
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cell Phones in Cars: A Rare Case for Regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramadol</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-31840</link>
		<dc:creator>tramadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-31840</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Great work    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tramadol&lt;/a&gt; tramadol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Great work    <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramadol</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-51870</link>
		<dc:creator>tramadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-51870</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;81e31de21f46 Great work    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tramadol&lt;/a&gt; tramadol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81e31de21f46 Great work    <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav" rel="nofollow">tramadol</a> tramadol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disney World</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-51869</link>
		<dc:creator>Disney World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 10:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-51869</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;great vacation info on disney world in orlando florida , seaworld, universal studios&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great vacation info on disney world in orlando florida , seaworld, universal studios</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disney World</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-31839</link>
		<dc:creator>Disney World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 09:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-31839</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;great vacation info on disney world in orlando florida , seaworld, universal studios&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great vacation info on disney world in orlando florida , seaworld, universal studios</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: o.o.</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-31838</link>
		<dc:creator>o.o.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-31838</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;every year 2,300 people die and 300,000 people are injured aas the result of accidents cause by driveres talking on cell phones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;87% of cell phone users who drive talk on their phone occasionally while driveing
27% talk on their cell phones on over helf their trips&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;in the united kingdom and germany if you cause an accident as the result of talking on a cell phone while driving your lisense is taken away and you pay a fine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;legislation similar would solve the problem of cell phones in cars in the u.s. because it doesnt completely outlaw cell phones in cars it just encourages people to not talk on them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;cars are meant to get from point a to point b in, cells phones in cars only increase the chances of things going wrong during this simple task, why would we want to complicate things?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>every year 2,300 people die and 300,000 people are injured aas the result of accidents cause by driveres talking on cell phones.</p>

<p>87% of cell phone users who drive talk on their phone occasionally while driveing
27% talk on their cell phones on over helf their trips</p>

<p>in the united kingdom and germany if you cause an accident as the result of talking on a cell phone while driving your lisense is taken away and you pay a fine.</p>

<p>legislation similar would solve the problem of cell phones in cars in the u.s. because it doesnt completely outlaw cell phones in cars it just encourages people to not talk on them.</p>

<p>cars are meant to get from point a to point b in, cells phones in cars only increase the chances of things going wrong during this simple task, why would we want to complicate things?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: o.o.</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-51868</link>
		<dc:creator>o.o.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-51868</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;every year 2,300 people die and 300,000 people are injured aas the result of accidents cause by driveres talking on cell phones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;87% of cell phone users who drive talk on their phone occasionally while driveing&lt;br&gt;27% talk on their cell phones on over helf their trips&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;in the united kingdom and germany if you cause an accident as the result of talking on a cell phone while driving your lisense is taken away and you pay a fine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;legislation similar would solve the problem of cell phones in cars in the u.s. because it doesnt completely outlaw cell phones in cars it just encourages people to not talk on them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;cars are meant to get from point a to point b in, cells phones in cars only increase the chances of things going wrong during this simple task, why would we want to complicate things?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>every year 2,300 people die and 300,000 people are injured aas the result of accidents cause by driveres talking on cell phones.<br /><br />87% of cell phone users who drive talk on their phone occasionally while driveing<br />27% talk on their cell phones on over helf their trips<br /><br />in the united kingdom and germany if you cause an accident as the result of talking on a cell phone while driving your lisense is taken away and you pay a fine.<br /><br />legislation similar would solve the problem of cell phones in cars in the u.s. because it doesnt completely outlaw cell phones in cars it just encourages people to not talk on them.<br /><br />cars are meant to get from point a to point b in, cells phones in cars only increase the chances of things going wrong during this simple task, why would we want to complicate things?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idiot</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-31837</link>
		<dc:creator>idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-31837</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i am an idiot and i am lead by richard simmons&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am an idiot and i am lead by richard simmons</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idiot</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-51867</link>
		<dc:creator>idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-51867</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i am an idiot and i am lead by richard simmons&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am an idiot and i am lead by richard simmons</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sikozu</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-51866</link>
		<dc:creator>sikozu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 05:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-51866</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just as your right to wave your fist stops at my nose, your right to chat while driving stops at my bumper.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s all well and good except that what you are advocating for is a law that prevents me from talking on the phone in my car regardless of my proximity to your bumper. Perhaps a better solution (if there just &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; to be one) would be to impose a penalty if it can be proved that cell phone use contributed to a collision.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are any number of things that cause inattention to driving... why stop at cell phone use? Why not include talking with a passenger or eating food or listening to the radio? This sounds like a slippery slope.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Just as your right to wave your fist stops at my nose, your right to chat while driving stops at my bumper.</blockquote>

<p><br /></p>

<p>That&#8217;s all well and good except that what you are advocating for is a law that prevents me from talking on the phone in my car regardless of my proximity to your bumper. Perhaps a better solution (if there just <i>has</i> to be one) would be to impose a penalty if it can be proved that cell phone use contributed to a collision.</p>

<p>There are any number of things that cause inattention to driving&#8230; why stop at cell phone use? Why not include talking with a passenger or eating food or listening to the radio? This sounds like a slippery slope.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sikozu</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-31836</link>
		<dc:creator>sikozu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 04:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-31836</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just as your right to wave your fist stops at my nose, your right to chat while driving stops at my bumper.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s all well and good except that what you are advocating for is a law that prevents me from talking on the phone in my car regardless of my proximity to your bumper. Perhaps a better solution (if there just &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; to be one) would be to impose a penalty if it can be proved that cell phone use contributed to a collision.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are any number of things that cause inattention to driving... why stop at cell phone use? Why not include talking with a passenger or eating food or listening to the radio? This sounds like a slippery slope.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Just as your right to wave your fist stops at my nose, your right to chat while driving stops at my bumper.</blockquote>

<p>That&#8217;s all well and good except that what you are advocating for is a law that prevents me from talking on the phone in my car regardless of my proximity to your bumper. Perhaps a better solution (if there just <i>has</i> to be one) would be to impose a penalty if it can be proved that cell phone use contributed to a collision.</p>

<p>There are any number of things that cause inattention to driving&#8230; why stop at cell phone use? Why not include talking with a passenger or eating food or listening to the radio? This sounds like a slippery slope.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-51865</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-51865</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can any organization with a name like the &quot;Insurance Institute for Highway Safety&quot; be at all impartial or objective?  Sounds like the same nannies that brought us mandatory seat belt laws and .08 DUI criteria (soon headed to .04 BAC is suspect).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can any organization with a name like the &#8220;Insurance Institute for Highway Safety&#8221; be at all impartial or objective?  Sounds like the same nannies that brought us mandatory seat belt laws and .08 DUI criteria (soon headed to .04 BAC is suspect).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-31835</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 02:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/07/15/cell-phones-in-cars-a-rare-case-for-regulation/#comment-31835</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can any organization with a name like the &quot;Insurance Institute for Highway Safety&quot; be at all impartial or objective?  Sounds like the same nannies that brought us mandatory seat belt laws and .08 DUI criteria (soon headed to .04 BAC is suspect).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can any organization with a name like the &#8220;Insurance Institute for Highway Safety&#8221; be at all impartial or objective?  Sounds like the same nannies that brought us mandatory seat belt laws and .08 DUI criteria (soon headed to .04 BAC is suspect).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

