Comments on: Astro-Spam http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Fri, 25 May 2012 18:27:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: propecia generic http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-33645 propecia generic Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:14:51 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33645 <p>propecia generic <a>propecia generic</a></p> propecia generic propecia generic

]]> By: propecia generic http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46404 propecia generic Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:14:51 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-46404 <p>propecia generic <a>propecia generic</a></p> propecia generic propecia generic

]]> By: xfvychb qplzhteoc http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-33644 xfvychb qplzhteoc Sat, 03 Feb 2007 09:54:22 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33644 <p>ctwaimvfp xjhkwqb vmctzerk mnqsfyr jdkeo bnsyvmofx kxdefbg</p> ctwaimvfp xjhkwqb vmctzerk mnqsfyr jdkeo bnsyvmofx kxdefbg

]]> By: xfvychb qplzhteoc http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46403 xfvychb qplzhteoc Sat, 03 Feb 2007 09:54:22 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-46403 <p>ctwaimvfp xjhkwqb vmctzerk mnqsfyr jdkeo bnsyvmofx kxdefbg</p> ctwaimvfp xjhkwqb vmctzerk mnqsfyr jdkeo bnsyvmofx kxdefbg

]]> By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-33643 tramadol Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:24:09 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33643 <p>81e31de21f46 Good work http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol</p> 81e31de21f46 Good work http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol

]]> By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46402 tramadol Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:24:09 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-46402 <p>81e31de21f46 Good work <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav">http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav</a> tramadol</p> 81e31de21f46 Good work http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol

]]> By: female nudity http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-33642 female nudity Mon, 25 Dec 2006 08:04:06 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33642 <p>bf9dde54dc09 My homepage <a href="http://www.alphacentavr.info/" rel="nofollow">female nudity</a> female nudity</p> bf9dde54dc09 My homepage female nudity female nudity

]]> By: female nudity http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46401 female nudity Mon, 25 Dec 2006 08:04:06 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-46401 <p>bf9dde54dc09 My homepage <a href="http://www.alphacentavr.info/" rel="nofollow">female nudity</a> female nudity</p> bf9dde54dc09 My homepage female nudity female nudity

]]> By: Anonymous http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46400 Anonymous Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:25:44 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-46400 <p>Tim:<br><br>Well, it was deleted after you responded to it, which I thought a bit odd....</p> Tim:

Well, it was deleted after you responded to it, which I thought a bit odd….

]]> By: Anonymous http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-33641 Anonymous Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:25:44 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33641 <p>Tim:</p> <p>Well, it was deleted after you responded to it, which I thought a bit odd....</p> Tim:

Well, it was deleted after you responded to it, which I thought a bit odd….

]]> By: Brian Moore http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46399 Brian Moore Wed, 31 May 2006 20:36:43 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-46399 <p>My question is, how do I get that job? And more importantly, can I get one for writing highly generic, un-supportive comments?<br><br>I guess that market might be a tad saturated.<br><br>That brings up an interesting point -- what's the difference betwen generic, pro-Original Poster comments, and generic anti-OP comments? I know that I, like you, would be extremely suspicious of the first, but would consider the latter to be honest but tiresome.<br><br>Okay, I've gone way too far down the road of blogging about blogging. Sorry. :(</p> My question is, how do I get that job? And more importantly, can I get one for writing highly generic, un-supportive comments?

I guess that market might be a tad saturated.

That brings up an interesting point — what’s the difference betwen generic, pro-Original Poster comments, and generic anti-OP comments? I know that I, like you, would be extremely suspicious of the first, but would consider the latter to be honest but tiresome.

Okay, I’ve gone way too far down the road of blogging about blogging. Sorry. :(

]]> By: Tim http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46398 Tim Wed, 31 May 2006 20:05:22 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-46398 <p>enigma: if I did it was an accident. We get about 50 spam comments a day, and so I have to do it pretty quickly in order to get it done in a reasoanble time. I might have gotten too trigger-happy. My apologies. I'll be on the lookout for your posts going forward.</p> enigma: if I did it was an accident. We get about 50 spam comments a day, and so I have to do it pretty quickly in order to get it done in a reasoanble time. I might have gotten too trigger-happy. My apologies. I’ll be on the lookout for your posts going forward.

]]> By: Brian Moore http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-33640 Brian Moore Wed, 31 May 2006 19:36:43 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33640 <p>My question is, how do I get that job? And more importantly, can I get one for writing highly generic, un-supportive comments?</p> <p>I guess that market might be a tad saturated.</p> <p>That brings up an interesting point -- what's the difference betwen generic, pro-Original Poster comments, and generic anti-OP comments? I know that I, like you, would be extremely suspicious of the first, but would consider the latter to be honest but tiresome.</p> <p>Okay, I've gone way too far down the road of blogging about blogging. Sorry. :(</p> My question is, how do I get that job? And more importantly, can I get one for writing highly generic, un-supportive comments?

I guess that market might be a tad saturated.

That brings up an interesting point — what’s the difference betwen generic, pro-Original Poster comments, and generic anti-OP comments? I know that I, like you, would be extremely suspicious of the first, but would consider the latter to be honest but tiresome.

Okay, I’ve gone way too far down the road of blogging about blogging. Sorry. :(

]]> By: Tim http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-33639 Tim Wed, 31 May 2006 19:05:22 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33639 <p>enigma: if I did it was an accident. We get about 50 spam comments a day, and so I have to do it pretty quickly in order to get it done in a reasoanble time. I might have gotten too trigger-happy. My apologies. I'll be on the lookout for your posts going forward.</p> enigma: if I did it was an accident. We get about 50 spam comments a day, and so I have to do it pretty quickly in order to get it done in a reasoanble time. I might have gotten too trigger-happy. My apologies. I’ll be on the lookout for your posts going forward.

]]> By: eee_eff http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46397 eee_eff Wed, 31 May 2006 18:54:25 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-46397 <p>Tim:<br><br>I can understan you're rationale for not deleting such 'Astro-Spam' posts, but what I would like to know is why you'd deleted my several posts, for example in the "Brooklyn Bridge for Sale" article.<br><br>Perhaps it wasn't you, but someone else...</p> Tim:

I can understan you’re rationale for not deleting such ‘Astro-Spam’ posts, but what I would like to know is why you’d deleted my several posts, for example in the “Brooklyn Bridge for Sale” article.

Perhaps it wasn’t you, but someone else…

]]> By: enigma_foundry http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-33638 enigma_foundry Wed, 31 May 2006 17:54:25 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33638 <p>Tim:</p> <p>I can understan you're rationale for not deleting such 'Astro-Spam' posts, but what I would like to know is why you'd deleted my several posts, for example in the "Brooklyn Bridge for Sale" article.</p> <p>Perhaps it wasn't you, but someone else...</p> Tim:

I can understan you’re rationale for not deleting such ‘Astro-Spam’ posts, but what I would like to know is why you’d deleted my several posts, for example in the “Brooklyn Bridge for Sale” article.

Perhaps it wasn’t you, but someone else…

]]> By: MikeT http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-46396 MikeT Wed, 31 May 2006 17:50:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-46396 <p>Tim, as <a href="http://blindmindseye.com/2006/05/31/pajamasmedias-fact-checking-leaves-a-little-something-to-be-desired/" rel="nofollow">I have noted</a>, most bloggers don't seem to understand what this issue is about at all. The ones that do, usually frame it in a way that is conducive toward them getting others to pay for them being able to use file sharing software as much as they want. It would be a good lead, though. The telecoms are rightfully getting desperate because they're about to potentially lose control over their own networks to a bunch of populist jacobins.</p> Tim, as I have noted, most bloggers don’t seem to understand what this issue is about at all. The ones that do, usually frame it in a way that is conducive toward them getting others to pay for them being able to use file sharing software as much as they want. It would be a good lead, though. The telecoms are rightfully getting desperate because they’re about to potentially lose control over their own networks to a bunch of populist jacobins.

]]> By: MikeT http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-33637 MikeT Wed, 31 May 2006 16:50:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/05/31/astro-spam/#comment-33637 <p>Tim, as <a href="http://blindmindseye.com/2006/05/31/pajamasmedias-fact-checking-leaves-a-little-something-to-be-desired/" rel="nofollow">I have noted</a>, most bloggers don't seem to understand what this issue is about at all. The ones that do, usually frame it in a way that is conducive toward them getting others to pay for them being able to use file sharing software as much as they want. It would be a good lead, though. The telecoms are rightfully getting desperate because they're about to potentially lose control over their own networks to a bunch of populist jacobins.</p> Tim, as I have noted, most bloggers don’t seem to understand what this issue is about at all. The ones that do, usually frame it in a way that is conducive toward them getting others to pay for them being able to use file sharing software as much as they want. It would be a good lead, though. The telecoms are rightfully getting desperate because they’re about to potentially lose control over their own networks to a bunch of populist jacobins.

]]>