http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/ Keeping politicians' hands off the Net & everything else related to technology Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:24:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-32335 shorturl Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:25:37 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/#comment-32335 ceebec06a321 Nice site <a href="http:/0zu.tw/" rel="nofollow">shorturl</a> shorturl ceebec06a321 Nice site shorturl shorturl

]]> http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-53920 shorturl Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:25:37 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/#comment-53920 ceebec06a321 Nice site <a href="http:/0zu.tw/" rel="nofollow">shorturl</a> shorturl ceebec06a321 Nice site shorturl shorturl

]]> http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-32334 Tim Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:59:58 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/#comment-32334 Randolph: I agree that there's nothing wrong with TiVo allowing its customers to convert their legally-recorded video to other formats. What I object to is the monopoly on that functionality that's created by the DMCA--a monopoly whose profits go to TiVo, not to the owners of the copyrighted content that's being converted. If it weren't for the DMCA, TiVo wouldn't be able to charge very much money for this service because you would be able to download conversion utilities made by other vendors for free. TiVo's profits on this product are going to be entirely due to the monopoly created by the DMCA. And given that TiVo hasn't produced any of the content in question, I don't see any reason why they should be given monopoly profits by copyright law. Randolph: I agree that there’s nothing wrong with TiVo allowing its customers to convert their legally-recorded video to other formats. What I object to is the monopoly on that functionality that’s created by the DMCA–a monopoly whose profits go to TiVo, not to the owners of the copyrighted content that’s being converted. If it weren’t for the DMCA, TiVo wouldn’t be able to charge very much money for this service because you would be able to download conversion utilities made by other vendors for free. TiVo’s profits on this product are going to be entirely due to the monopoly created by the DMCA. And given that TiVo hasn’t produced any of the content in question, I don’t see any reason why they should be given monopoly profits by copyright law.

]]> http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-53919 Tim Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:59:58 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/#comment-53919 Randolph: I agree that there's nothing wrong with TiVo allowing its customers to convert their legally-recorded video to other formats. What I object to is the monopoly on that functionality that's created by the DMCA--a monopoly whose profits go to TiVo, not to the owners of the copyrighted content that's being converted. If it weren't for the DMCA, TiVo wouldn't be able to charge very much money for this service because you would be able to download conversion utilities made by other vendors for free. TiVo's profits on this product are going to be entirely due to the monopoly created by the DMCA. And given that TiVo hasn't produced any of the content in question, I don't see any reason why they should be given monopoly profits by copyright law. Randolph: I agree that there’s nothing wrong with TiVo allowing its customers to convert their legally-recorded video to other formats. What I object to is the monopoly on that functionality that’s created by the DMCA–a monopoly whose profits go to TiVo, not to the owners of the copyrighted content that’s being converted. If it weren’t for the DMCA, TiVo wouldn’t be able to charge very much money for this service because you would be able to download conversion utilities made by other vendors for free. TiVo’s profits on this product are going to be entirely due to the monopoly created by the DMCA. And given that TiVo hasn’t produced any of the content in question, I don’t see any reason why they should be given monopoly profits by copyright law.

]]> http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-32333 Randolph Miller Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:41:30 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/#comment-32333 I don't agree that TiVo should get in trouble for letting it's customers convert their TV shows into a different video file format so they can be viewed on the iPod. We're talking about people who had legal access to the show (on broadcast or cable) and made a copy and now just want to watch that show on a portable player. They're basically charging for a video file conversion service on a per show basis. If someone amassed a huge library of TV shows legally on the Betamax tapes and just realized they want to switch to VHS or DVD, I don't see why it would be a big deal for a company to do the conversion for them. Yes, the company would have to charge money. That's what computers are designed to do: convert from CD to hard drive and network card to the printer and so on. A computer is really just a digital photocopier. There's nothing wrong with that. I don’t agree that TiVo should get in trouble for letting it’s customers convert their TV shows into a different video file format so they can be viewed on the iPod. We’re talking about people who had legal access to the show (on broadcast or cable) and made a copy and now just want to watch that show on a portable player. They’re basically charging for a video file conversion service on a per show basis. If someone amassed a huge library of TV shows legally on the Betamax tapes and just realized they want to switch to VHS or DVD, I don’t see why it would be a big deal for a company to do the conversion for them. Yes, the company would have to charge money. That’s what computers are designed to do: convert from CD to hard drive and network card to the printer and so on. A computer is really just a digital photocopier. There’s nothing wrong with that.

]]> http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-53918 Randolph Miller Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:41:30 +0000 http://techliberation.com/2005/11/21/whose-copyright-is-it-anyway/#comment-53918 I don't agree that TiVo should get in trouble for letting it's customers convert their TV shows into a different video file format so they can be viewed on the iPod. We're talking about people who had legal access to the show (on broadcast or cable) and made a copy and now just want to watch that show on a portable player. They're basically charging for a video file conversion service on a per show basis. If someone amassed a huge library of TV shows legally on the Betamax tapes and just realized they want to switch to VHS or DVD, I don't see why it would be a big deal for a company to do the conversion for them. Yes, the company would have to charge money. That's what computers are designed to do: convert from CD to hard drive and network card to the printer and so on. A computer is really just a digital photocopier. There's nothing wrong with that. I don’t agree that TiVo should get in trouble for letting it’s customers convert their TV shows into a different video file format so they can be viewed on the iPod. We’re talking about people who had legal access to the show (on broadcast or cable) and made a copy and now just want to watch that show on a portable player. They’re basically charging for a video file conversion service on a per show basis. If someone amassed a huge library of TV shows legally on the Betamax tapes and just realized they want to switch to VHS or DVD, I don’t see why it would be a big deal for a company to do the conversion for them. Yes, the company would have to charge money. That’s what computers are designed to do: convert from CD to hard drive and network card to the printer and so on. A computer is really just a digital photocopier. There’s nothing wrong with that.

]]>