Framing the Copyright Debate

by Tim Lee on August 13, 2006 · Comments

Luis Villa just pointed me to this excellent review in the Wall Street Journal of Larry Lessig’s Free Culture:

Free Culture, in short, is an insightful, entertaining brief for changing our copyright policy. There is just one problem. Mr. Lessig aims most of his arguments at people like himself­standard-issue Howard Dean liberals. Bad choice. He should be talking to conservatives. Viewed up close, copyright bears little resemblance to the kinds of property that conservatives value. Instead, it looks like a constantly expanding government program run for the benefit of a noisy, well-organized interest group­like Superfund, say, or dairy subsidies, except that the benefits go not to endangered homeowners or hardworking farmers but to the likes of Barbra Streisand and Eminem.

It looks like Superfund in other ways, too. Copyright is a trial lawyer’s dream­a regulatory program enforced by private lawsuits where the plaintiffs have all the advantages, from injury-free damages awards to liability doctrines that extract damages from anyone who was in the neighborhood when an infringement occurred.

Quite so. The advocates of constantly expanding the scope of copyright have managed to cloak their rent-seeking agenda in the mantle of free markets and private property. And unfortunately, most of their critics have made it easy by deploying left-wing rhetoric. The result is that most people on the right-hand side of the political spectrum–the side that’s in power in Washington right now–reflexively line up with the rent seekers, not because they’ve given the issue any real thought, but simply because they perceive them as being on “their side.”

But if “conservative” is understood in the Barry Goldwater/Ronald Reagan mold of limited government and free markets, there’s nothing conservative about the copyright cartel’s agenda. Advocates of sensible copyright laws desperately need to find ways to talk about their agenda that Republicans, conservatives, and libertarians find more appealing.

Comments Posted in: Copyright

  • Didn't much of the current IP regime arise under Clinton?

    The Bono Act (extending copyright) and DMCA passed under Clinton, but by a Republican Senate and House. Inasmuch as this is a political problem, neither party is doing the right thing. But it has mostly been a judicial/PTO problem, not executive-level. Strongly recommend reading the excellent Digital Copyright for a good history of the problem in the copyright space, and Innovation and its Discontents for a similar background on the patent side.
  • Lessig has toned down in recent years, becoming more moderate and considered in his views. Its good to see this of someone as capable of reaching diverse audiences as he.

    Didn't much of the current IP regime arise under Clinton?
  • Tim, it's much easier said that done. My own experiences in that direction have been very unpleasant. Lessig is regularly distorted, to the point that his actual very moderate position sometimes seems irrelevant to the ideological rant that (some) Republicans, conservatives, and libertarians want to write.

    It's just hard to form alliances across ideological lines. Political crossover is a pundit's dream in proposing, and an activist's nightmare in execution, when crossover in theory becomes crossfire in practice.
  • Advocates of sensible copyright laws desperately need to find ways to talk about their agenda that Republicans, conservatives, and libertarians find more appealing.


    Bullshit. Overturning the copyright cartel is one of the things that is going to make the revolution that much more fun!

  • Perfect right up to the word 'Ronald' who was for limited government and free markets in just the way the copyright cartel is -- superficial rhetoric only.

    I think the main opportunity is not for left-leaning copyright reformers to make inroads with free marketeers but for some of the latter to be entrepreneurs, loosely speaking, in opening up the ripe field of IP critique and reform from a free-market perspective.

    In other words, clone yourself. :)
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: