
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechLawJournal Parses Phone Company Denials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-52355</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 19:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/#comment-52355</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What about other phone companies?  Like Qwest? or my local re-supplier? or long distance phone companies, like Power Net Global?  Or, right now, are just Verizon, BellSouth and AT&amp;T; involved?  I&#039;d sure like to know that answer.  And if a re-supplier is using Qwest lines, can Qwest access my call records and turn them over without the local re-supplier even knowing about it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about other phone companies?  Like Qwest? or my local re-supplier? or long distance phone companies, like Power Net Global?  Or, right now, are just Verizon, BellSouth and AT&#038;T; involved?  I&#8217;d sure like to know that answer.  And if a re-supplier is using Qwest lines, can Qwest access my call records and turn them over without the local re-supplier even knowing about it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-33516</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 18:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/#comment-33516</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What about other phone companies?  Like Qwest? or my local re-supplier? or long distance phone companies, like Power Net Global?  Or, right now, are just Verizon, BellSouth and AT&amp;T involved?  I&#039;d sure like to know that answer.  And if a re-supplier is using Qwest lines, can Qwest access my call records and turn them over without the local re-supplier even knowing about it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about other phone companies?  Like Qwest? or my local re-supplier? or long distance phone companies, like Power Net Global?  Or, right now, are just Verizon, BellSouth and AT&amp;T involved?  I&#8217;d sure like to know that answer.  And if a re-supplier is using Qwest lines, can Qwest access my call records and turn them over without the local re-supplier even knowing about it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harper</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-52354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 12:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/#comment-52354</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Remotely possible.  But unlikely.  Given that they trust themselves to do the right thing, why would they take this precaution against abuse?  It would only hinder their ability should they want to investigate a number.  But much is unknown . . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remotely possible.  But unlikely.  Given that they trust themselves to do the right thing, why would they take this precaution against abuse?  It would only hinder their ability should they want to investigate a number.  But much is unknown . . .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harper</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-33515</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 11:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/#comment-33515</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Remotely possible.  But unlikely.  Given that they trust themselves to do the right thing, why would they take this precaution against abuse?  It would only hinder their ability should they want to investigate a number.  But much is unknown . . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remotely possible.  But unlikely.  Given that they trust themselves to do the right thing, why would they take this precaution against abuse?  It would only hinder their ability should they want to investigate a number.  But much is unknown . . .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-52353</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 20:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/#comment-52353</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is it possible that the companies didn&#039;t provide the actual phone numbers, but gave calling information with the actual phone numbers replaced with non-identifying (but consistent) values?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That way, the NSA could research calling patterns, but not determine who the individuals are without following further legal processes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that the companies didn&#8217;t provide the actual phone numbers, but gave calling information with the actual phone numbers replaced with non-identifying (but consistent) values?<br /><br />That way, the NSA could research calling patterns, but not determine who the individuals are without following further legal processes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/comment-page-1/#comment-33514</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 19:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/18/techlawjournal-parses-phone-company-denials/#comment-33514</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is it possible that the companies didn&#039;t provide the actual phone numbers, but gave calling information with the actual phone numbers replaced with non-identifying (but consistent) values?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That way, the NSA could research calling patterns, but not determine who the individuals are without following further legal processes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible that the companies didn&#8217;t provide the actual phone numbers, but gave calling information with the actual phone numbers replaced with non-identifying (but consistent) values?</p>

<p>That way, the NSA could research calling patterns, but not determine who the individuals are without following further legal processes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

