<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astro-Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/</link>
	<description>The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: propecia generic</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33645</link>
		<dc:creator>propecia generic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33645</guid>
		<description>propecia generic &lt;a&gt;propecia generic&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>propecia generic <a>propecia generic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xfvychb qplzhteoc</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33644</link>
		<dc:creator>xfvychb qplzhteoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 09:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33644</guid>
		<description>ctwaimvfp xjhkwqb vmctzerk mnqsfyr jdkeo bnsyvmofx kxdefbg
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ctwaimvfp xjhkwqb vmctzerk mnqsfyr jdkeo bnsyvmofx kxdefbg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramadol</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33643</link>
		<dc:creator>tramadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33643</guid>
		<description>81e31de21f46 Good work     http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Good work     <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav</a> tramadol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: female nudity</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33642</link>
		<dc:creator>female nudity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 08:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33642</guid>
		<description>bf9dde54dc09 My homepage    &lt;a href="http://www.alphacentavr.info/" rel="nofollow"&gt;female nudity&lt;/a&gt; female nudity

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bf9dde54dc09 My homepage    <a href="http://www.alphacentavr.info/" rel="nofollow">female nudity</a> female nudity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33641</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33641</guid>
		<description>Tim:

Well, it was deleted after you responded to it, which I thought a bit odd....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim:</p>
<p>Well, it was deleted after you responded to it, which I thought a bit odd&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Moore</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33640</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 19:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33640</guid>
		<description>My question is, how do I get that job?  And more importantly, can I get one for writing highly generic, un-supportive comments?

I guess that market might be a tad saturated.

That brings up an interesting point -- what's the difference betwen generic, pro-Original Poster comments, and generic anti-OP comments?  I know that I, like you, would be extremely suspicious of the first, but would consider the latter to be honest but tiresome.

Okay, I've gone way too far down the road of blogging about blogging.  Sorry. :(
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is, how do I get that job?  And more importantly, can I get one for writing highly generic, un-supportive comments?</p>
<p>I guess that market might be a tad saturated.</p>
<p>That brings up an interesting point &#8212; what&#8217;s the difference betwen generic, pro-Original Poster comments, and generic anti-OP comments?  I know that I, like you, would be extremely suspicious of the first, but would consider the latter to be honest but tiresome.</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve gone way too far down the road of blogging about blogging.  Sorry. <img src='http://techliberation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33639</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 19:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33639</guid>
		<description>enigma: if I did it was an accident. We get about 50 spam comments a day, and so I have to do it pretty quickly in order to get it done in a reasoanble time. I might have gotten too trigger-happy. My apologies. I'll be on the lookout for your posts going forward.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>enigma: if I did it was an accident. We get about 50 spam comments a day, and so I have to do it pretty quickly in order to get it done in a reasoanble time. I might have gotten too trigger-happy. My apologies. I&#8217;ll be on the lookout for your posts going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enigma_foundry</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33638</link>
		<dc:creator>enigma_foundry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 17:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33638</guid>
		<description>Tim:

I can understan you're rationale for not deleting such 'Astro-Spam' posts, but what I would like to know is why you'd deleted my several posts, for example in the "Brooklyn Bridge for Sale" article.

Perhaps it wasn't you, but someone else...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim:</p>
<p>I can understan you&#8217;re rationale for not deleting such &#8216;Astro-Spam&#8217; posts, but what I would like to know is why you&#8217;d deleted my several posts, for example in the &#8220;Brooklyn Bridge for Sale&#8221; article.</p>
<p>Perhaps it wasn&#8217;t you, but someone else&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33637</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 16:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33637</guid>
		<description>Tim, as &lt;a href="http://blindmindseye.com/2006/05/31/pajamasmedias-fact-checking-leaves-a-little-something-to-be-desired/" rel="nofollow"&gt;I have noted&lt;/a&gt;, most bloggers don't seem to understand what this issue is about at all. The ones that do, usually frame it in a way that is conducive toward them getting others to pay for them being able to use file sharing software as much as they want. It would be a good lead, though. The telecoms are rightfully getting desperate because they're about to potentially lose control over their own networks to a bunch of populist jacobins.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, as <a href="http://blindmindseye.com/2006/05/31/pajamasmedias-fact-checking-leaves-a-little-something-to-be-desired/" rel="nofollow">I have noted</a>, most bloggers don&#8217;t seem to understand what this issue is about at all. The ones that do, usually frame it in a way that is conducive toward them getting others to pay for them being able to use file sharing software as much as they want. It would be a good lead, though. The telecoms are rightfully getting desperate because they&#8217;re about to potentially lose control over their own networks to a bunch of populist jacobins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
