
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freezing the &#8216;Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xplat</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-50686</link>
		<dc:creator>xplat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-50686</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;(Sorry for the late comment, but there was something here I didn&#039;t want to let sit...)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Er ... there&#039;s also the fact that, when not constrained strongly by size, a multipurpose device like a cellphone looks considerably different in shape.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, it&#039;s shaped almost exactly like a PC.  Funny, that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, CodeMonkeySteve ... when my ISP stops blocking internet protocols I want to use, maybe I&#039;ll be convinced there&#039;s enough broadband competition to prevent them from doing &#039;something stupid.&#039;  So from where I sit, I&#039;ll be seeing what I can do to get DSL or FIOS penetration into my area ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Sorry for the late comment, but there was something here I didn&#8217;t want to let sit&#8230;)<br /><br />Er &#8230; there&#8217;s also the fact that, when not constrained strongly by size, a multipurpose device like a cellphone looks considerably different in shape.<br /><br />In fact, it&#8217;s shaped almost exactly like a PC.  Funny, that.<br /><br />And, CodeMonkeySteve &#8230; when my ISP stops blocking internet protocols I want to use, maybe I&#8217;ll be convinced there&#8217;s enough broadband competition to prevent them from doing &#8216;something stupid.&#8217;  So from where I sit, I&#8217;ll be seeing what I can do to get DSL or FIOS penetration into my area &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xplat</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-33792</link>
		<dc:creator>xplat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-33792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;(Sorry for the late comment, but there was something here I didn&#039;t want to let sit...)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Er ... there&#039;s also the fact that, when not constrained strongly by size, a multipurpose device like a cellphone looks considerably different in shape.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In fact, it&#039;s shaped almost exactly like a PC.  Funny, that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And, CodeMonkeySteve ... when my ISP stops blocking internet protocols I want to use, maybe I&#039;ll be convinced there&#039;s enough broadband competition to prevent them from doing &#039;something stupid.&#039;  So from where I sit, I&#039;ll be seeing what I can do to get DSL or FIOS penetration into my area ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Sorry for the late comment, but there was something here I didn&#8217;t want to let sit&#8230;)</p>

<p>Er &#8230; there&#8217;s also the fact that, when not constrained strongly by size, a multipurpose device like a cellphone looks considerably different in shape.</p>

<p>In fact, it&#8217;s shaped almost exactly like a PC.  Funny, that.</p>

<p>And, CodeMonkeySteve &#8230; when my ISP stops blocking internet protocols I want to use, maybe I&#8217;ll be convinced there&#8217;s enough broadband competition to prevent them from doing &#8216;something stupid.&#8217;  So from where I sit, I&#8217;ll be seeing what I can do to get DSL or FIOS penetration into my area &#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeMonkeySteve</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-50685</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeMonkeySteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-50685</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The article goes on to argue that the real issue is the lack of competition in the broadband market.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One point a lot of people seem to miss is that &quot;sufficient competition&quot; doesn&#039;t mean that everyone must have access to at least two telcos, in case one does something bad.  All you need is enough options for enough people so that the threat of large numbers of customers leaving will disuade any ISP from doing something stupid (like throttling Google traffic unless you pay more).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From where I sit, we&#039;ve already surpassed that level of broadband adoption, so there&#039;s not much to worry about.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>The article goes on to argue that the real issue is the lack of competition in the broadband market.</blockquote>

<p><br /></p>

<p><br /><br />One point a lot of people seem to miss is that &#8220;sufficient competition&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean that everyone must have access to at least two telcos, in case one does something bad.  All you need is enough options for enough people so that the threat of large numbers of customers leaving will disuade any ISP from doing something stupid (like throttling Google traffic unless you pay more).<br /></p>

<p><br /><br />From where I sit, we&#8217;ve already surpassed that level of broadband adoption, so there&#8217;s not much to worry about.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeMonkeySteve</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-33791</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeMonkeySteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-33791</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The article goes on to argue that the real issue is the lack of competition in the broadband market.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;

