
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Class Citizens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Poe</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-32450</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Poe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/#comment-32450</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Broadcast Protection Discussion Group (BPDG), which operates within a larger structure called the Copy Protection Technical Working Group (CPTWG), at one point, had an email list going, and, during that time, put forth a draft for consensus, which included a footnote (#12, I believe) which explicitly exempted the studios from any of the requirements.  When I raised that footnote as an issue, there was no satisfactory reply given.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The studios&#039; intentions are, indeed, obvious, and your insight is well-documented in history.  The exemption issue is huge, and I hope you continue to pursue this aspect of their ridiculous attempts to shut down the empowerment of individuals, by removing technology choices.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broadcast Protection Discussion Group (BPDG), which operates within a larger structure called the Copy Protection Technical Working Group (CPTWG), at one point, had an email list going, and, during that time, put forth a draft for consensus, which included a footnote (#12, I believe) which explicitly exempted the studios from any of the requirements.  When I raised that footnote as an issue, there was no satisfactory reply given.</p>

<p>The studios&#8217; intentions are, indeed, obvious, and your insight is well-documented in history.  The exemption issue is huge, and I hope you continue to pursue this aspect of their ridiculous attempts to shut down the empowerment of individuals, by removing technology choices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Poe</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-51631</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Poe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/#comment-51631</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Broadcast Protection Discussion Group (BPDG), which operates within a larger structure called the Copy Protection Technical Working Group (CPTWG), at one point, had an email list going, and, during that time, put forth a draft for consensus, which included a footnote (#12, I believe) which explicitly exempted the studios from any of the requirements.  When I raised that footnote as an issue, there was no satisfactory reply given.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The studios&#039; intentions are, indeed, obvious, and your insight is well-documented in history.  The exemption issue is huge, and I hope you continue to pursue this aspect of their ridiculous attempts to shut down the empowerment of individuals, by removing technology choices.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broadcast Protection Discussion Group (BPDG), which operates within a larger structure called the Copy Protection Technical Working Group (CPTWG), at one point, had an email list going, and, during that time, put forth a draft for consensus, which included a footnote (#12, I believe) which explicitly exempted the studios from any of the requirements.  When I raised that footnote as an issue, there was no satisfactory reply given.<br /><br />The studios&#8217; intentions are, indeed, obvious, and your insight is well-documented in history.  The exemption issue is huge, and I hope you continue to pursue this aspect of their ridiculous attempts to shut down the empowerment of individuals, by removing technology choices.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ike</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-32449</link>
		<dc:creator>ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/#comment-32449</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why does this not surpise me? I am amazed at how long they think this will last.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With McCain&#039;s &quot;reforms&quot; bloggers are now legally journalists.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This law will be a joke.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this not surpise me? I am amazed at how long they think this will last.</p>

<p>With McCain&#8217;s &#8220;reforms&#8221; bloggers are now legally journalists.</p>

<p>This law will be a joke.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ike</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-51630</link>
		<dc:creator>ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/12/19/second-class-citizens/#comment-51630</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why does this not surpise me? I am amazed at how long they think this will last.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With McCain&#039;s &quot;reforms&quot; bloggers are now legally journalists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This law will be a joke.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this not surpise me? I am amazed at how long they think this will last.<br /><br />With McCain&#8217;s &#8220;reforms&#8221; bloggers are now legally journalists.<br /><br />This law will be a joke.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

