<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Cato study on DRM &#038; P2P</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/</link>
	<description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: short url</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/#comment-30908</link>
		<dc:creator>short url</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/#comment-30908</guid>
		<description>1b37d90b1c24 Very good     http:/0zu.tw/ short url

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1b37d90b1c24 Very good     http:/0zu.tw/ short url</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: short url</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/#comment-44768</link>
		<dc:creator>short url</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/#comment-44768</guid>
		<description>1b37d90b1c24 Very good     http:/0zu.tw/ short url</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1b37d90b1c24 Very good     http:/0zu.tw/ short url</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Slater</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/#comment-30907</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/#comment-30907</guid>
		<description>Adam, along with comments on the P2P and DRM paper, I've posted some belated responses to your August post here:
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2005/02/21#a1039
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, along with comments on the P2P and DRM paper, I&#8217;ve posted some belated responses to your August post here:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2005/02/21#a1039" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2005/02/21#a1039</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Slater</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/#comment-44767</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2005/02/16/new-cato-study-on-drm-p2p/#comment-44767</guid>
		<description>Adam, along with comments on the P2P and DRM paper, I've posted some belated responses to your August post here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2005/02/21#a1039"&gt;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2005/02/2...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, along with comments on the P2P and DRM paper, I&#8217;ve posted some belated responses to your August post here:<br /><a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2005/02/21#a1039"></a><a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2005/02/2.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2005/02/2..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
