 Hello! http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol</p> 81e31de21f46 Hello! http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol

]]> By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-55351 tramadol Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:30:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-55351 <p>81e31de21f46 Hello! <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav">http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav</a> tramadol</p> 81e31de21f46 Hello! http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol

]]> By: short url http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-34486 short url Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:12:34 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-34486 <p>ded44538eca6 Nice site http:/0zu.tw/ short url</p> ded44538eca6 Nice site http:/0zu.tw/ short url

]]> By: short url http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-55350 short url Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:12:34 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-55350 <p>ded44538eca6 Nice site http:/0zu.tw/ short url</p> ded44538eca6 Nice site http:/0zu.tw/ short url

]]> By: Pepe http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-55349 Pepe Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:45:48 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-55349 <p>Los de la RIAA son unos HIJOS DE PUTA, MALNACIDOS Y MALPARIDOS, COGIDOS POR EL CULO POR SU DESEO DESMEDIDO DE DINERO... QUE SE PUDRAN!!!</p> Los de la RIAA son unos HIJOS DE PUTA, MALNACIDOS Y MALPARIDOS, COGIDOS POR EL CULO POR SU DESEO DESMEDIDO DE DINERO… QUE SE PUDRAN!!!

]]> By: Pepe http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-34485 Pepe Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:45:48 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-34485 <p>Los de la RIAA son unos HIJOS DE PUTA, MALNACIDOS Y MALPARIDOS, COGIDOS POR EL CULO POR SU DESEO DESMEDIDO DE DINERO... QUE SE PUDRAN!!!</p> Los de la RIAA son unos HIJOS DE PUTA, MALNACIDOS Y MALPARIDOS, COGIDOS POR EL CULO POR SU DESEO DESMEDIDO DE DINERO… QUE SE PUDRAN!!!

]]> By: zi http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-55348 zi Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:56:07 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-55348 <p>Jerry, I don't understand how you don't get the criticism that is all over the net toward the RIAA. In addition to suing dead people (Mr. Scantlebury and Gertrude Walton), the RIAA has sued children (Brittany Chan), single moms, grandparents, people on welfare and disability support, and even those who don't own PC's or computers capable of running Kazaa (Sarah Seabury). The RIAA has shown that its investigative techniques are shoddy, to say the least, and lacking in human decency in many of the cases, by maliciously prosecuting children and the elderly.<br><br>As an update, the RIAA has dropped "this particular lawsuit" against the late Mr. Scantlebury after an "abundance of sensitivity" (which is their spin on the widespread outrage generated by the news, all over the internet).<br><br><a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2006/08/report-that-riaa-has-dropped-this.html">http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2...</a></p> Jerry, I don’t understand how you don’t get the criticism that is all over the net toward the RIAA. In addition to suing dead people (Mr. Scantlebury and Gertrude Walton), the RIAA has sued children (Brittany Chan), single moms, grandparents, people on welfare and disability support, and even those who don’t own PC’s or computers capable of running Kazaa (Sarah Seabury). The RIAA has shown that its investigative techniques are shoddy, to say the least, and lacking in human decency in many of the cases, by maliciously prosecuting children and the elderly.

As an update, the RIAA has dropped “this particular lawsuit” against the late Mr. Scantlebury after an “abundance of sensitivity” (which is their spin on the widespread outrage generated by the news, all over the internet).

http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2…

]]> By: zi http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-34484 zi Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:56:07 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-34484 <p>Jerry, I don't understand how you don't get the criticism that is all over the net toward the RIAA. In addition to suing dead people (Mr. Scantlebury and Gertrude Walton), the RIAA has sued children (Brittany Chan), single moms, grandparents, people on welfare and disability support, and even those who don't own PC's or computers capable of running Kazaa (Sarah Seabury). The RIAA has shown that its investigative techniques are shoddy, to say the least, and lacking in human decency in many of the cases, by maliciously prosecuting children and the elderly.</p> <p>As an update, the RIAA has dropped "this particular lawsuit" against the late Mr. Scantlebury after an "abundance of sensitivity" (which is their spin on the widespread outrage generated by the news, all over the internet).</p> <p>http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2006/08/report-that-riaa-has-dropped-this.html</p> Jerry, I don’t understand how you don’t get the criticism that is all over the net toward the RIAA. In addition to suing dead people (Mr. Scantlebury and Gertrude Walton), the RIAA has sued children (Brittany Chan), single moms, grandparents, people on welfare and disability support, and even those who don’t own PC’s or computers capable of running Kazaa (Sarah Seabury). The RIAA has shown that its investigative techniques are shoddy, to say the least, and lacking in human decency in many of the cases, by maliciously prosecuting children and the elderly.

As an update, the RIAA has dropped “this particular lawsuit” against the late Mr. Scantlebury after an “abundance of sensitivity” (which is their spin on the widespread outrage generated by the news, all over the internet).

http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2006/08/report-that-riaa-has-dropped-this.html

]]> By: Tim Lee http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-55347 Tim Lee Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:17:34 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-55347 <p>It seems to me that the decent thing to do would be to drop the case. A big part of the justification for the lawsuits is deterrence, after all, and it's hard to deter a corpse. I doubt they're going to take pleasure in deposing the kids, but that doesn't make it any less callous.</p> It seems to me that the decent thing to do would be to drop the case. A big part of the justification for the lawsuits is deterrence, after all, and it’s hard to deter a corpse. I doubt they’re going to take pleasure in deposing the kids, but that doesn’t make it any less callous.

