
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NSA Spying.  Who&#8217;s to Blame?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commons Music</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-52594</link>
		<dc:creator>Commons Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 22:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/#comment-52594</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;...unless, of course, the government &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_04.php#004613&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;shuts down the lawsuit&lt;/a&gt;.  Funny how that works, huh?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My favorite part of the government&#039;s letter in response is where it says that saying this should be a secret is not an admission that there is anything to be secretive about.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Classic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;unless, of course, the government <a href="http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_04.php#004613" rel="nofollow">shuts down the lawsuit</a>.  Funny how that works, huh?<br /><br /><br /><br />My favorite part of the government&#8217;s letter in response is where it says that saying this should be a secret is not an admission that there is anything to be secretive about.<br /><br /><br /><br />Classic.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commons Music</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-33442</link>
		<dc:creator>Commons Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 21:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/#comment-33442</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;...unless, of course, the government &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_04.php#004613&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;shuts down the lawsuit&lt;/a&gt;.  Funny how that works, huh?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My favorite part of the government&#039;s letter in response is where it says that saying this should be a secret is not an admission that there is anything to be secretive about.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Classic.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;unless, of course, the government <a href="http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_04.php#004613" rel="nofollow">shuts down the lawsuit</a>.  Funny how that works, huh?<br /><br /></p>

<p>My favorite part of the government&#8217;s letter in response is where it says that saying this should be a secret is not an admission that there is anything to be secretive about.<br /><br /></p>

<p>Classic.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-52593</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 21:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/#comment-52593</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t this a case where actions like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EFF&#039;s lawsuit against AT&amp;T;&lt;/a&gt; are a legitimate reaction by consumers to deception by a private company? One of the big advantage of entrusting our private data to private companies is that private companies don&#039;t have sovereign immunity. So we can use the court system to (at a minimum) expose and (possibly) deter private companies from being too lax about protecting our privacy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this a case where actions like <a href="http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/" rel="nofollow">EFF&#8217;s lawsuit against AT&#038;T;</a> are a legitimate reaction by consumers to deception by a private company? One of the big advantage of entrusting our private data to private companies is that private companies don&#8217;t have sovereign immunity. So we can use the court system to (at a minimum) expose and (possibly) deter private companies from being too lax about protecting our privacy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/comment-page-1/#comment-33441</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 20:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/05/12/nsa-spying-whos-to-blame/#comment-33441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t this a case where actions like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EFF&#039;s lawsuit against AT&amp;T&lt;/a&gt; are a legitimate reaction by consumers to deception by a private company? One of the big advantage of entrusting our private data to private companies is that private companies don&#039;t have sovereign immunity. So we can use the court system to (at a minimum) expose and (possibly) deter private companies from being too lax about protecting our privacy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this a case where actions like <a href="http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/" rel="nofollow">EFF&#8217;s lawsuit against AT&amp;T</a> are a legitimate reaction by consumers to deception by a private company? One of the big advantage of entrusting our private data to private companies is that private companies don&#8217;t have sovereign immunity. So we can use the court system to (at a minimum) expose and (possibly) deter private companies from being too lax about protecting our privacy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

