
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Computer Software Receive Copyright Protection?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gattuso</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-30855</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gattuso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/#comment-30855</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Adam -- It doesn&#039;t seem Ahronian raises a real &quot;case or controversy&quot; for the courts -- he&#039;s just asking for a declarary judgment by the courts without any specific dispute at hand.  Whatever the merits, the courts will throw this out until there&#039;s an actual disute with an actual patent at hand.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam &#8212; It doesn&#8217;t seem Ahronian raises a real &#8220;case or controversy&#8221; for the courts &#8212; he&#8217;s just asking for a declarary judgment by the courts without any specific dispute at hand.  Whatever the merits, the courts will throw this out until there&#8217;s an actual disute with an actual patent at hand.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Gattuso</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-46862</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gattuso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/#comment-46862</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Adam -- It doesn&#039;t seem Ahronian raises a real &quot;case or controversy&quot; for the courts -- he&#039;s just asking for a declarary judgment by the courts without any specific dispute at hand.  Whatever the merits, the courts will throw this out until there&#039;s an actual disute with an actual patent at hand.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam &#8212; It doesn&#8217;t seem Ahronian raises a real &#8220;case or controversy&#8221; for the courts &#8212; he&#8217;s just asking for a declarary judgment by the courts without any specific dispute at hand.  Whatever the merits, the courts will throw this out until there&#8217;s an actual disute with an actual patent at hand.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garym</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-30854</link>
		<dc:creator>garym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/#comment-30854</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This suit claims that software copyright protection is unconstitutionally vague, yet claims that patents provide a better alternative.  If this suit succeeds, we might as well forget about having a software industry; legitimate code will be plagiarized without protection, while developers of new code will have to search through an impossible-to-negotiate maze of patents.  (Try reading any software patent and figuring out what it says.)  There will have to be four lawyers to every programmer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s Ahronian&#039;s purpose with this insane lawsuit? To give employment to a horde of patent lawyers, perhaps?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This suit claims that software copyright protection is unconstitutionally vague, yet claims that patents provide a better alternative.  If this suit succeeds, we might as well forget about having a software industry; legitimate code will be plagiarized without protection, while developers of new code will have to search through an impossible-to-negotiate maze of patents.  (Try reading any software patent and figuring out what it says.)  There will have to be four lawyers to every programmer.</p>

<p>What&#8217;s Ahronian&#8217;s purpose with this insane lawsuit? To give employment to a horde of patent lawyers, perhaps?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garym</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-46861</link>
		<dc:creator>garym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/12/14/should-computer-software-receive-copyright-protection/#comment-46861</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This suit claims that software copyright protection is unconstitutionally vague, yet claims that patents provide a better alternative.  If this suit succeeds, we might as well forget about having a software industry; legitimate code will be plagiarized without protection, while developers of new code will have to search through an impossible-to-negotiate maze of patents.  (Try reading any software patent and figuring out what it says.)  There will have to be four lawyers to every programmer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s Ahronian&#039;s purpose with this insane lawsuit? To give employment to a horde of patent lawyers, perhaps?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This suit claims that software copyright protection is unconstitutionally vague, yet claims that patents provide a better alternative.  If this suit succeeds, we might as well forget about having a software industry; legitimate code will be plagiarized without protection, while developers of new code will have to search through an impossible-to-negotiate maze of patents.  (Try reading any software patent and figuring out what it says.)  There will have to be four lawyers to every programmer.<br /><br />What&#8217;s Ahronian&#8217;s purpose with this insane lawsuit? To give employment to a horde of patent lawyers, perhaps?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