One point a lot of people seem to miss is that &quot;sufficient competition&quot; doesn&#039;t mean that everyone must have access to at least two telcos, in case one does something bad.  All you need is enough options for enough people so that the threat of large numbers of customers leaving will disuade any ISP from doing something stupid (like throttling Google traffic unless you pay more).
&lt;p&gt;

From where I sit, we&#039;ve already surpassed that level of broadband adoption, so there&#039;s not much to worry about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>The article goes on to argue that the real issue is the lack of competition in the broadband market.</blockquote>

<p>

One point a lot of people seem to miss is that &#8220;sufficient competition&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean that everyone must have access to at least two telcos, in case one does something bad.  All you need is enough options for enough people so that the threat of large numbers of customers leaving will disuade any ISP from doing something stupid (like throttling Google traffic unless you pay more).
</p><p>

From where I sit, we&#8217;ve already surpassed that level of broadband adoption, so there&#8217;s not much to worry about.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphy</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-50684</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-50684</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did you guys see Andrew Kantor&#039;s column in today&#039;s USA Today? Interesting that Kantor is recanting. It&#039;s good to see that this on-going dialogue is making an impact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Not too long ago, I was very much on their side. &#039;Imagine you make a phone call to a friend,&#039; I wrote then, &#039;but instead of hearing it ring, you get a recording: We&#039;re sorry, but the person you are calling has not paid Verizon to carry his or her conversations.&#039;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I was wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did what&#039;s easy to do: I blew things out of proportion and borrowed trouble. As I learn more, I realize that Net neutrality Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â at least the way it&#039;s being touted today Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â is a bad idea.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewka...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you guys see Andrew Kantor&#8217;s column in today&#8217;s USA Today? Interesting that Kantor is recanting. It&#8217;s good to see that this on-going dialogue is making an impact.<br /><br />&#8220;Not too long ago, I was very much on their side. &#8216;Imagine you make a phone call to a friend,&#8217; I wrote then, &#8216;but instead of hearing it ring, you get a recording: We&#8217;re sorry, but the person you are calling has not paid Verizon to carry his or her conversations.&#8217;<br /><br /><br /><br />But I was wrong.<br /><br /><br /><br />I did what&#8217;s easy to do: I blew things out of proportion and borrowed trouble. As I learn more, I realize that Net neutrality Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â at least the way it&#8217;s being touted today Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â is a bad idea.&#8221;<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm">http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewka&#8230;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphy</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-50683</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-50683</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did you guys Andrew Kantor&#039;s column in today&#039;s USA Today? Interesting that Kantor is recanting. It&#039;s good to see that this on-going dialogue is making an impact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Not too long ago, I was very much on their side. &#039;Imagine you make a phone call to a friend,&#039; I wrote then, &#039;but instead of hearing it ring, you get a recording: We&#039;re sorry, but the person you are calling has not paid Verizon to carry his or her conversations.&#039;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I was wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did what&#039;s easy to do: I blew things out of proportion and borrowed trouble. As I learn more, I realize that Net neutrality Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â at least the way it&#039;s being touted today Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â is a bad idea.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewka...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you guys Andrew Kantor&#8217;s column in today&#8217;s USA Today? Interesting that Kantor is recanting. It&#8217;s good to see that this on-going dialogue is making an impact.<br /><br />&#8220;Not too long ago, I was very much on their side. &#8216;Imagine you make a phone call to a friend,&#8217; I wrote then, &#8216;but instead of hearing it ring, you get a recording: We&#8217;re sorry, but the person you are calling has not paid Verizon to carry his or her conversations.&#8217;<br /><br /><br /><br />But I was wrong.<br /><br /><br /><br />I did what&#8217;s easy to do: I blew things out of proportion and borrowed trouble. As I learn more, I realize that Net neutrality Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â at least the way it&#8217;s being touted today Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â is a bad idea.&#8221;<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm">http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewka&#8230;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphy</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-33790</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-33790</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did you guys see Andrew Kantor&#039;s column in today&#039;s USA Today? Interesting that Kantor is recanting. It&#039;s good to see that this on-going dialogue is making an impact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Not too long ago, I was very much on their side. &#039;Imagine you make a phone call to a friend,&#039; I wrote then, &#039;but instead of hearing it ring, you get a recording: We&#039;re sorry, but the person you are calling has not paid Verizon to carry his or her conversations.&#039;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I was wrong.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I did what&#039;s easy to do: I blew things out of proportion and borrowed trouble. As I learn more, I realize that Net neutrality Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â at least the way it&#039;s being touted today Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â is a bad idea.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you guys see Andrew Kantor&#8217;s column in today&#8217;s USA Today? Interesting that Kantor is recanting. It&#8217;s good to see that this on-going dialogue is making an impact.</p>

