
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tollbooths on the Internet Highway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2006/02/21/tollbooths-on-the-internet-highway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/02/21/tollbooths-on-the-internet-highway/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 08:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Felten</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/02/21/tollbooths-on-the-internet-highway/comment-page-1/#comment-32778</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Felten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/02/21/tollbooths-on-the-internet-highway/#comment-32778</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Competition is the best way to solve this problem.  But the difficult issue is whether we can have a truly competitive market.  Competition is good for many reasons; but can it really be achieved by pulling the available public policy levers?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My sense is that the smarter advocates of net neutrality regulation support pro-competition policies but think those policies will have only limited success.  They see regulation as a second best solution that will become necessary if, as they expect, the market is not competitive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competition is the best way to solve this problem.  But the difficult issue is whether we can have a truly competitive market.  Competition is good for many reasons; but can it really be achieved by pulling the available public policy levers?</p>

<p>My sense is that the smarter advocates of net neutrality regulation support pro-competition policies but think those policies will have only limited success.  They see regulation as a second best solution that will become necessary if, as they expect, the market is not competitive.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Felten</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2006/02/21/tollbooths-on-the-internet-highway/comment-page-1/#comment-46283</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Felten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2006/02/21/tollbooths-on-the-internet-highway/#comment-46283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Competition is the best way to solve this problem.  But the difficult issue is whether we can have a truly competitive market.  Competition is good for many reasons; but can it really be achieved by pulling the available public policy levers?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My sense is that the smarter advocates of net neutrality regulation support pro-competition policies but think those policies will have only limited success.  They see regulation as a second best solution that will become necessary if, as they expect, the market is not competitive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competition is the best way to solve this problem.  But the difficult issue is whether we can have a truly competitive market.  Competition is good for many reasons; but can it really be achieved by pulling the available public policy levers?<br /><br />My sense is that the smarter advocates of net neutrality regulation support pro-competition policies but think those policies will have only limited success.  They see regulation as a second best solution that will become necessary if, as they expect, the market is not competitive.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

