
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brian Cooley on Spam Non-Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/</link>
	<description>Keeping politicians&#039; hands off the Net &#38; everything else related to technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: caribbean mail order pharmacy </title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-49009</link>
		<dc:creator>caribbean mail order pharmacy </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/#comment-49009</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You may find it interesting to check out some relevant pages about&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.showcaserealestate.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; bonus &lt;/a&gt; ... Thanks!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may find it interesting to check out some relevant pages about<a href="http://www.showcaserealestate.net/" rel="nofollow"> bonus </a> &#8230; Thanks!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caribbean mail order pharmacy discount</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-30034</link>
		<dc:creator>caribbean mail order pharmacy discount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/#comment-30034</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You may find it interesting to check out some relevant pages about&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.showcaserealestate.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; bonus &lt;/a&gt; ... Thanks!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may find it interesting to check out some relevant pages about<a href="http://www.showcaserealestate.net/" rel="nofollow"> bonus </a> &#8230; Thanks!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klist</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-49008</link>
		<dc:creator>klist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/#comment-49008</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As far as &quot;we&#039;re pissed about spam because we think of our in-boxes as&lt;br&gt;personal space.&quot;, I think Brian Cooley should be more specific. Working in a&lt;br&gt;IT/engineering department, I see a lot of red-tape and politicking playing such&lt;br&gt;a detrimental role that solving the problem of SPAM in my inbox is not worth my&lt;br&gt;while. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do agree however with Mister Cooley&#039;s statements that &quot;Corporations can&#039;t&lt;br&gt;deal with the spam flood.&quot; and &quot; Spam is costing corporations a fortune to&lt;br&gt;manage.&quot; are fallacies: the availability of knowledge as well as software on the&lt;br&gt;Internet makes the implementation of a solution to such problem relatively&lt;br&gt;simple. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem is that initiative that affects a corporation at a large scale&lt;br&gt;needs support from above. Support comes from understanding every aspect of the&lt;br&gt;problem and the solution. Driven by a &quot;not knowing is a sign of weakness&quot;&lt;br&gt;mantra, large corporations are plagued with C-Level people and decision makers alike&lt;br&gt;that are unwilling to educate themselves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are yet to show the resolve inherent to their position and swat that gnat once and for all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as &#8220;we&#8217;re pissed about spam because we think of our in-boxes as<br />personal space.&#8221;, I think Brian Cooley should be more specific. Working in a<br />IT/engineering department, I see a lot of red-tape and politicking playing such<br />a detrimental role that solving the problem of SPAM in my inbox is not worth my<br />while. </p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>I do agree however with Mister Cooley&#8217;s statements that &#8220;Corporations can&#8217;t<br />deal with the spam flood.&#8221; and &#8221; Spam is costing corporations a fortune to<br />manage.&#8221; are fallacies: the availability of knowledge as well as software on the<br />Internet makes the implementation of a solution to such problem relatively<br />simple. </p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>The problem is that initiative that affects a corporation at a large scale<br />needs support from above. Support comes from understanding every aspect of the<br />problem and the solution. Driven by a &#8220;not knowing is a sign of weakness&#8221;<br />mantra, large corporations are plagued with C-Level people and decision makers alike<br />that are unwilling to educate themselves.</p>

<p><br /></p>

<p>They are yet to show the resolve inherent to their position and swat that gnat once and for all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klist</title>
		<link>http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-30033</link>
		<dc:creator>klist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techliberation.com/2004/09/15/brian-cooley-on-spam-non-crisis/#comment-30033</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As far as &quot;we&#039;re pissed about spam because we think of our in-boxes as
personal space.&quot;, I think Brian Cooley should be more specific. Working in a
IT/engineering department, I see a lot of red-tape and politicking playing such
a detrimental role that solving the problem of SPAM in my inbox is not worth my
while. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do agree however with Mister Cooley&#039;s statements that &quot;Corporations can&#039;t
deal with the spam flood.&quot; and &quot; Spam is costing corporations a fortune to
manage.&quot; are fallacies: the availability of knowledge as well as software on the
Internet makes the implementation of a solution to such problem relatively
simple. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem is that initiative that affects a corporation at a large scale
needs support from above. Support comes from understanding every aspect of the
problem and the solution. Driven by a &quot;not knowing is a sign of weakness&quot;
mantra, large corporations are plagued with C-Level people and decision makers alike
that are unwilling to educate themselves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are yet to show the resolve inherent to their position and swat that gnat once and for all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as &#8220;we&#8217;re pissed about spam because we think of our in-boxes as
personal space.&#8221;, I think Brian Cooley should be more specific. Working in a
IT/engineering department, I see a lot of red-tape and politicking playing such
a detrimental role that solving the problem of SPAM in my inbox is not worth my
while. </p>

<p>I do agree however with Mister Cooley&#8217;s statements that &#8220;Corporations can&#8217;t
deal with the spam flood.&#8221; and &#8221; Spam is costing corporations a fortune to
manage.&#8221; are fallacies: the availability of knowledge as well as software on the
Internet makes the implementation of a solution to such problem relatively
simple. </p>

<p>The problem is that initiative that affects a corporation at a large scale
needs support from above. Support comes from understanding every aspect of the
problem and the solution. Driven by a &#8220;not knowing is a sign of weakness&#8221;
mantra, large corporations are plagued with C-Level people and decision makers alike
that are unwilling to educate themselves.</p>

<p>They are yet to show the resolve inherent to their position and swat that gnat once and for all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