<p>&#8220;Not too long ago, I was very much on their side. &#8216;Imagine you make a phone call to a friend,&#8217; I wrote then, &#8216;but instead of hearing it ring, you get a recording: We&#8217;re sorry, but the person you are calling has not paid Verizon to carry his or her conversations.&#8217;</p>

<p>But I was wrong.</p>

<p>I did what&#8217;s easy to do: I blew things out of proportion and borrowed trouble. As I learn more, I realize that Net neutrality Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â at least the way it&#8217;s being touted today Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â is a bad idea.&#8221;</p>

<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphy</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-33789</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-33789</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did you guys Andrew Kantor&#039;s column in today&#039;s USA Today? Interesting that Kantor is recanting. It&#039;s good to see that this on-going dialogue is making an impact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Not too long ago, I was very much on their side. &#039;Imagine you make a phone call to a friend,&#039; I wrote then, &#039;but instead of hearing it ring, you get a recording: We&#039;re sorry, but the person you are calling has not paid Verizon to carry his or her conversations.&#039;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I was wrong.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I did what&#039;s easy to do: I blew things out of proportion and borrowed trouble. As I learn more, I realize that Net neutrality Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â at least the way it&#039;s being touted today Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â is a bad idea.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you guys Andrew Kantor&#8217;s column in today&#8217;s USA Today? Interesting that Kantor is recanting. It&#8217;s good to see that this on-going dialogue is making an impact.</p>

<p>&#8220;Not too long ago, I was very much on their side. &#8216;Imagine you make a phone call to a friend,&#8217; I wrote then, &#8216;but instead of hearing it ring, you get a recording: We&#8217;re sorry, but the person you are calling has not paid Verizon to carry his or her conversations.&#8217;</p>

<p>But I was wrong.</p>

<p>I did what&#8217;s easy to do: I blew things out of proportion and borrowed trouble. As I learn more, I realize that Net neutrality Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â at least the way it&#8217;s being touted today Ã?Â¢Ã¢?Â¬Ã¢?Â is a bad idea.&#8221;</p>

<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2006-06-15-net-neutrality-revisited_x.htm</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gattuso</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-50682</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gattuso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-50682</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent point.  And the cell phone market, by contrast, is largely unregulated -- network owners are largely free to do what they want.  The landline-v-cellphone comparison seems to undercut the argument for neutrality regulation, not support it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point.  And the cell phone market, by contrast, is largely unregulated &#8212; network owners are largely free to do what they want.  The landline-v-cellphone comparison seems to undercut the argument for neutrality regulation, not support it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gattuso</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/comment-page-1/#comment-33788</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gattuso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/15/freezing-the-net/#comment-33788</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent point.  And the cell phone market, by contrast, is largely unregulated -- network owners are largely free to do what they want.  The landline-v-cellphone comparison seems to undercut the argument for neutrality regulation, not support it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point.  And the cell phone market, by contrast, is largely unregulated &#8212; network owners are largely free to do what they want.  The landline-v-cellphone comparison seems to undercut the argument for neutrality regulation, not support it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