]]> By: Jerry Brito http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-55346 Jerry Brito Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:56:30 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-55346 <p>I don't get this criticism, which I've seen all over the net. For better or worse, the RIAA had a lawsuit pending against the deceased that it will now continue to pursue against the estate. If a 60-day stay is not long enough, how much is?<br><br>The RIAA should be questioned on the legality of its claims, and perhaps whether it's smart for them to follow a strategy of suing consumers. But is it really necessary to demonize them? Are they really ogres that take pleasure in deposing kids after their father has died? I doubt it.</p> I don’t get this criticism, which I’ve seen all over the net. For better or worse, the RIAA had a lawsuit pending against the deceased that it will now continue to pursue against the estate. If a 60-day stay is not long enough, how much is?

The RIAA should be questioned on the legality of its claims, and perhaps whether it’s smart for them to follow a strategy of suing consumers. But is it really necessary to demonize them? Are they really ogres that take pleasure in deposing kids after their father has died? I doubt it.

]]> By: Tim Lee http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-34483 Tim Lee Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:17:34 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-34483 <p>It seems to me that the decent thing to do would be to drop the case. A big part of the justification for the lawsuits is deterrence, after all, and it's hard to deter a corpse. I doubt they're going to take pleasure in deposing the kids, but that doesn't make it any less callous.</p> It seems to me that the decent thing to do would be to drop the case. A big part of the justification for the lawsuits is deterrence, after all, and it’s hard to deter a corpse. I doubt they’re going to take pleasure in deposing the kids, but that doesn’t make it any less callous.

]]> By: Jerry Brito http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-34482 Jerry Brito Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:56:30 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-34482 <p>I don't get this criticism, which I've seen all over the net. For better or worse, the RIAA had a lawsuit pending against the deceased that it will now continue to pursue against the estate. If a 60-day stay is not long enough, how much is?</p> <p>The RIAA should be questioned on the legality of its claims, and perhaps whether it's smart for them to follow a strategy of suing consumers. But is it really necessary to demonize them? Are they really ogres that take pleasure in deposing kids after their father has died? I doubt it.</p> I don’t get this criticism, which I’ve seen all over the net. For better or worse, the RIAA had a lawsuit pending against the deceased that it will now continue to pursue against the estate. If a 60-day stay is not long enough, how much is?

The RIAA should be questioned on the legality of its claims, and perhaps whether it’s smart for them to follow a strategy of suing consumers. But is it really necessary to demonize them? Are they really ogres that take pleasure in deposing kids after their father has died? I doubt it.

]]> By: eee_eff http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-55345 eee_eff Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:11:47 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-55345 <p>The RIAA is in a lose-lose situation with these cases. But they have put themselves there. I have little pity on them, as they collapse their existing business model into one strategy of suing their customers.<br></p> <p><br>There have been several companies that went out on a strategy of suing their customers, and it never ended pretty. Take SCO for example, out there, twisting in the wind...<br></p> <p><br>The RIAA claims illegal downloads are hurting them: I would claim that is their members failure to conceive of a sustainable business model which takes into account the existence of the digital landscape (and yes that includes the existence of black market and grey market activities) But, the RIAA doesn't even have to think anymore because, lo and behold <a href="http://www.allofmp3.com">www.allofmp3.com</a> has shown them the path forward:<br></p> <p><br>It's called reasonably priced downloads....<br></p> The RIAA is in a lose-lose situation with these cases. But they have put themselves there. I have little pity on them, as they collapse their existing business model into one strategy of suing their customers.


There have been several companies that went out on a strategy of suing their customers, and it never ended pretty. Take SCO for example, out there, twisting in the wind…


The RIAA claims illegal downloads are hurting them: I would claim that is their members failure to conceive of a sustainable business model which takes into account the existence of the digital landscape (and yes that includes the existence of black market and grey market activities) But, the RIAA doesn’t even have to think anymore because, lo and behold http://www.allofmp3.com has shown them the path forward:


It’s called reasonably priced downloads….

]]> By: enigma_foundry http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/comment-page-1/#comment-34481 enigma_foundry Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:11:47 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/08/13/larry-scantlebury-rip/#comment-34481 <p>The RIAA is in a lose-lose situation with these cases. But they have put themselves there. I have little pity on them, as they collapse their existing business model into one strategy of suing their customers.</p> <p> There have been several companies that went out on a strategy of suing their customers, and it never ended pretty. Take SCO for example, out there, twisting in the wind... <p> The RIAA claims illegal downloads are hurting them: I would claim that is their members failure to conceive of a sustainable business model which takes into account the existence of the digital landscape (and yes that includes the existence of black market and grey market activities) But, the RIAA doesn't even have to think anymore because, lo and behold www.allofmp3.com has shown them the path forward: <p> It's called reasonably priced downloads.... </p></p></p> The RIAA is in a lose-lose situation with these cases. But they have put themselves there. I have little pity on them, as they collapse their existing business model into one strategy of suing their customers.

There have been several companies that went out on a strategy of suing their customers, and it never ended pretty. Take SCO for example, out there, twisting in the wind…

The RIAA claims illegal downloads are hurting them: I would claim that is their members failure to conceive of a sustainable business model which takes into account the existence of the digital landscape (and yes that includes the existence of black market and grey market activities) But, the RIAA doesn’t even have to think anymore because, lo and behold http://www.allofmp3.com has shown them the path forward:

It’s called reasonably priced downloads….

]]>