Comments on: Software Libre http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:58:44 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-32755 tramadol Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:47:59 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-32755 81e31de21f46 Great work <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol 81e31de21f46 Great work tramadol tramadol

]]> By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-54197 tramadol Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:47:59 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-54197 81e31de21f46 Great work <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol 81e31de21f46 Great work tramadol tramadol

]]> By: olivier chaussavoine http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-54196 olivier chaussavoine Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:43:38 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-54196 There are more information on <a href="http://www.openbarter.net">http://www.openbarter.net</a> now in english... But If you consider my message has no meaning, why do'nt you erase it???? There are more information on http://www.openbarter.net now in english… But If you consider my message has no meaning, why do’nt you erase it????

]]> By: olivier chaussavoine http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-32754 olivier chaussavoine Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:43:38 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-32754 There are more information on http://www.openbarter.net now in english... But If you consider my message has no meaning, why do'nt you erase it???? There are more information on http://www.openbarter.net now in english… But If you consider my message has no meaning, why do’nt you erase it????

]]> By: Commons Music http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-32753 Commons Music Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:34:09 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-32753 "I left his post befuddled because it seemed he said lots of things and nothing at all."<br /><br />Welcome to my world. “I left his post befuddled because it seemed he said lots of things and nothing at all.”

Welcome to my world.

]]> By: Commons Music http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-54195 Commons Music Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:34:09 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-54195 "I left his post befuddled because it seemed he said lots of things and nothing at all."<br></br><br>Welcome to my world.<br></br> “I left his post befuddled because it seemed he said lots of things and nothing at all.”

Welcome to my world.

]]> By: olivier chaussavoine http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-32752 olivier chaussavoine Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:32:48 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-32752 The following is not honestly directly related to this article, but an occasion for a developper to inform you about a software I created that is directly related to your field of concern. It's a new concept about barter where people make bids and where best compromise between them are automatically found. It allows economic exchanges without the need of money and could really help countries where economy is paralyzed by the lack of financial ressources. The tool proves if is possible to build such a search engine, and works fine, but you will see it cannot be used practically yet. I have ideas on the next step that would make it economically usable. You can visit http://www.openbarter.net or email me on olivier.chaussavoine@laposte.net if you want to know more on the subject. The following is not honestly directly related to this article, but an occasion for a developper to inform you about a software I created that is directly related to your field of concern. It’s a new concept about barter where people make bids and where best compromise between them are automatically found. It allows economic exchanges without the need of money and could really help countries where economy is paralyzed by the lack of financial ressources. The tool proves if is possible to build such a search engine, and works fine, but you will see it cannot be used practically yet. I have ideas on the next step that would make it economically usable. You can visit http://www.openbarter.net or email me on olivier.chaussavoine@laposte.net if you want to know more on the subject.

]]> By: olivier chaussavoine http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-54194 olivier chaussavoine Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:32:48 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-54194 The following is not honestly directly related to this article, but an occasion for a developper to inform you about a software I created that is directly related to your field of concern. It's a new concept about barter where people make bids and where best compromise between them are automatically found. It allows economic exchanges without the need of money and could really help countries where economy is paralyzed by the lack of financial ressources. The tool proves if is possible to build such a search engine, and works fine, but you will see it cannot be used practically yet. I have ideas on the next step that would make it economically usable. You can visit <a href="http://www.openbarter.net">http://www.openbarter.net</a> or email me on <a href="mailto:olivier.chaussavoine@laposte.net">olivier.chaussavoine@laposte.net</a> if you want to know more on the subject. The following is not honestly directly related to this article, but an occasion for a developper to inform you about a software I created that is directly related to your field of concern. It’s a new concept about barter where people make bids and where best compromise between them are automatically found. It allows economic exchanges without the need of money and could really help countries where economy is paralyzed by the lack of financial ressources. The tool proves if is possible to build such a search engine, and works fine, but you will see it cannot be used practically yet. I have ideas on the next step that would make it economically usable. You can visit http://www.openbarter.net or email me on olivier.chaussavoine@laposte.net if you want to know more on the subject.

]]> By: LewisB http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-32751 LewisB Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:41:36 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-32751 While the insight above seems a reasonable guess as to what Mr. DeLong is thinking, I'd really like to hear him say for himself what his point is supposed to be. I left his post befuddled because it seemed he said lots of things and nothing at all. Is his post honestly supposed to be a criticism of open-source software? Or is there something else going on? While the insight above seems a reasonable guess as to what Mr. DeLong is thinking, I’d really like to hear him say for himself what his point is supposed to be. I left his post befuddled because it seemed he said lots of things and nothing at all.

Is his post honestly supposed to be a criticism of open-source software? Or is there something else going on?

]]> By: LewisB http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-54193 LewisB Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:41:36 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-54193 While the insight above seems a reasonable guess as to what Mr. DeLong is thinking, I'd really like to hear him say for himself what his point is supposed to be. I left his post befuddled because it seemed he said lots of things and nothing at all.<br><br>Is his post honestly supposed to be a criticism of open-source software? Or is there something else going on? While the insight above seems a reasonable guess as to what Mr. DeLong is thinking, I’d really like to hear him say for himself what his point is supposed to be. I left his post befuddled because it seemed he said lots of things and nothing at all.

Is his post honestly supposed to be a criticism of open-source software? Or is there something else going on?

]]> By: MikeT http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-32750 MikeT Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:26:13 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-32750 <a href="http://blindmindseye.com/2006/02/16/not-all-reciprocity-is-the-same/" rel="nofollow">I have similar issues with his position</a>. DeLong seems to be one of those guys who thinks that if money is not involved, that something is wrong. His problems is one of ideology. He's convinced that greed should be the primary motivation in production. Torvalds would probably like to have DeLong's money, but it wouldn't do much in terms of providing solid code for the kernel. If you think of it from a program manager, not an IP attorney's perspective, it makes sense. Throwing money at the problem won't solve it from a technical POV. I have similar issues with his position. DeLong seems to be one of those guys who thinks that if money is not involved, that something is wrong. His problems is one of ideology. He’s convinced that greed should be the primary motivation in production.

Torvalds would probably like to have DeLong’s money, but it wouldn’t do much in terms of providing solid code for the kernel. If you think of it from a program manager, not an IP attorney’s perspective, it makes sense. Throwing money at the problem won’t solve it from a technical POV.

]]> By: MikeT http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/comment-page-1/#comment-54192 MikeT Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:26:13 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/02/17/software-libre/#comment-54192 <a href="http://blindmindseye.com/2006/02/16/not-all-reciprocity-is-the-same/" rel="nofollow">I have similar issues with his position</a>. DeLong seems to be one of those guys who thinks that if money is not involved, that something is wrong. His problems is one of ideology. He's convinced that greed should be the primary motivation in production.<br><br>Torvalds would probably like to have DeLong's money, but it wouldn't do much in terms of providing solid code for the kernel. If you think of it from a program manager, not an IP attorney's perspective, it makes sense. Throwing money at the problem won't solve it from a technical POV. I have similar issues with his position. DeLong seems to be one of those guys who thinks that if money is not involved, that something is wrong. His problems is one of ideology. He’s convinced that greed should be the primary motivation in production.

Torvalds would probably like to have DeLong’s money, but it wouldn’t do much in terms of providing solid code for the kernel. If you think of it from a program manager, not an IP attorney’s perspective, it makes sense. Throwing money at the problem won’t solve it from a technical POV.

]]>