
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Cute Gimmick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: home mortgage uk</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-33127</link>
		<dc:creator>home mortgage uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-33127</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Very good    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/cubwewe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;home mortgage uk&lt;/a&gt; home mortgage uk
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/raiqgoxa&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bad credit loans uk&lt;/a&gt; bad credit loans uk
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/tibfebow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;real estate agent&lt;/a&gt; real estate agent
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/tyvjihec&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;white house&lt;/a&gt; white house
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/gaxarov&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;business card&lt;/a&gt; business card
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/nokgijvy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mortgage loan leads&lt;/a&gt; mortgage loan leads
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/jonpahip&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;home loan lender&lt;/a&gt; home loan lender
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/lyzyyzby&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;payday loans&lt;/a&gt; payday loans
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/jaxufes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;johnny cash hurt&lt;/a&gt; johnny cash hurt
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/gokigyf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mls search&lt;/a&gt; mls search&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Very good    <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/cubwewe" rel="nofollow">home mortgage uk</a> home mortgage uk
<a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/raiqgoxa" rel="nofollow">bad credit loans uk</a> bad credit loans uk
<a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/tibfebow" rel="nofollow">real estate agent</a> real estate agent
<a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/tyvjihec" rel="nofollow">white house</a> white house
<a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/gaxarov" rel="nofollow">business card</a> business card
<a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/nokgijvy" rel="nofollow">mortgage loan leads</a> mortgage loan leads
<a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/jonpahip" rel="nofollow">home loan lender</a> home loan lender
<a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/lyzyyzby" rel="nofollow">payday loans</a> payday loans
<a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/jaxufes" rel="nofollow">johnny cash hurt</a> johnny cash hurt
<a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/gokigyf" rel="nofollow">mls search</a> mls search</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: home mortgage uk</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-53471</link>
		<dc:creator>home mortgage uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-53471</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Very good    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/cubwewe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;home mortgage uk&lt;/a&gt; home mortgage uk&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/raiqgoxa&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bad credit loans uk&lt;/a&gt; bad credit loans uk&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/tibfebow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;real estate agent&lt;/a&gt; real estate agent&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/tyvjihec&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;white house&lt;/a&gt; white house&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/gaxarov&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;business card&lt;/a&gt; business card&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/nokgijvy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mortgage loan leads&lt;/a&gt; mortgage loan leads&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/jonpahip&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;home loan lender&lt;/a&gt; home loan lender&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/lyzyyzby&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;payday loans&lt;/a&gt; payday loans&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/jaxufes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;johnny cash hurt&lt;/a&gt; johnny cash hurt&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/gokigyf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mls search&lt;/a&gt; mls search&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Very good    <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/cubwewe" rel="nofollow">home mortgage uk</a> home mortgage uk<br /><a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/raiqgoxa" rel="nofollow">bad credit loans uk</a> bad credit loans uk<br /><a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/tibfebow" rel="nofollow">real estate agent</a> real estate agent<br /><a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/tyvjihec" rel="nofollow">white house</a> white house<br /><a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/gaxarov" rel="nofollow">business card</a> business card<br /><a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/nokgijvy" rel="nofollow">mortgage loan leads</a> mortgage loan leads<br /><a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/jonpahip" rel="nofollow">home loan lender</a> home loan lender<br /><a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/lyzyyzby" rel="nofollow">payday loans</a> payday loans<br /><a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/jaxufes" rel="nofollow">johnny cash hurt</a> johnny cash hurt<br /><a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/gokigyf" rel="nofollow">mls search</a> mls search</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramadol</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-33126</link>
		<dc:creator>tramadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-33126</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Hi    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tramadol&lt;/a&gt; tramadol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Hi    <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramadol</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-53470</link>
		<dc:creator>tramadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-53470</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Hi    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tramadol&lt;/a&gt; tramadol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Hi    <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramadol</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-33125</link>
		<dc:creator>tramadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-33125</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Great work    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tramadol&lt;/a&gt; tramadol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Great work    <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramadol</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-53469</link>
		<dc:creator>tramadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-53469</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Great work    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tramadol&lt;/a&gt; tramadol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Great work    <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheJollyLlama875</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-53468</link>
		<dc:creator>TheJollyLlama875</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-53468</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Who judges what a significant invention is or isn&#039;t? This scale seems to rely on some abstract method of quantitating the importance of events. Where&#039;s the automobile, the airplane, even the steam engine? Are they considered part of the industrial revolution event?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think this is a pretty logical idea, but it&#039;s silly to put on a graph. I think, though, that the most significant increases in inventions would follow every improvement in communications, because of the subsequent increase in the availability of information. You don&#039;t &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; to have years of schooling to be knowledgable in a field, you can just check it out on Wikipedia or Encarta or whatever. If you want to collaborate on something, you don&#039;t need to wait for a boat to cross the ocean, or some guy on horseback to carry it across the continent.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who judges what a significant invention is or isn&#8217;t? This scale seems to rely on some abstract method of quantitating the importance of events. Where&#8217;s the automobile, the airplane, even the steam engine? Are they considered part of the industrial revolution event?<br /><br />I think this is a pretty logical idea, but it&#8217;s silly to put on a graph. I think, though, that the most significant increases in inventions would follow every improvement in communications, because of the subsequent increase in the availability of information. You don&#8217;t <i>have</i> to have years of schooling to be knowledgable in a field, you can just check it out on Wikipedia or Encarta or whatever. If you want to collaborate on something, you don&#8217;t need to wait for a boat to cross the ocean, or some guy on horseback to carry it across the continent.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheJollyLlama875</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-33124</link>
		<dc:creator>TheJollyLlama875</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-33124</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Who judges what a significant invention is or isn&#039;t? This scale seems to rely on some abstract method of quantitating the importance of events. Where&#039;s the automobile, the airplane, even the steam engine? Are they considered part of the industrial revolution event?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think this is a pretty logical idea, but it&#039;s silly to put on a graph. I think, though, that the most significant increases in inventions would follow every improvement in communications, because of the subsequent increase in the availability of information. You don&#039;t &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; to have years of schooling to be knowledgable in a field, you can just check it out on Wikipedia or Encarta or whatever. If you want to collaborate on something, you don&#039;t need to wait for a boat to cross the ocean, or some guy on horseback to carry it across the continent.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who judges what a significant invention is or isn&#8217;t? This scale seems to rely on some abstract method of quantitating the importance of events. Where&#8217;s the automobile, the airplane, even the steam engine? Are they considered part of the industrial revolution event?</p>

