Comments on: A Friendly Conversation about Corporate High-Tech Engagement with China http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Fri, 25 May 2012 08:22:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/comment-page-1/#comment-32563 tramadol Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:36:53 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-32563 <p>81e31de21f46 Great work http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol</p> 81e31de21f46 Great work http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol

]]> By: tramadol http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/comment-page-1/#comment-48299 tramadol Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:36:53 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-48299 <p>81e31de21f46 Great work <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav">http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav</a> tramadol</p> 81e31de21f46 Great work http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol

]]> By: short url http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/comment-page-1/#comment-32562 short url Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:31:13 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-32562 <p>da6c15eee5a4 Very good http:/0zu.tw/ short url</p> da6c15eee5a4 Very good http:/0zu.tw/ short url

]]> By: short url http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/comment-page-1/#comment-48298 short url Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:31:13 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-48298 <p>da6c15eee5a4 Very good http:/0zu.tw/ short url</p> da6c15eee5a4 Very good http:/0zu.tw/ short url

]]> By: Jim Harper http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/comment-page-1/#comment-32561 Jim Harper Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:35:02 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-32561 <p>Stan, I've spoken to people at Google about their practices and, as I say in the piece, they haven't been very forthcoming.</p> <p>Seems you went ahead and "dialogued" about our piece without doing any original research, a practice deleterious to intelligent conversation, IYHO. <p>If you disagree with some of our facts or assumptions, perhaps you'd like to say what your disagreements are. I dare say "lazy" applies to someone who takes potshots (that miss) but doesn't add any information or opinion.</p></p> Stan, I’ve spoken to people at Google about their practices and, as I say in the piece, they haven’t been very forthcoming.

Seems you went ahead and “dialogued” about our piece without doing any original research, a practice deleterious to intelligent conversation, IYHO.

If you disagree with some of our facts or assumptions, perhaps you’d like to say what your disagreements are. I dare say “lazy” applies to someone who takes potshots (that miss) but doesn’t add any information or opinion.

]]> By: Jim Harper http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/comment-page-1/#comment-48297 Jim Harper Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:35:02 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-48297 <p>Stan, I've spoken to people at Google about their practices and, as I say in the piece, they haven't been very forthcoming.</p> <p>Seems you went ahead and "dialogued" about our piece without doing any original research, a practice deleterious to intelligent conversation, IYHO. </p> <p>If you disagree with some of our facts or assumptions, perhaps you'd like to say what your disagreements are. I dare say "lazy" applies to someone who takes potshots (that miss) but doesn't add any information or opinion.</p> Stan, I’ve spoken to people at Google about their practices and, as I say in the piece, they haven’t been very forthcoming.

Seems you went ahead and “dialogued” about our piece without doing any original research, a practice deleterious to intelligent conversation, IYHO.

If you disagree with some of our facts or assumptions, perhaps you’d like to say what your disagreements are. I dare say “lazy” applies to someone who takes potshots (that miss) but doesn’t add any information or opinion.

]]> By: Stan Bing http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/comment-page-1/#comment-32560 Stan Bing Tue, 24 Jan 2006 03:08:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-32560 <p>Just wondering if you contacted any of these companies for comment prior to dialoging about their business. By reading this, it seems the answer is "no." IMHO, in order to have an intelligent conversation about this issue some original research might first take place. Relying on France-based "reporters without borders" placed editorials for your information on this topic is, at best, lazy and, at worse, a disservice to your organizations and those who support your "work."</p> Just wondering if you contacted any of these companies for comment prior to dialoging about their business. By reading this, it seems the answer is “no.” IMHO, in order to have an intelligent conversation about this issue some original research might first take place. Relying on France-based “reporters without borders” placed editorials for your information on this topic is, at best, lazy and, at worse, a disservice to your organizations and those who support your “work.”

]]> By: Stan Bing http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/comment-page-1/#comment-48296 Stan Bing Tue, 24 Jan 2006 03:08:49 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-48296 <p>Just wondering if you contacted any of these companies for comment prior to dialoging about their business. By reading this, it seems the answer is "no." IMHO, in order to have an intelligent conversation about this issue some original research might first take place. Relying on France-based "reporters without borders" placed editorials for your information on this topic is, at best, lazy and, at worse, a disservice to your organizations and those who support your "work."</p> Just wondering if you contacted any of these companies for comment prior to dialoging about their business. By reading this, it seems the answer is “no.” IMHO, in order to have an intelligent conversation about this issue some original research might first take place. Relying on France-based “reporters without borders” placed editorials for your information on this topic is, at best, lazy and, at worse, a disservice to your organizations and those who support your “work.”

]]>