Comments on: Write What You Know http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Fri, 25 May 2012 18:27:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-34265 tramadol Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:40:37 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/#comment-34265 <p>81e31de21f46 Great work <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol</p> 81e31de21f46 Great work tramadol tramadol

]]> By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-53034 tramadol Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:40:37 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/#comment-53034 <p>81e31de21f46 Great work <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol</p> 81e31de21f46 Great work tramadol tramadol

]]> By: Anonymous http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-34264 Anonymous Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:03:44 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/#comment-34264 <p>e283ca27b196 Great work</p> e283ca27b196 Great work

]]> By: Anonymous http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-53033 Anonymous Mon, 08 Jan 2007 07:03:44 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/#comment-53033 <p>e283ca27b196 Great work</p> e283ca27b196 Great work

]]> By: free http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-34263 free Mon, 25 Dec 2006 08:06:23 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/#comment-34263 <p>0c506e80c743 Great work <a href="http://www.alphacentavr.info/" rel="nofollow">free</a> free</p> 0c506e80c743 Great work free free

]]> By: free http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-53032 free Mon, 25 Dec 2006 08:06:23 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/#comment-53032 <p>0c506e80c743 Great work <a href="http://www.alphacentavr.info/" rel="nofollow">free</a> free</p> 0c506e80c743 Great work free free

]]> By: Joe Gratz http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-53031 Joe Gratz Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:24:52 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/#comment-53031 <p>"Kings of A&R;" is down, but the Google cache is <a href="http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:Me27joU0crMJ:www.kingsofar.com/2006/07/27/why-you-hate-net-neutrality-if-you-love-copyright-by-chris-castle/+%22granddaughter+as+it+does+their+granddaughter+to+illegally%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">here</a>.<br><br>Chris Castle is an extremely smart guy and a great music lawyer; in his posts to the Pho list, he has consistently impressed me. But this post is pretty far from the mark. BitTorrent doesn't use a lot of bandwidth because it has high overhead; it uses a lot of bandwidth because it's efficient. Does Mr. Castle just want the bandwidth to sit there unused? He then notes that many BitTorrent and p2p connections are excruciatingly slow as it is. But how does this move his argument forward?<br><br>Furthermore, even if you believe, as Castle seems to, that encryption is a sure sign of dastardly deeds, it certainly isn't "a form of hacking." What a curious thing to say.<br><br>His central point -- that net neutrality is bad because it doesn't let us make the legal packets go faster than the illegal packets -- is not a crazy one, though it is mistaken. But his rhetoric is awfully overblown.</p> “Kings of A&R;” is down, but the Google cache is here.

Chris Castle is an extremely smart guy and a great music lawyer; in his posts to the Pho list, he has consistently impressed me. But this post is pretty far from the mark. BitTorrent doesn’t use a lot of bandwidth because it has high overhead; it uses a lot of bandwidth because it’s efficient. Does Mr. Castle just want the bandwidth to sit there unused? He then notes that many BitTorrent and p2p connections are excruciatingly slow as it is. But how does this move his argument forward?

Furthermore, even if you believe, as Castle seems to, that encryption is a sure sign of dastardly deeds, it certainly isn’t “a form of hacking.” What a curious thing to say.

His central point — that net neutrality is bad because it doesn’t let us make the legal packets go faster than the illegal packets — is not a crazy one, though it is mistaken. But his rhetoric is awfully overblown.

]]> By: Joe Gratz http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/comment-page-1/#comment-34262 Joe Gratz Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:24:52 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/07/31/write-what-you-know/#comment-34262 <p>"Kings of A&R" is down, but the Google cache is <a href="http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:Me27joU0crMJ:www.kingsofar.com/2006/07/27/why-you-hate-net-neutrality-if-you-love-copyright-by-chris-castle/+%22granddaughter+as+it+does+their+granddaughter+to+illegally%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p> <p>Chris Castle is an extremely smart guy and a great music lawyer; in his posts to the Pho list, he has consistently impressed me. But this post is pretty far from the mark. BitTorrent doesn't use a lot of bandwidth because it has high overhead; it uses a lot of bandwidth because it's efficient. Does Mr. Castle just want the bandwidth to sit there unused? He then notes that many BitTorrent and p2p connections are excruciatingly slow as it is. But how does this move his argument forward?</p> <p>Furthermore, even if you believe, as Castle seems to, that encryption is a sure sign of dastardly deeds, it certainly isn't "a form of hacking." What a curious thing to say.</p> <p>His central point -- that net neutrality is bad because it doesn't let us make the legal packets go faster than the illegal packets -- is not a crazy one, though it is mistaken. But his rhetoric is awfully overblown.</p> “Kings of A&R” is down, but the Google cache is here.

Chris Castle is an extremely smart guy and a great music lawyer; in his posts to the Pho list, he has consistently impressed me. But this post is pretty far from the mark. BitTorrent doesn’t use a lot of bandwidth because it has high overhead; it uses a lot of bandwidth because it’s efficient. Does Mr. Castle just want the bandwidth to sit there unused? He then notes that many BitTorrent and p2p connections are excruciatingly slow as it is. But how does this move his argument forward?

Furthermore, even if you believe, as Castle seems to, that encryption is a sure sign of dastardly deeds, it certainly isn’t “a form of hacking.” What a curious thing to say.

His central point — that net neutrality is bad because it doesn’t let us make the legal packets go faster than the illegal packets — is not a crazy one, though it is mistaken. But his rhetoric is awfully overblown.

]]>