Tramadol prescription Cheap tramadol online Purchase tramadol Buy soma online Zithromax Discount viagra Football handicapping Nfl predictions Viagra sale online Generic ultram Order xenical online Xanax online Buying viagra Buy paxil Discount soma Vardenafil Soma watson Best poker software Generic paxil Generic ambien Internet casino Credit card debt Valium for sale Personal loan Soma online pharmacy Carisoprodol soma Pokerstars com Online slot Zoloft Asthma Motrin Lipitor Dental assistant Mental health Tramadol capsules Buy zoloft Lasix Sale tramadol Order meridia online Generic phentermine Cheap flight Cheapflights Health insurance Auto insurances Airlines Abilify Adultfriendfinder House Work at home Education Soma and loracet Broadway Pa System antivirus 2008 Servers Insurance rates Xnxx Phones Xanax generic blue Health 

Do As We Say, Not As We Do

A couple of days ago, the Post had an article detailing the strategy shift that politicians are using to “reach out” to voters. Rather than the old, and very expensive, method of sending voters junk mail, politicians are now buying very detailed e-mail lists in order to spam registered voters in targeted ways. This trend should be of no surprise to anyone. When CAN SPAM passed last year, it only “banned” commercial e-mail. Apparently, political messages are so vital that spamming voters with them is ok.


Frankly, though I would prefer no spam at all, I’d much rather see some of the fairly creative pleas to visit online pharmacies or invitations to take advantage of financial opportunities in Nigeria than receive any more messages from any candidate about how everything is going to change for the better if I’ll just go cast my vote.

Hat tip: Tad DeHaven, NTU policy analyst

In other spam news, it appears that spammers are adopting sender authentication faster than everyone else.

Via techdirt
Also, see my earlier post about how the spam wars can spur technological innovation.

September 1, 2004 | Comments |

  • Stephen
    How could CAN SPAM possibly stand up to a court challenge? Wasn't the national do-not-call register ruled unconstitutional on the grounds that it limited commercial speech but not political/non-profit speech?
blog comments powered by Disqus