
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaking of Cynical&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramadol</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-33212</link>
		<dc:creator>tramadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-33212</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Great work     http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Great work     <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav</a> tramadol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramadol</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-55303</link>
		<dc:creator>tramadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-55303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Great work     &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav&quot;&gt;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav&lt;/a&gt; tramadol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Great work     <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav">http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav</a> tramadol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: short url</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-33211</link>
		<dc:creator>short url</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-33211</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;8c5239e0aeb4 My homepage     http:/0zu.tw/ short url&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8c5239e0aeb4 My homepage     http:/0zu.tw/ short url</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: short url</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-55302</link>
		<dc:creator>short url</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-55302</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;8c5239e0aeb4 My homepage     http:/0zu.tw/ short url&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8c5239e0aeb4 My homepage     http:/0zu.tw/ short url</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-55301</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-55301</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why does that not surprise me? Things like these seem like &quot;common sense&quot; when you are caught up in law and policy, but when you are actually a developer, they are a matter of your profession being raped. The more that things like this come to pass, the more that I think the entire patent system should be outright abolished in favor of temporary monopolies for certain industries.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does that not surprise me? Things like these seem like &#8220;common sense&#8221; when you are caught up in law and policy, but when you are actually a developer, they are a matter of your profession being raped. The more that things like this come to pass, the more that I think the entire patent system should be outright abolished in favor of temporary monopolies for certain industries.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-33210</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-33210</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why does that not surprise me? Things like these seem like &quot;common sense&quot; when you are caught up in law and policy, but when you are actually a developer, they are a matter of your profession being raped. The more that things like this come to pass, the more that I think the entire patent system should be outright abolished in favor of temporary monopolies for certain industries.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does that not surprise me? Things like these seem like &#8220;common sense&#8221; when you are caught up in law and policy, but when you are actually a developer, they are a matter of your profession being raped. The more that things like this come to pass, the more that I think the entire patent system should be outright abolished in favor of temporary monopolies for certain industries.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harper</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-55300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-55300</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My recollection is that Jim DeLong promoted Intellectual Ventures as a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My recollection is that Jim DeLong promoted Intellectual Ventures as a good thing.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harper</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-33209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-33209</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My recollection is that Jim DeLong promoted Intellectual Ventures as a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My recollection is that Jim DeLong promoted Intellectual Ventures as a good thing.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-55299</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-55299</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tim,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They don&#039;t seem to like to actually engage others who disagree with them. Either their trackback system is broken, or they blocked my blog, but they won&#039;t let me ping their entries with rebuttals to their posts. I guess it just goes to show that they are like a lot of &quot;policy people.&quot; They want to be able to put their ideas out there without having to defend them in a civil and logical manner. Look at Epstein&#039;s last paper and its wildly inaccurate take on what constitutes open source software. They&#039;re not interested in being corrected, they just want to be right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You would think that they&#039;d be frothing at the mouth over &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipww.com/display.php/file=/texts/0506/venture&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Intellectual Ventures&lt;/a&gt;, a patent cartel specifically created to sue the hell out of research and development upstarts trying to build up products. All of the big guys have funded them. Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, etc. Where is Ross on this? How about DeLong? This represents a fundamental abuse of the patent system because it&#039;s a company designed for the sole purpose of using patents to drain money out of the economy since IV has no R&amp;D; employees at all. They literally &lt;strong&gt;produce nothing&lt;/strong&gt; except lawsuits.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, again, as they are quick to remind us about all IP. Without the strictest laws humanly possible, it&#039;d all fall apart. No one would produce anything of value. Nothing would be written, drawn, filmed, recorded, research, built, nothing. The only reason that people are interested in art and science is money and would never work at it unless they could make outrageous sums of money. *Looks at average research scientist and artist*. Oh wait, they get paid crap on average compared to your average IP attorney.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You know what would make it a lot easier for IPCentral to be taken seriously by anyone outside of the IP extremist camp? If they would open up comments like TLF and actually engage their critics. A blog with closed trackbacks and comments is nothing more than a very biased news media website.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>They don&#8217;t seem to like to actually engage others who disagree with them. Either their trackback system is broken, or they blocked my blog, but they won&#8217;t let me ping their entries with rebuttals to their posts. I guess it just goes to show that they are like a lot of &#8220;policy people.&#8221; They want to be able to put their ideas out there without having to defend them in a civil and logical manner. Look at Epstein&#8217;s last paper and its wildly inaccurate take on what constitutes open source software. They&#8217;re not interested in being corrected, they just want to be right.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>You would think that they&#8217;d be frothing at the mouth over <a href="http://www.ipww.com/display.php/file=/texts/0506/venture" rel="nofollow">Intellectual Ventures</a>, a patent cartel specifically created to sue the hell out of research and development upstarts trying to build up products. All of the big guys have funded them. Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, etc. Where is Ross on this? How about DeLong? This represents a fundamental abuse of the patent system because it&#8217;s a company designed for the sole purpose of using patents to drain money out of the economy since IV has no R&#038;D; employees at all. They literally <strong>produce nothing</strong> except lawsuits.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>But, again, as they are quick to remind us about all IP. Without the strictest laws humanly possible, it&#8217;d all fall apart. No one would produce anything of value. Nothing would be written, drawn, filmed, recorded, research, built, nothing. The only reason that people are interested in art and science is money and would never work at it unless they could make outrageous sums of money. *Looks at average research scientist and artist*. Oh wait, they get paid crap on average compared to your average IP attorney.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>You know what would make it a lot easier for IPCentral to be taken seriously by anyone outside of the IP extremist camp? If they would open up comments like TLF and actually engage their critics. A blog with closed trackbacks and comments is nothing more than a very biased news media website.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lay</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-55298</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-55298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Speaking of Partick Ross, did Rep. Lamar Smith REALLY say yesterday that the DMCA is &quot;the foundation of our digital economy,&quot; as Mr. Ross reports on the IPCentral blog? I knoew Rep. Smith was misguided, but can he really be THAT far gone?  This comment calls for significant ridicule, if Rep. Smith really made it.  I hesitate to rely on the word of Patrick Ross though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Partick Ross, did Rep. Lamar Smith REALLY say yesterday that the DMCA is &#8220;the foundation of our digital economy,&#8221; as Mr. Ross reports on the IPCentral blog? I knoew Rep. Smith was misguided, but can he really be THAT far gone?  This comment calls for significant ridicule, if Rep. Smith really made it.  I hesitate to rely on the word of Patrick Ross though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-33208</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-33208</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tim,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They don&#039;t seem to like to actually engage others who disagree with them. Either their trackback system is broken, or they blocked my blog, but they won&#039;t let me ping their entries with rebuttals to their posts. I guess it just goes to show that they are like a lot of &quot;policy people.&quot; They want to be able to put their ideas out there without having to defend them in a civil and logical manner. Look at Epstein&#039;s last paper and its wildly inaccurate take on what constitutes open source software. They&#039;re not interested in being corrected, they just want to be right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You would think that they&#039;d be frothing at the mouth over &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipww.com/display.php/file=/texts/0506/venture&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Intellectual Ventures&lt;/a&gt;, a patent cartel specifically created to sue the hell out of research and development upstarts trying to build up products. All of the big guys have funded them. Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, etc. Where is Ross on this? How about DeLong? This represents a fundamental abuse of the patent system because it&#039;s a company designed for the sole purpose of using patents to drain money out of the economy since IV has no R&amp;D employees at all. They literally &lt;strong&gt;produce nothing&lt;/strong&gt; except lawsuits.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, again, as they are quick to remind us about all IP. Without the strictest laws humanly possible, it&#039;d all fall apart. No one would produce anything of value. Nothing would be written, drawn, filmed, recorded, research, built, nothing. The only reason that people are interested in art and science is money and would never work at it unless they could make outrageous sums of money. *Looks at average research scientist and artist*. Oh wait, they get paid crap on average compared to your average IP attorney.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You know what would make it a lot easier for IPCentral to be taken seriously by anyone outside of the IP extremist camp? If they would open up comments like TLF and actually engage their critics. A blog with closed trackbacks and comments is nothing more than a very biased news media website.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>

