<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Flash: Larry Ellison is a Megalomaniac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:51:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PLN</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/comment-page-1/#comment-32883</link>
		<dc:creator>PLN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/#comment-32883</guid>
		<description>I strongly suspect it&#039;s more the tautological point than the causal one; success -just means- balance sheet impact.  What&#039;s particularly interesting to me is how many pro-IP sorts are intimately familiar with Bastiat&#039;s broken window fallacy in other contexts, but don&#039;t see it operating here.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly suspect it&#8217;s more the tautological point than the causal one; success -just means- balance sheet impact.  What&#8217;s particularly interesting to me is how many pro-IP sorts are intimately familiar with Bastiat&#8217;s broken window fallacy in other contexts, but don&#8217;t see it operating here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLN</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/comment-page-1/#comment-52066</link>
		<dc:creator>PLN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/#comment-52066</guid>
		<description>I strongly suspect it&#039;s more the tautological point than the causal one; success -just means- balance sheet impact.  What&#039;s particularly interesting to me is how many pro-IP sorts are intimately familiar with Bastiat&#039;s broken window fallacy in other contexts, but don&#039;t see it operating here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly suspect it&#8217;s more the tautological point than the causal one; success -just means- balance sheet impact.  What&#8217;s particularly interesting to me is how many pro-IP sorts are intimately familiar with Bastiat&#8217;s broken window fallacy in other contexts, but don&#8217;t see it operating here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey5</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/comment-page-1/#comment-32882</link>
		<dc:creator>joey5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/#comment-32882</guid>
		<description>Oracle didn&#039;t even do any core filesystem work -- they just decided to port OCFS (Oracle Cluster Filesystem) to Linux and try to get the kernel maintainers to accept it.

That&#039;s not to say that OCFS is no good, or that Oracle didn&#039;t make a valid contribution -- they did.  But it isn&#039;t exactly earth-shattering.  RedHat&#039;s GFS does the same thing.  And Oracle just joins a long line of old-school-unix shops trying to get their hacks into Linux (IBM contributed JFS, SGI contributed XFS, etc) -- none of which form any type of key component for most Linux users, who almost universally just use EXT3 or ReiserFS (the two default filesystems).

Answer me this: is DeLong really siding with Ellison over the Open Source Community?  I would have thought he&#039;d at least choose his companions a little more judiciously.  Oh well, anything that explains away open source must be good and true, so he gets on the boat.  Good job DeLong!  You&#039;re convincing us all now!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle didn&#8217;t even do any core filesystem work &#8212; they just decided to port OCFS (Oracle Cluster Filesystem) to Linux and try to get the kernel maintainers to accept it.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that OCFS is no good, or that Oracle didn&#8217;t make a valid contribution &#8212; they did.  But it isn&#8217;t exactly earth-shattering.  RedHat&#8217;s GFS does the same thing.  And Oracle just joins a long line of old-school-unix shops trying to get their hacks into Linux (IBM contributed JFS, SGI contributed XFS, etc) &#8212; none of which form any type of key component for most Linux users, who almost universally just use EXT3 or ReiserFS (the two default filesystems).</p>
<p>Answer me this: is DeLong really siding with Ellison over the Open Source Community?  I would have thought he&#8217;d at least choose his companions a little more judiciously.  Oh well, anything that explains away open source must be good and true, so he gets on the boat.  Good job DeLong!  You&#8217;re convincing us all now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey5</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/comment-page-1/#comment-52065</link>
		<dc:creator>joey5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/#comment-52065</guid>
		<description>Oracle didn&#039;t even do any core filesystem work -- they just decided to port OCFS (Oracle Cluster Filesystem) to Linux and try to get the kernel maintainers to accept it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s not to say that OCFS is no good, or that Oracle didn&#039;t make a valid contribution -- they did.  But it isn&#039;t exactly earth-shattering.  RedHat&#039;s GFS does the same thing.  And Oracle just joins a long line of old-school-unix shops trying to get their hacks into Linux (IBM contributed JFS, SGI contributed XFS, etc) -- none of which form any type of key component for most Linux users, who almost universally just use EXT3 or ReiserFS (the two default filesystems).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Answer me this: is DeLong really siding with Ellison over the Open Source Community?  I would have thought he&#039;d at least choose his companions a little more judiciously.  Oh well, anything that explains away open source must be good and true, so he gets on the boat.  Good job DeLong!  You&#039;re convincing us all now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle didn&#8217;t even do any core filesystem work &#8212; they just decided to port OCFS (Oracle Cluster Filesystem) to Linux and try to get the kernel maintainers to accept it.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that OCFS is no good, or that Oracle didn&#8217;t make a valid contribution &#8212; they did.  But it isn&#8217;t exactly earth-shattering.  RedHat&#8217;s GFS does the same thing.  And Oracle just joins a long line of old-school-unix shops trying to get their hacks into Linux (IBM contributed JFS, SGI contributed XFS, etc) &#8212; none of which form any type of key component for most Linux users, who almost universally just use EXT3 or ReiserFS (the two default filesystems).</p>
<p>Answer me this: is DeLong really siding with Ellison over the Open Source Community?  I would have thought he&#8217;d at least choose his companions a little more judiciously.  Oh well, anything that explains away open source must be good and true, so he gets on the boat.  Good job DeLong!  You&#8217;re convincing us all now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/comment-page-1/#comment-32881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/#comment-32881</guid>
		<description>The actual developers are busy, you know, writing code.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual developers are busy, you know, writing code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/comment-page-1/#comment-52064</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/#comment-52064</guid>
		<description>The actual developers are busy, you know, writing code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual developers are busy, you know, writing code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/comment-page-1/#comment-32880</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/#comment-32880</guid>
		<description>DeLong salivates at the thought of open source failing, even though the irony of it is that Perl and other open source packages made it possible for SixApart to create a tight, cheap blog suite that he uses to post that comment. He also cannot bring himself to admit that most of the &quot;community attacks&quot; on closed source software are done by fanboy trolls, not real developers or supporters. The actual developers and supporters are rarely the utopian ideologues.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeLong salivates at the thought of open source failing, even though the irony of it is that Perl and other open source packages made it possible for SixApart to create a tight, cheap blog suite that he uses to post that comment. He also cannot bring himself to admit that most of the &#8220;community attacks&#8221; on closed source software are done by fanboy trolls, not real developers or supporters. The actual developers and supporters are rarely the utopian ideologues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeT</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/comment-page-1/#comment-52063</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/03/06/news-flash-larry-ellison-is-a-megalomaniac/#comment-52063</guid>
		<description>DeLong salivates at the thought of open source failing, even though the irony of it is that Perl and other open source packages made it possible for SixApart to create a tight, cheap blog suite that he uses to post that comment. He also cannot bring himself to admit that most of the &quot;community attacks&quot; on closed source software are done by fanboy trolls, not real developers or supporters. The actual developers and supporters are rarely the utopian ideologues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeLong salivates at the thought of open source failing, even though the irony of it is that Perl and other open source packages made it possible for SixApart to create a tight, cheap blog suite that he uses to post that comment. He also cannot bring himself to admit that most of the &#8220;community attacks&#8221; on closed source software are done by fanboy trolls, not real developers or supporters. The actual developers and supporters are rarely the utopian ideologues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
