
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wi-Fi as a Public Utility: What are the Costs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Neuman</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-30728</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Neuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/#comment-30728</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OK, maybe you are right.  On the other hand, the entire Internet started as a public works project.  The Internet Service providers charge an arm and a leg and then want to take advantage of the Net to provide low cost telephone service.  What should be free is in the eye of the beholder.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, maybe you are right.  On the other hand, the entire Internet started as a public works project.  The Internet Service providers charge an arm and a leg and then want to take advantage of the Net to provide low cost telephone service.  What should be free is in the eye of the beholder.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Neuman</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-53512</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Neuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/#comment-53512</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OK, maybe you are right.  On the other hand, the entire Internet started as a public works project.  The Internet Service providers charge an arm and a leg and then want to take advantage of the Net to provide low cost telephone service.  What should be free is in the eye of the beholder.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, maybe you are right.  On the other hand, the entire Internet started as a public works project.  The Internet Service providers charge an arm and a leg and then want to take advantage of the Net to provide low cost telephone service.  What should be free is in the eye of the beholder.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipEsquire</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-53511</link>
		<dc:creator>KipEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/#comment-53511</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is way too much overthinking going on with this issue. Wireless internet access is simply not a public good (it&#039;s perfectly excludable). There is therefore no justification whatsoever for it to be publicly provided. Those concerned about wireless Internet access for the poor (besides having severely misplaced priorities) should consider vouchers or a comparable program.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is way too much overthinking going on with this issue. Wireless internet access is simply not a public good (it&#8217;s perfectly excludable). There is therefore no justification whatsoever for it to be publicly provided. Those concerned about wireless Internet access for the poor (besides having severely misplaced priorities) should consider vouchers or a comparable program.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipEsquire</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-30727</link>
		<dc:creator>KipEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/09/30/wi-fi-as-a-public-utility-what-are-the-costs/#comment-30727</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There is way too much overthinking going on with this issue. Wireless internet access is simply not a public good (it&#039;s perfectly excludable). There is therefore no justification whatsoever for it to be publicly provided. Those concerned about wireless Internet access for the poor (besides having severely misplaced priorities) should consider vouchers or a comparable program.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is way too much overthinking going on with this issue. Wireless internet access is simply not a public good (it&#8217;s perfectly excludable). There is therefore no justification whatsoever for it to be publicly provided. Those concerned about wireless Internet access for the poor (besides having severely misplaced priorities) should consider vouchers or a comparable program.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