<p>I think this is a pretty logical idea, but it&#8217;s silly to put on a graph. I think, though, that the most significant increases in inventions would follow every improvement in communications, because of the subsequent increase in the availability of information. You don&#8217;t <i>have</i> to have years of schooling to be knowledgable in a field, you can just check it out on Wikipedia or Encarta or whatever. If you want to collaborate on something, you don&#8217;t need to wait for a boat to cross the ocean, or some guy on horseback to carry it across the continent.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Precision Blogger</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-53467</link>
		<dc:creator>Precision Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-53467</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;PLEASE keep bombarding us. The DMCA did something truly remarkable. It established a legal concept in direct opposition to the first amendment, for the sole purpose of protecting the business plan of a few companies. (That is, making it illegal to reverse engineer, or help reverse engineer, DRM.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Preventing people from shouting FIRE in a crowded theater is a good reason to limit the first amendment. Fearing that Disney and Sony will make less money is a bad reason.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The DMCA needs serious fixing. Please TALK about it until it&#039;s fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE keep bombarding us. The DMCA did something truly remarkable. It established a legal concept in direct opposition to the first amendment, for the sole purpose of protecting the business plan of a few companies. (That is, making it illegal to reverse engineer, or help reverse engineer, DRM.)<br /><br />Preventing people from shouting FIRE in a crowded theater is a good reason to limit the first amendment. Fearing that Disney and Sony will make less money is a bad reason.<br /><br />The DMCA needs serious fixing. Please TALK about it until it&#8217;s fixed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Precision Blogger</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-33123</link>
		<dc:creator>Precision Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-33123</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;PLEASE keep bombarding us. The DMCA did something truly remarkable. It established a legal concept in direct opposition to the first amendment, for the sole purpose of protecting the business plan of a few companies. (That is, making it illegal to reverse engineer, or help reverse engineer, DRM.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Preventing people from shouting FIRE in a crowded theater is a good reason to limit the first amendment. Fearing that Disney and Sony will make less money is a bad reason.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The DMCA needs serious fixing. Please TALK about it until it&#039;s fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE keep bombarding us. The DMCA did something truly remarkable. It established a legal concept in direct opposition to the first amendment, for the sole purpose of protecting the business plan of a few companies. (That is, making it illegal to reverse engineer, or help reverse engineer, DRM.)</p>

<p>Preventing people from shouting FIRE in a crowded theater is a good reason to limit the first amendment. Fearing that Disney and Sony will make less money is a bad reason.</p>