<p>They don&#8217;t seem to like to actually engage others who disagree with them. Either their trackback system is broken, or they blocked my blog, but they won&#8217;t let me ping their entries with rebuttals to their posts. I guess it just goes to show that they are like a lot of &#8220;policy people.&#8221; They want to be able to put their ideas out there without having to defend them in a civil and logical manner. Look at Epstein&#8217;s last paper and its wildly inaccurate take on what constitutes open source software. They&#8217;re not interested in being corrected, they just want to be right.</p>

<p>You would think that they&#8217;d be frothing at the mouth over <a href="http://www.ipww.com/display.php/file=/texts/0506/venture" rel="nofollow">Intellectual Ventures</a>, a patent cartel specifically created to sue the hell out of research and development upstarts trying to build up products. All of the big guys have funded them. Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, etc. Where is Ross on this? How about DeLong? This represents a fundamental abuse of the patent system because it&#8217;s a company designed for the sole purpose of using patents to drain money out of the economy since IV has no R&#038;D employees at all. They literally <strong>produce nothing</strong> except lawsuits.</p>

<p>But, again, as they are quick to remind us about all IP. Without the strictest laws humanly possible, it&#8217;d all fall apart. No one would produce anything of value. Nothing would be written, drawn, filmed, recorded, research, built, nothing. The only reason that people are interested in art and science is money and would never work at it unless they could make outrageous sums of money. *Looks at average research scientist and artist*. Oh wait, they get paid crap on average compared to your average IP attorney.</p>

<p>You know what would make it a lot easier for IPCentral to be taken seriously by anyone outside of the IP extremist camp? If they would open up comments like TLF and actually engage their critics. A blog with closed trackbacks and comments is nothing more than a very biased news media website.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lay</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/comment-page-1/#comment-33207</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/26/speaking-of-cynical/#comment-33207</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Speaking of Partick Ross, did Rep. Lamar Smith REALLY say yesterday that the DMCA is &quot;the foundation of our digital economy,&quot; as Mr. Ross reports on the IPCentral blog? I knoew Rep. Smith was misguided, but can he really be THAT far gone?  This comment calls for significant ridicule, if Rep. Smith really made it.  I hesitate to rely on the word of Patrick Ross though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Partick Ross, did Rep. Lamar Smith REALLY say yesterday that the DMCA is &#8220;the foundation of our digital economy,&#8221; as Mr. Ross reports on the IPCentral blog? I knoew Rep. Smith was misguided, but can he really be THAT far gone?  This comment calls for significant ridicule, if Rep. Smith really made it.  I hesitate to rely on the word of Patrick Ross though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

