
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Deconsolidation, Part 13: Tribune Considering Major Downsizing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/06/08/media-deconsolidation-part-13-tribune-considering-major-downsizing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/08/media-deconsolidation-part-13-tribune-considering-major-downsizing/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/08/media-deconsolidation-part-13-tribune-considering-major-downsizing/comment-page-1/#comment-48608</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 02:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/08/media-deconsolidation-part-13-tribune-considering-major-downsizing/#comment-48608</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Spelling: ex&lt;b&gt;c&lt;/b&gt;use.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clearly what you call media deconsolidation is actually a sign of increasing media consolidation.  The broadcast group will be bought by a potential broadcast monopolist (anyone).  Yes, the sky is still falling!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spelling: ex<b>c</b>use.<br /><br />Clearly what you call media deconsolidation is actually a sign of increasing media consolidation.  The broadcast group will be bought by a potential broadcast monopolist (anyone).  Yes, the sky is still falling!<br /><br /> <img src='http://techliberation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/06/08/media-deconsolidation-part-13-tribune-considering-major-downsizing/comment-page-1/#comment-33745</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 01:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/06/08/media-deconsolidation-part-13-tribune-considering-major-downsizing/#comment-33745</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Spelling: ex&lt;b&gt;c&lt;/b&gt;use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Clearly what you call media deconsolidation is actually a sign of increasing media consolidation.  The broadcast group will be bought by a potential broadcast monopolist (anyone).  Yes, the sky is still falling!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spelling: ex<b>c</b>use.</p>

<p>Clearly what you call media deconsolidation is actually a sign of increasing media consolidation.  The broadcast group will be bought by a potential broadcast monopolist (anyone).  Yes, the sky is still falling!</p>

<p> <img src='http://techliberation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