<p>The DMCA needs serious fixing. Please TALK about it until it&#8217;s fixed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-53466</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-53466</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;He may very well be right about the long-term trend. I just think that this particular chart (and the argument behind it) is bogus. Obviously, someone in 1006 wouldn&#039;t have come to the conclusion that we were about to have super-intelligent computers, but I think he still might have produced a chart like the one Kurzweil produced, showing that more recent inventions are more closely spaced together, and concluding that the pace of innovation had picked up dramatically and something amazing was going to happen in the 11th century.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kurzweil might be right, but this particular argument isn&#039;t persuasive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may very well be right about the long-term trend. I just think that this particular chart (and the argument behind it) is bogus. Obviously, someone in 1006 wouldn&#8217;t have come to the conclusion that we were about to have super-intelligent computers, but I think he still might have produced a chart like the one Kurzweil produced, showing that more recent inventions are more closely spaced together, and concluding that the pace of innovation had picked up dramatically and something amazing was going to happen in the 11th century.<br /><br />Kurzweil might be right, but this particular argument isn&#8217;t persuasive.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-33122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-33122</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;He may very well be right about the long-term trend. I just think that this particular chart (and the argument behind it) is bogus. Obviously, someone in 1006 wouldn&#039;t have come to the conclusion that we were about to have super-intelligent computers, but I think he still might have produced a chart like the one Kurzweil produced, showing that more recent inventions are more closely spaced together, and concluding that the pace of innovation had picked up dramatically and something amazing was going to happen in the 11th century.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kurzweil might be right, but this particular argument isn&#039;t persuasive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may very well be right about the long-term trend. I just think that this particular chart (and the argument behind it) is bogus. Obviously, someone in 1006 wouldn&#8217;t have come to the conclusion that we were about to have super-intelligent computers, but I think he still might have produced a chart like the one Kurzweil produced, showing that more recent inventions are more closely spaced together, and concluding that the pace of innovation had picked up dramatically and something amazing was going to happen in the 11th century.</p>

<p>Kurzweil might be right, but this particular argument isn&#8217;t persuasive.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-53465</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 05:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-53465</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can imagine that a 1956 or 1856 Kurzweil would have been able to describe seemingly exponential progress and plausibly predict singularity in the near future.  An 1806 Kurzweil would need a fantastic imagination and it would be beyond the realm of a 1066 model&#039;s thought.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2005 Kurzweil may have recent events grouped incorrectly and may have the next epoch wrong by decades or even centuries but in broad strokes I think he&#039;s right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may be interested in Robin Hanson&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://hanson.gmu.edu/longgrow.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Long-Term Growth As A Sequence of Exponential Modes&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can imagine that a 1956 or 1856 Kurzweil would have been able to describe seemingly exponential progress and plausibly predict singularity in the near future.  An 1806 Kurzweil would need a fantastic imagination and it would be beyond the realm of a 1066 model&#8217;s thought.<br /><br />2005 Kurzweil may have recent events grouped incorrectly and may have the next epoch wrong by decades or even centuries but in broad strokes I think he&#8217;s right.<br /><br />You may be interested in Robin Hanson&#8217;s <a href="http://hanson.gmu.edu/longgrow.html" rel="nofollow">Long-Term Growth As A Sequence of Exponential Modes</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/comment-page-1/#comment-33121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/04/15/a-cute-gimmick/#comment-33121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can imagine that a 1956 or 1856 Kurzweil would have been able to describe seemingly exponential progress and plausibly predict singularity in the near future.  An 1806 Kurzweil would need a fantastic imagination and it would be beyond the realm of a 1066 model&#039;s thought.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2005 Kurzweil may have recent events grouped incorrectly and may have the next epoch wrong by decades or even centuries but in broad strokes I think he&#039;s right.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You may be interested in Robin Hanson&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://hanson.gmu.edu/longgrow.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Long-Term Growth As A Sequence of Exponential Modes&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can imagine that a 1956 or 1856 Kurzweil would have been able to describe seemingly exponential progress and plausibly predict singularity in the near future.  An 1806 Kurzweil would need a fantastic imagination and it would be beyond the realm of a 1066 model&#8217;s thought.</p>

<p>2005 Kurzweil may have recent events grouped incorrectly and may have the next epoch wrong by decades or even centuries but in broad strokes I think he&#8217;s right.</p>

<p>You may be interested in Robin Hanson&#8217;s <a href="http://hanson.gmu.edu/longgrow.html" rel="nofollow">Long-Term Growth As A Sequence of Exponential Modes</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

