Wyden on Net Neutrality: If You Build It, We Will Regulate

by on March 3, 2006 · 2 comments

Sen. Wyden yesterday introduced legislation to mandate “net neutrality” by Internet network operators. the proposal is pretty far ranging, banning everything from “priority lanes” for time-sensitive traffic to requiring transparent rates, terms and conditions for service (one wonders how the famously confidential but sucessful Internet backbone market would fare under such a requirement).

It’s a bad idea–for reasons many have outlined. (For an excellent discussion of the issues, check out this excellent study by Christopher Yoo published by the Progress and Freedom Foundation.)

What particularly got my eye, however, was a comment Wyden made to journalists defending the proposal. He said:

You kind of get the sense big network operators are saying we built he network we own the network. What I am saying no, consumers built network subscribers built the network, they paying for it (sic).

Imagine! Just because the operators built it they think they own it. Amazing. Next thing you know, everyone will be claiming they own what they built.

Wyden’s “this really isn’t private property” argument actually isn’t new. It’s a retread from the battle over forced access to telecom networks, where proponents argued that telephone networks belonged to the public, not to telephone companies. That argument was baseless, as I argued here.

If anything, declaring that privately-built Internet facilities belong to the “public” is less justified. Just because Internet providers get their revenue from customers doesn’t mean the customers “own” the facilities. Otherwise, I’d own vast stakes in everything from Starbucks to my dry cleaner. Moreover, at a time when private investment in the Internet is critically needed, loose talk about the network being socialized is definitely unhelpful, to say the least.

  • Nobody

    You really can’t use this post as authority for the claim that “This legislation would completely ban charges to application and service providers so that all fees for broadband would be paid directly by consumers.”

    You know darn well that application and service providers already pay (huge) fees for bandwith. They are consumers. You are misleading your readers by implying that Wyden’s legislation would “ban” these fees. If you are going to argue against net neutrality, it would be cool if you would do it honestly.

  • Nobody

    You really can’t use this post as authority for the claim that “This legislation would completely ban charges to application and service providers so that all fees for broadband would be paid directly by consumers.”

    You know darn well that application and service providers already pay (huge) fees for bandwith. They are consumers. You are misleading your readers by implying that Wyden’s legislation would “ban” these fees. If you are going to argue against net neutrality, it would be cool if you would do it honestly.

Previous post:

Next post: