
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The DMCA vs. Interoperability, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2005/11/18/the-dmca-vs-interoperability-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/11/18/the-dmca-vs-interoperability-part-2/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lay</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/11/18/the-dmca-vs-interoperability-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-32329</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/11/18/the-dmca-vs-interoperability-part-2/#comment-32329</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tim, your posts on this subject are outstanding.  What the hardheads at PFF refuse to admit is that the DMCA anti-circumvention provision is a prime example of what the PFF usually inveighs against - a regulatory distortion of the free market. The anti-circumvention provision prevents entrepreneurs from providing consumers with products that would enable interoperability between different digital content formats.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, your posts on this subject are outstanding.  What the hardheads at PFF refuse to admit is that the DMCA anti-circumvention provision is a prime example of what the PFF usually inveighs against &#8211; a regulatory distortion of the free market. The anti-circumvention provision prevents entrepreneurs from providing consumers with products that would enable interoperability between different digital content formats.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lay</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/11/18/the-dmca-vs-interoperability-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-54337</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/11/18/the-dmca-vs-interoperability-part-2/#comment-54337</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tim, your posts on this subject are outstanding.  What the hardheads at PFF refuse to admit is that the DMCA anti-circumvention provision is a prime example of what the PFF usually inveighs against - a regulatory distortion of the free market. The anti-circumvention provision prevents entrepreneurs from providing consumers with products that would enable interoperability between different digital content formats.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, your posts on this subject are outstanding.  What the hardheads at PFF refuse to admit is that the DMCA anti-circumvention provision is a prime example of what the PFF usually inveighs against &#8211; a regulatory distortion of the free market. The anti-circumvention provision prevents entrepreneurs from providing consumers with products that would enable interoperability between different digital content formats.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

